Literature DB >> 10711445

Mutations of p53 tumor suppressor gene, apoptosis, and proliferation in intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma of the liver.

A Tannapfel1, L Weinans, F Geissler, A Schütz, A Katalinic, F Köckerling, J Hauss, C Wittekind.   

Abstract

This study was performed to examine the correlation between mutations of the p53 tumor suppressor gene, the occurrence of apoptosis, and proliferation in cholangiocellular carcinoma of the liver. The results obtained were compared with pathohistological stage (according to UICC) and grade and with disease related survival rate. In 41 curatively (R0-) resected intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinomas, the status of the p53 gene was determined by direct sequencing of exons 4-9 and immunohistochemically. Apoptosis was assessed using the in situ end labeling (ISEL) technique in combination with morphological criteria. Proliferation was analyzed by immunohistochemistry of MIB-1 (Ki-67), Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), and silver-stained nucleolar organizer regions (AgNOR). The results obtained were compared with pathohistological stage (according to UICC), grade, several other histopathological factors, and survival rate. Mutations of p53 were detected in 15/41 carcinomas examined (37%). The most common change was a G-->C and C-->T transition, changing the hot spot amino acid determined by exons 4-8. Of these 15 tumors, 14 were also p53-positive by immunohistochemistry. In each carcinoma examined, we could demonstrate MIB-1, PCNA, and AgNOR dots and also apoptotic cells in variable proportions. The proliferation markers showed a significant correlation among themselves. In univariate survival analysis, the extent of the primary tumor, lymph node status, grade, and p53 were significant factors influencing patient survival. Performing multivariate Cox regression survival analysis, however, only the extent of primary tumor and lymph node status had an independent prognostic impact. Apoptosis was not related to patient prognosis or to other parameters examined. In conclusion, these results indicated that p53 could serve as an additional prognostic parameter that could provide auxiliary information for patient outcome. However, tumor stage and lymph node involvement were the strongest prognostic factors. We failed to establish apoptosis or other pathological parameters as factors predicting the prognosis of patients with cholangiocellular carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10711445     DOI: 10.1023/a:1005412626515

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  23 in total

1.  Surgical treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: four patients surviving more than five years.

Authors:  J Yamamoto; T Kosuge; T Takayama; K Shimada; M Makuuchi; J Yoshida; M Sakamoto; S Hirohashi; S Yamasaki; H Hasegawa
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Long survival and prognostic factors in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  G Zhao; S Su; D Borek; S Friesen; F Holmes
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 3.454

3.  Apoptosis and proliferation in relation to histopathological variables and prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  A Tannapfel; F Geissler; F Köckerling; A Katalinic; J Hauss; C Wittekind
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 7.996

4.  Comparison of tumor pathology with duration of survival of North American patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  U C Nzeako; Z D Goodman; K G Ishak
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1995-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 5.  What constitutes long-term survival after surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma?

Authors:  J Klempnauer; G J Ridder; M Werner; A Weimann; R Pichlmayr
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1997-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Primary liver neoplasms: evaluation of proliferative index using MoAb Ki67.

Authors:  W F Grigioni; A D'Errico; F Bacci; M Gaudio; A Mazziotti; G Gozzetti; A M Mancini
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 7.996

7.  Relationship between hepatocyte proliferative activity and liver functional reserve in human cirrhosis.

Authors:  M Delhaye; H Louis; C Degraef; O Le Moine; J Devière; B Gulbis; D Jacobovitz; M Adler; P Galand
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 17.425

8.  Nonsurgical management of primary cholangiocarcinoma. Retrospective analysis of 40 cases.

Authors:  B Banerjee; S K Teplick
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Prognostic value of ploidy and proliferation markers in renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  A Tannapfel; H A Hahn; A Katalinic; R J Fietkau; R Kühn; C W Wittekind
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1996-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Hepatocellular carcinomas with a high proliferation index and a low degree of apoptosis and necrosis are associated with a shortened survival.

Authors:  Y Soini; N Virkajärvi; V P Lehto; P Pääkkö
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  [The importance of immunohistochemistry for the diagnosis of cholangiocarcinomas].

Authors:  F Länger; R von Wasielewski; H H Kreipe
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.011

2.  Identification of osteopontin as the most consistently over-expressed gene in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: detection by oligonucleotide microarray and real-time PCR analysis.

Authors:  Holger G Hass; Oliver Nehls; Juergen Jobst; Andrea Frilling; Ulrich Vogel; Stephan Kaiser
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Kras(G12D) and p53 mutation cause primary intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Michael R O'Dell; Jing Li Huang; Christa L Whitney-Miller; Vikram Deshpande; Paul Rothberg; Valerie Grose; Randall M Rossi; Andrew X Zhu; Hartmut Land; Nabeel Bardeesy; Aram F Hezel
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Potential genotype-specific single nucleotide polymorphism interaction of common variation in p53 and its negative regulator mdm2 in cholangiocarcinoma susceptibility.

Authors:  Vincent Zimmer; Aksana Höblinger; Florentina Mihalache; Gunter Assmann; Monica Acalovschi; Frank Lammert
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 5.  Molecular diagnosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Hiroaki Haga; Tushar Patel
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 7.027

Review 6.  Signaling pathways as therapeutic targets in biliary tract cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer Yang; Matthew R Farren; Daniel Ahn; Tanios Bekaii-Saab; Gregory B Lesinski
Journal:  Expert Opin Ther Targets       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 6.902

Review 7.  Genetics of biliary tract cancers and emerging targeted therapies.

Authors:  Aram F Hezel; Vikram Deshpande; Andrew X Zhu
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  New Horizons for Precision Medicine in Biliary Tract Cancers.

Authors:  Juan W Valle; Angela Lamarca; Lipika Goyal; Jorge Barriuso; Andrew X Zhu
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 39.397

Review 9.  Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: pathogenesis and rationale for molecular therapies.

Authors:  D Sia; V Tovar; A Moeini; J M Llovet
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 9.867

10.  A case of combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma with underlying schistosomiasis.

Authors:  Chang Kyun Hong; Jin Mo Yang; Bong Koo Kang; Jin Dong Kim; Young Chul Kim; U-Im Chang; Jin Young Yoo
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.884

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.