Literature DB >> 22803519

Pharmacokinetics of eribulin mesylate in patients with solid tumours receiving repeated oral rifampicin.

Lot A Devriese1, Petronella Els O Witteveen, Jantien Wanders, Kenneth Law, Geoff Edwards, Larisa Reyderman, William Copalu, Fuping Peng, Serena Marchetti, Jos H Beijnen, Alwin D R Huitema, Emile E Voest, Jan H M Schellens.   

Abstract

AIM: Eribulin mesylate is a non-taxane microtubule dynamics inhibitor that was recently approved for treatment of metastatic breast cancer. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of rifampicin, a CYP3A4 inducer, on the plasma pharmacokinetics of eribulin in patients with solid tumours.
METHODS: An open-label, non-randomized phase I study was carried out. Patients received intravenous 1.4 mg m(-2) eribulin mesylate on days 1 and 15 and oral rifampicin 600 mg on days 9 to 20 of a 28 day cycle. Pharmacokinetic sampling for determination of eribulin plasma concentrations was performed up to 144 h following administration. AUC(0,∞) and C(max) for eribulin exposure without or with co-administration of rifampicin were subjected to an analysis of variance (anova) and corresponding 90% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Subsequently, patients were allowed to continue eribulin mesylate treatment with 1.4 mg m(-2) eribulin mesylate on days 1 and 8 of a 21 day cycle. Also the adverse event profile and anti-tumour activity were assessed.
RESULTS: Fourteen patients were included and 11 patients were evaluable for pharmacokinetic analysis. Co-administration of rifampicin had no effect on single dose exposure to eribulin (geometric least square means ratio: AUC(0,∞) = 1.10, 90% CI 0.91, 1.34 and C(max) = 0.97, 90% 0.81, 1.17). The most common treatment-related grade ≥3 adverse events were grade 3 neutropenia (4/14, 29%), leucopenia and fatigue (both 3/14, 21%).
CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that eribulin mesylate may be safely co-administered with compounds that are CYP3A4 inducers.
© 2012 The Authors. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology © 2012 The British Pharmacological Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 22803519      PMCID: PMC3579265          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04381.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  27 in total

1.  Drug-drug interactions in medical patients: effects of in-hospital treatment and relation to multiple drug use.

Authors:  G I Köhler; S M Bode-Böger; R Busse; M Hoopmann; T Welte; R H Böger
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.366

2.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 3.  Drug interactions in oncology.

Authors:  Jos H Beijnen; Jan H M Schellens
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine.

Authors:  D W Cockcroft; M H Gault
Journal:  Nephron       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 2.847

Review 5.  Herb-drug interactions in oncology: focus on mechanisms of induction.

Authors:  Irma Meijerman; Jos H Beijnen; Jan H M Schellens
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug

6.  In vitro and in vivo anticancer activities of synthetic macrocyclic ketone analogues of halichondrin B.

Authors:  M J Towle; K A Salvato; J Budrow; B F Wels; G Kuznetsov; K K Aalfs; S Welsh; W Zheng; B M Seletsky; M H Palme; G J Habgood; L A Singer; L V Dipietro; Y Wang; J J Chen; D A Quincy; A Davis; K Yoshimatsu; Y Kishi; M J Yu; B A Littlefield
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2001-02-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 7.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic consequences and clinical relevance of cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibition.

Authors:  G K Dresser; J D Spence; D G Bailey
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  The primary antimitotic mechanism of action of the synthetic halichondrin E7389 is suppression of microtubule growth.

Authors:  Mary Ann Jordan; Kathryn Kamath; Tapas Manna; Tatiana Okouneva; Herbert P Miller; Celia Davis; Bruce A Littlefield; Leslie Wilson
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 6.261

Review 9.  The role of nuclear receptors in pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions in oncology.

Authors:  S Harmsen; I Meijerman; J H Beijnen; J H M Schellens
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2007-04-23       Impact factor: 12.111

Review 10.  Pharmacokinetic interactions with rifampicin : clinical relevance.

Authors:  Mikko Niemi; Janne T Backman; Martin F Fromm; Pertti J Neuvonen; Kari T Kivistö
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 6.447

View more
  8 in total

1.  Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis for eribulin mesilate-associated neutropenia.

Authors:  J G Coen van Hasselt; Anubha Gupta; Ziad Hussein; Jos H Beijnen; Jan H M Schellens; Alwin D R Huitema
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Initial testing (stage 1) of eribulin, a novel tubulin binding agent, by the pediatric preclinical testing program.

Authors:  E Anders Kolb; Richard Gorlick; C Patrick Reynolds; Min H Kang; Hernan Carol; Richard Lock; Stephen T Keir; John M Maris; Catherine A Billups; Christopher Desjardins; Raushan T Kurmasheva; Peter J Houghton; Malcolm A Smith
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 3.167

3.  Primary Culture of Undifferentiated Pleomorphic Sarcoma: Molecular Characterization and Response to Anticancer Agents.

Authors:  Alessandro De Vita; Federica Recine; Laura Mercatali; Giacomo Miserocchi; Chiara Spadazzi; Chiara Liverani; Alberto Bongiovanni; Federica Pieri; Roberto Casadei; Nada Riva; Valentina Fausti; Dino Amadori; Toni Ibrahim
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Integrating mechanisms of response and resistance against the tubulin binding agent Eribulin in preclinical models of osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Valerie B Sampson; Nancy S Vetter; Wendong Zhang; Pratima U Patil; Robert W Mason; Erika George; Richard Gorlick; Edward A Kolb
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-12-27

5.  Eribulin, Child-Pugh score, and liver-function tests: lessons from pivotal breast cancer studies 301 and 305.

Authors:  Iain R Macpherson; Yaohua He; Carlo Palmieri
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 6.466

6.  Combination of Abemaciclib following Eribulin Overcomes Palbociclib-Resistant Breast Cancer by Inhibiting the G2/M Cell Cycle Phase.

Authors:  Kamal Pandey; Nar Bahadur Katuwal; Nahee Park; Jin Hur; Young Bin Cho; Seung Ki Kim; Seung Ah Lee; Isaac Kim; Seung-Ryeol Lee; Yong Wha Moon
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 7.  Eribulin in Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Umang Swami; Umang Shah; Sanjay Goel
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 5.118

8.  Phase I dose-finding study of eribulin and capecitabine for metastatic breast cancer: JBCRG-18 cape study.

Authors:  Masaya Hattori; Hiroshi Ishiguro; Norikazu Masuda; Akiyo Yoshimura; Shoichiro Ohtani; Hiroyuki Yasojima; Satoshi Morita; Shinji Ohno; Hiroji Iwata
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 4.239

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.