Literature DB >> 16391046

Effect of simultaneous inoculation with yeast and bacteria on fermentation kinetics and key wine parameters of cool-climate chardonnay.

Delphine Jussier1, Amélie Dubé Morneau, Ramón Mira de Orduña.   

Abstract

Inoculating grape musts with wine yeast and lactic acid bacteria (LAB) concurrently in order to induce simultaneous alcoholic fermentation (AF) and malolactic fermentation (MLF) can be an efficient alternative to overcome potential inhibition of LAB in wines because of high ethanol concentrations and reduced nutrient content. In this study, the simultaneous inoculation of yeast and LAB into must was compared with a traditional vinification protocol, where MLF was induced after completion of AF. For this, two suitable commercial yeast-bacterium combinations were tested in cool-climate Chardonnay must. The time courses of glucose and fructose, acetaldehyde, several organic acids, and nitrogenous compounds were measured along with the final values of other key wine parameters. Sensory evaluation was done after 12 months of storage. The current study could not confirm a negative impact of simultaneous AF/MLF on fermentation success and kinetics or on final wine parameters. While acetic acid concentrations were slightly increased in wines after simultaneous AF/MLF, the differences were of neither practical nor legal significance. No statistically significant differences were found with regard to the final values of pH or total acidity and the concentrations of ethanol, acetaldehyde, glycerol, citric and lactic acids, and the nitrogen compounds arginine, ammonia, urea, citrulline, and ornithine. Sensory evaluation by a semiexpert panel confirmed the similarity of the wines. However, simultaneous inoculation led to considerable reductions in overall fermentation durations. Furthermore, differences of physiological and microbiological relevance were found. Specifically, we report the vinification of "super-dry" wines devoid of glucose and fructose after simultaneous inoculation of yeast and bacteria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16391046      PMCID: PMC1352216          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.72.1.221-227.2006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  8 in total

Review 1.  Lactic acid bacteria in the quality improvement and depreciation of wine.

Authors:  A Lonvaud-Funel
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  1999 Jul-Nov       Impact factor: 2.271

2.  NAD(P)H regeneration is the key for heterolactic fermentation of hexoses in Oenococcus oeni.

Authors:  Sergi Maicas; Sergi Ferrer; Isabel Pardo
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.777

3.  Acetaldehyde metabolism by wine lactic acid bacteria.

Authors:  J P Osborne; R Mira de Orduña; G J Pilone; S Q Liu
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 2.742

4.  Growth and arginine metabolism of the wine lactic acid bacteria Lactobacillus buchneri and Oenococcus oeni at different pH values and arginine concentrations.

Authors:  R Mira De Orduña; M L Patchett; S Q Liu; G J Pilone
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 5.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae-Oenococcus oeni interactions in wine: current knowledge and perspectives.

Authors:  Hervé Alexandre; Peter J Costello; Fabienne Remize; Jean Guzzo; Michéle Guilloux-Benatier
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 5.277

6.  The growth factor and amino acid requirements of species of the genus Leuconostoc, including Leuconostoc paramesenteroides (sp.nov.) and Leuconostoc oenos.

Authors:  E I Garvie
Journal:  J Gen Microbiol       Date:  1967-09

7.  Control of flavor development in wine during and after malolactic fermentation by Oenococcus oeni.

Authors:  J C Nielsen; M Richelieu
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Lactobacillus kunkeei sp. nov.: a spoilage organism associated with grape juice fermentations.

Authors:  C G Edwards; K M Haag; M D Collins; R A Hutson; Y C Huang
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.772

  8 in total
  12 in total

Review 1.  Bacterial-fungal interactions: hyphens between agricultural, clinical, environmental, and food microbiologists.

Authors:  P Frey-Klett; P Burlinson; A Deveau; M Barret; M Tarkka; A Sarniguet
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 11.056

2.  Use of non-conventional yeast improves the wine aroma profile of Ribolla Gialla.

Authors:  Sofia Dashko; Nerve Zhou; Tinkara Tinta; Paolo Sivilotti; Melita Sternad Lemut; Kajetan Trost; Amparo Gamero; Teun Boekhout; Lorena Butinar; Urska Vrhovsek; Jure Piskur
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 3.346

3.  Impact of different malolactic fermentation inoculation scenarios on Riesling wine aroma.

Authors:  Caroline Knoll; Stefanie Fritsch; Sylvia Schnell; Manfred Grossmann; Sibylle Krieger-Weber; Maret du Toit; Doris Rauhut
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Timing of malolactic fermentation inoculation in Shiraz grape must and wine: influence on chemical composition.

Authors:  Caroline E Abrahamse; Eveline J Bartowsky
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Evaluation of the acetaldehyde production and degradation potential of 26 enological Saccharomyces and non-Saccharomyces yeast strains in a resting cell model system.

Authors:  Erhu Li; Ramón Mira de Orduña
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 3.346

6.  Characterization of wines produced by mixed culture of autochthonous yeasts and Oenococcus oeni from the northwest region of Argentina.

Authors:  Lucía M Mendoza; María G Merín; Vilma I Morata; Marta E Farías
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2011-04-02       Impact factor: 3.346

7.  Expression of the malolactic enzyme gene (mle) from Lactobacillus plantarum under winemaking conditions.

Authors:  Bronwen J Miller; Charles M A P Franz; Gyo-Sung Cho; Maret du Toit
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 2.188

8.  Sub-optimal pH Preadaptation Improves the Survival of Lactobacillus plantarum Strains and the Malic Acid Consumption in Wine-Like Medium.

Authors:  Mariantonietta Succi; Gianfranco Pannella; Patrizio Tremonte; Luca Tipaldi; Raffaele Coppola; Massimo Iorizzo; Silvia Jane Lombardi; Elena Sorrentino
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 9.  Non-Saccharomyces in Wine: Effect Upon Oenococcus oeni and Malolactic Fermentation.

Authors:  Aitor Balmaseda; Albert Bordons; Cristina Reguant; Joaquín Bautista-Gallego
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Simultaneous and successive inoculations of yeasts and lactic acid bacteria on the fermentation of an unsulfited Tannat grape must.

Authors:  Viviana Muñoz; Bruno Beccaria; Eduardo Abreo
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 2.476

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.