Literature DB >> 22804230

The effect of peptide identification search algorithms on MS2-based label-free protein quantification.

Sven Degroeve1, An Staes, Pieter-Jan De Bock, Lennart Martens.   

Abstract

Several approaches exist for the quantification of proteins in complex samples processed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry followed by fragmentation analysis (MS2). One of these approaches is label-free MS2-based quantification, which takes advantage of the information computed from MS2 spectrum observations to estimate the abundance of a protein in a sample. As a first step in this approach, fragmentation spectra are typically matched to the peptides that generated them by a search algorithm. Because different search algorithms identify overlapping but non-identical sets of peptides, here we investigate whether these differences in peptide identification have an impact on the quantification of the proteins in the sample. We therefore evaluated the effect of using different search algorithms by examining the reproducibility of protein quantification in technical repeat measurements of the same sample. From our results, it is clear that a search engine effect does exist for MS2-based label-free protein quantification methods. As a general conclusion, it is recommended to address the overall possibility of search engine-induced bias in the protein quantification results of label-free MS2-based methods by performing the analysis with two or more distinct search engines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22804230      PMCID: PMC3437043          DOI: 10.1089/omi.2011.0137

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  OMICS        ISSN: 1536-2310


  18 in total

Review 1.  Analysis of proteins and proteomes by mass spectrometry.

Authors:  M Mann; R C Hendrickson; A Pandey
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 23.643

2.  Exponentially modified protein abundance index (emPAI) for estimation of absolute protein amount in proteomics by the number of sequenced peptides per protein.

Authors:  Yasushi Ishihama; Yoshiya Oda; Tsuyoshi Tabata; Toshitaka Sato; Takeshi Nagasu; Juri Rappsilber; Matthias Mann
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2005-06-14       Impact factor: 5.911

3.  Interpretation of shotgun proteomic data: the protein inference problem.

Authors:  Alexey I Nesvizhskii; Ruedi Aebersold
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2005-07-11       Impact factor: 5.911

4.  An evaluation, comparison, and accurate benchmarking of several publicly available MS/MS search algorithms: sensitivity and specificity analysis.

Authors:  Eugene A Kapp; Frédéric Schütz; Lisa M Connolly; John A Chakel; Jose E Meza; Christine A Miller; David Fenyo; Jimmy K Eng; Joshua N Adkins; Gilbert S Omenn; Richard J Simpson
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.984

5.  Overview of the HUPO Plasma Proteome Project: results from the pilot phase with 35 collaborating laboratories and multiple analytical groups, generating a core dataset of 3020 proteins and a publicly-available database.

Authors:  Gilbert S Omenn; David J States; Marcin Adamski; Thomas W Blackwell; Rajasree Menon; Henning Hermjakob; Rolf Apweiler; Brian B Haab; Richard J Simpson; James S Eddes; Eugene A Kapp; Robert L Moritz; Daniel W Chan; Alex J Rai; Arie Admon; Ruedi Aebersold; Jimmy Eng; William S Hancock; Stanley A Hefta; Helmut Meyer; Young-Ki Paik; Jong-Shin Yoo; Peipei Ping; Joel Pounds; Joshua Adkins; Xiaohong Qian; Rong Wang; Valerie Wasinger; Chi Yue Wu; Xiaohang Zhao; Rong Zeng; Alexander Archakov; Akira Tsugita; Ilan Beer; Akhilesh Pandey; Michael Pisano; Philip Andrews; Harald Tammen; David W Speicher; Samir M Hanash
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.984

6.  Reporting protein identification data: the next generation of guidelines.

Authors:  Ralph A Bradshaw; Alma L Burlingame; Steven Carr; Ruedi Aebersold
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.911

7.  Comparative evaluation of tandem MS search algorithms using a target-decoy search strategy.

Authors:  Brian M Balgley; Tom Laudeman; Li Yang; Tao Song; Cheng S Lee
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2007-05-28       Impact factor: 5.911

8.  RIBAR and xRIBAR: Methods for reproducible relative MS/MS-based label-free protein quantification.

Authors:  Niklaas Colaert; Kris Gevaert; Lennart Martens
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 9.  Mass spectrometry and the age of the proteome.

Authors:  J R Yates
Journal:  J Mass Spectrom       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 1.982

10.  Quantitative proteomic analysis of distinct mammalian Mediator complexes using normalized spectral abundance factors.

Authors:  Andrew C Paoletti; Tari J Parmely; Chieri Tomomori-Sato; Shigeo Sato; Dongxiao Zhu; Ronald C Conaway; Joan Weliky Conaway; Laurence Florens; Michael P Washburn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-11-30       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  1 in total

1.  Bioinformatics challenges and solutions in proteomics as quantitative methods mature.

Authors:  Andrew R Jones
Journal:  OMICS       Date:  2012-07-17
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.