Literature DB >> 22806801

Timing of malolactic fermentation inoculation in Shiraz grape must and wine: influence on chemical composition.

Caroline E Abrahamse1, Eveline J Bartowsky.   

Abstract

Malolactic fermentation (MLF) is an integral step in red winemaking, which in addition to deacidifying wine can also influence the composition of volatile fermentation-derived compounds with concomitant affects on wine sensory properties. Long-established winemaking protocols for MLF induction generally involve inoculation of bacteria starter cultures post alcoholic fermentation, however, more recently there has been a trend to introduce bacteria earlier in the fermentation process. For the first time, this study shows the impact of bacterial inoculation on wine quality parameters that define red wine, including wine colour and phenolics, and volatile fermentation-derived compounds. This study investigates the effects of inoculating Shiraz grape must with malolactic bacteria at various stages of alcoholic fermentation [beginning of alcoholic fermentation (co-inoculation, with yeast), mid-alcoholic fermentation, at pressing and post alcoholic fermentation] on the kinetics of MLF and wine chemical composition. Co-inoculation greatly reduced the overall fermentation time by up to 6 weeks, the rate of alcoholic fermentation was not affected by the presence of bacteria and the fermentation-derived wine volatiles profile was distinct from wines produced where bacteria were inoculated late or post alcoholic fermentation. An overall slight decrease in wine colour density observed following MLF was not influenced by the MLF inoculation regime. However, there were differences in anthocyanin and pigmented polymer composition, with co-inoculation exhibiting the most distinct profile. Differences in yeast and bacteria metabolism at various stages in fermentation are proposed as the drivers for differences in volatile chemical composition. This study demonstrates, with an in-depth analysis, that co-inoculation of yeast and bacteria in wine fermentation results in shorter total vinification time and produces sound wines, thus providing the opportunity to stabilise wines more rapidly than traditional inoculation regimes permit and thereby reducing potential for microbial spoilage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22806801     DOI: 10.1007/s11274-011-0814-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 0959-3993            Impact factor:   3.312


  14 in total

1.  Effect of simultaneous inoculation with yeast and bacteria on fermentation kinetics and key wine parameters of cool-climate chardonnay.

Authors:  Delphine Jussier; Amélie Dubé Morneau; Ramón Mira de Orduña
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  High throughput analysis of red wine and grape phenolics-adaptation and validation of methyl cellulose precipitable tannin assay and modified Somers color assay to a rapid 96 well plate format.

Authors:  Meagan D Mercurio; Robert G Dambergs; Markus J Herderich; Paul A Smith
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2007-05-12       Impact factor: 5.279

3.  The effect of bacterial strain and aging on the secondary volatile metabolites produced during malolactic fermentation of tannat red wine.

Authors:  Eduardo Boido; Karina Medina; Laura Fariña; Francisco Carrau; Giuseppe Versini; Eduardo Dellacassa
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 5.279

Review 4.  Lactic acid bacteria in the quality improvement and depreciation of wine.

Authors:  A Lonvaud-Funel
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  1999 Jul-Nov       Impact factor: 2.271

5.  Metabolic profiling as a tool for revealing Saccharomyces interactions during wine fermentation.

Authors:  Kate S Howell; Daniel Cozzolino; Eveline J Bartowsky; Graham H Fleet; Paul A Henschke
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.796

6.  Flux distributions in anaerobic, glucose-limited continuous cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Torben L Nissen; Ulrik Schulze; Jens Nielsen; John Villadsen
Journal:  Microbiology (Reading)       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.777

7.  Inventory and monitoring of wine microbial consortia.

Authors:  Vincent Renouf; Olivier Claisse; Aline Lonvaud-Funel
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2007-01-19       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Genetic diversity of Dekkera bruxellensis yeasts isolated from Australian wineries.

Authors:  Chris D Curtin; Jennifer R Bellon; Paul A Henschke; Peter W Godden; Miguel A de Barros Lopes
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2007-01-15       Impact factor: 2.796

9.  Coinoculated fermentations using saccharomyces yeasts affect the volatile composition and sensory properties of Vitis vinifera L. cv. sauvignon blanc wines.

Authors:  Ellena S King; Jan H Swiegers; Brooke Travis; I Leigh Francis; Susan E P Bastian; Isak S Pretorius
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 5.279

10.  Assimilable nitrogen utilisation and production of volatile and non-volatile compounds in chemically defined medium by Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine yeasts.

Authors:  M Vilanova; M Ugliano; C Varela; T Siebert; I S Pretorius; P A Henschke
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 4.813

View more
  6 in total

1.  QTL mapping: an innovative method for investigating the genetic determinism of yeast-bacteria interactions in wine.

Authors:  Louise Bartle; Emilien Peltier; Joanna F Sundstrom; Krista Sumby; James G Mitchell; Vladimir Jiranek; Philippe Marullo
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 2.  Starter cultures as biocontrol strategy to prevent Brettanomyces bruxellensis proliferation in wine.

Authors:  Carmen Berbegal; Giuseppe Spano; Mariagiovanna Fragasso; Francesco Grieco; Pasquale Russo; Vittorio Capozzi
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Technological Improvements on FML in the Chianti Classico Wine Production: Co-Inoculation or Sequential Inoculation?

Authors:  Alessandro Bianchi; Isabella Taglieri; Francesca Venturi; Chiara Sanmartin; Giuseppe Ferroni; Monica Macaluso; Fabrizio Palla; Guido Flamini; Angela Zinnai
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-03-30

4.  Effect of Co-Inoculation of Candida zemplinina, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Lactobacillus plantarum for the Industrial Production of Negroamaro Wine in Apulia (Southern Italy).

Authors:  Maria Tufariello; Vittorio Capozzi; Giuseppe Spano; Giovanni Cantele; Pasquale Venerito; Giovanni Mita; Francesco Grieco
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-05-13

5.  Effects of Different Techniques of Malolactic Fermentation Induction on Diacetyl Metabolism and Biosynthesis of Selected Aromatic Esters in Cool-Climate Grape Wines.

Authors:  Małgorzata Lasik-Kurdyś; Małgorzata Majcher; Jacek Nowak
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-10-06       Impact factor: 4.411

6.  Non-Saccharomyces yeast and lactic acid bacteria in Co-inoculated fermentations with two Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast strains: A strategy to improve the phenolic content of Syrah wine.

Authors:  P P Minnaar; H W du Plessis; N P Jolly; M van der Rijst; M du Toit
Journal:  Food Chem X       Date:  2019-10-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.