Literature DB >> 22806991

A fully Bayesian application of the Copas selection model for publication bias extended to network meta-analysis.

Dimitris Mavridis1, Alex Sutton, Andrea Cipriani, Georgia Salanti.   

Abstract

The Copas parametric model is aimed at exploring the potential impact of publication bias via sensitivity analysis, by making assumptions regarding the probability of publication of individual studies related to the standard error of their effect sizes. Reviewers often have prior assumptions about the extent of selection in the set of studies included in a meta-analysis. However, a Bayesian implementation of the Copas model has not been studied yet. We aim to present a Bayesian selection model for publication bias and to extend it to the case of network meta-analysis where each treatment is compared either with placebo or with a reference treatment creating a star-shaped network. We take advantage of the greater flexibility offered in the Bayesian context to incorporate in the model prior information on the extent and strength of selection. To derive prior distributions, we use both external data and an elicitation process of expert opinion.
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22806991      PMCID: PMC5410995          DOI: 10.1002/sim.5494

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  21 in total

Review 1.  Modelling publication bias in meta-analysis: a review.

Authors:  A J Sutton; F Song; S M Gilbody; K R Abrams
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis.

Authors:  S Duval; R Tweedie
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  A sensitivity analysis for publication bias in systematic reviews.

Authors:  J B Copas; J Q Shi
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.021

4.  Meta-analysis, funnel plots and sensitivity analysis.

Authors:  J Copas; J Q Shi
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.899

5.  How vague is vague? A simulation study of the impact of the use of vague prior distributions in MCMC using WinBUGS.

Authors:  Paul C Lambert; Alex J Sutton; Paul R Burton; Keith R Abrams; David R Jones
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2005-08-15       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Modeling between-trial variance structure in mixed treatment comparisons.

Authors:  Guobing Lu; Ae Ades
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2009-08-17       Impact factor: 5.899

7.  Meta-analysis and sensitivity analysis for multi-arm trials with selection bias.

Authors:  Hathaikan Chootrakool; Jian Qing Shi; Rongxian Yue
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-01-16       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Selection models with monotone weight functions in meta analysis.

Authors:  Kaspar Rufibach
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 2.207

9.  Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy.

Authors:  Erick H Turner; Annette M Matthews; Eftihia Linardatos; Robert A Tell; Robert Rosenthal
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-01-17       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 10.  Novel methods to deal with publication biases: secondary analysis of antidepressant trials in the FDA trial registry database and related journal publications.

Authors:  Santiago G Moreno; Alex J Sutton; Erick H Turner; Keith R Abrams; Nicola J Cooper; Tom M Palmer; A E Ades
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-08-07
View more
  17 in total

1.  Multivariate network meta-analysis to mitigate the effects of outcome reporting bias.

Authors:  Hyunsoo Hwang; Stacia M DeSantis
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Maximum likelihood estimation and EM algorithm of Copas-like selection model for publication bias correction.

Authors:  Jing Ning; Yong Chen; Jin Piao
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 5.899

3.  Copas-like selection model to correct publication bias in systematic review of diagnostic test studies.

Authors:  Jin Piao; Yulun Liu; Yong Chen; Jing Ning
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 3.021

4.  Classifying information-sharing methods.

Authors:  Georgios F Nikolaidis; Beth Woods; Stephen Palmer; Marta O Soares
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  Adjustment for reporting bias in network meta-analysis of antidepressant trials.

Authors:  Ludovic Trinquart; Gilles Chatellier; Philippe Ravaud
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 4.615

6.  A test for reporting bias in trial networks: simulation and case studies.

Authors:  Ludovic Trinquart; John P A Ioannidis; Gilles Chatellier; Philippe Ravaud
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2014-09-27       Impact factor: 4.615

7.  Meta-epidemiology.

Authors:  Jong-Myon Bae
Journal:  Epidemiol Health       Date:  2014-09-25

8.  A Bayesian framework to account for uncertainty due to missing binary outcome data in pairwise meta-analysis.

Authors:  N L Turner; S Dias; A E Ades; N J Welton
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Graphical tools for network meta-analysis in STATA.

Authors:  Anna Chaimani; Julian P T Higgins; Dimitris Mavridis; Panagiota Spyridonos; Georgia Salanti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Network Meta-analysis to Synthesize Evidence for Decision Making in Cardiovascular Research.

Authors:  Leonardo Roever; Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.