Literature DB >> 22807970

Surgical wound management made easier and more cost-effective.

Ichiro Akagi1, Kiyonori Furukawa, Masao Miyashita, Teruo Kiyama, Akihisa Matsuda, Tsutomu Nomura, Hiroshi Makino, Nobutoshi Hagiwara, Ken Takahashi, Eiji Uchida.   

Abstract

Evidence-based guidelines for the prevention of surgical site infection (SSI) have been published by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). According to these guidelines, a wound should usually be covered with a sterile dressing for 24 to 48 h when a surgical incision is closed primarily. However, it is not recommended that an incision be covered by a dressing beyond 48 h. In this study, patients were stratified into two groups for analysis: patients whose surgical wound was sterilized and whose gauze was changed once daily until postoperative day 7 (7POD; group A); and patients whose surgical wound was sterilized and whose gauze was changed once daily until 2POD (group B). We evaluated the incidence of SSI, nursing hours and cost implications. The results showed that there was no significant difference in SSI occurrence between the two groups (group A, 10% vs. group B, 7.3%). By contrast, the average nursing time differed by 2.8 min (group A, 3.8 min vs. group B, 0.9 min). The material costs per patient were also reduced by $14.70 (group A, $61.80 vs. group B, $47.10). In conclusion, we applied our knowledge of the evidence-based CDC guidelines to determine whether 48-h wound management can be made easier, more uniform and more cost-effective compared to conventional wound management. The results of the present study showed that surgical wound management methods can be more convenient and inexpensive.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22807970      PMCID: PMC3398356          DOI: 10.3892/ol.2012.687

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Lett        ISSN: 1792-1074            Impact factor:   2.967


  6 in total

Review 1.  Wound bed preparation: a systematic approach to wound management.

Authors:  Gregory S Schultz; R Gary Sibbald; Vincent Falanga; Elizabeth A Ayello; Caroline Dowsett; Keith Harding; Marco Romanelli; Michael C Stacey; Luc Teot; Wolfgang Vanscheidt
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.617

Review 2.  Innovation in healthcare: a systematic review of recent research.

Authors:  Hannakaisa Länsisalmi; Mika Kivimäki; Pirjo Aalto; Raija Ruoranen
Journal:  Nurs Sci Q       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 0.883

Review 3.  Clarifying the concepts in knowledge transfer: a literature review.

Authors:  Genevieve N Thompson; Carole A Estabrooks; Lesley F Degner
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.187

4.  Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee.

Authors:  A J Mangram; T C Horan; M L Pearson; L C Silver; W R Jarvis
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.918

5.  Nurses' views about pain and trauma at dressing changes: results of a national survey.

Authors:  H Hollinworth; M Collier
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.072

6.  Clinical benefit of a hydrocolloid dressing in closed surgical wounds.

Authors:  M H Hermans
Journal:  J ET Nurs       Date:  1993 Mar-Apr
  6 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Seeking effective interventions to treat complex wounds: an overview of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Andrea C Tricco; Jesmin Antony; Afshin Vafaei; Paul A Khan; Alana Harrington; Elise Cogo; Charlotte Wilson; Laure Perrier; Wing Hui; Sharon E Straus
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 8.775

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.