BACKGROUND: Antimitotic agents are essential components for curative therapy of pediatric acute leukemias and many solid tumors. Eribulin is a novel agent that differs from both Vinca alkaloids and taxanes in its mode of binding to tubulin polymers. PROCEDURES: Eribulin was tested against the PPTP in vitro cell line panel at concentrations from 0.1 nM to 1.0 μM and against the PPTP in vivo xenograft panels at a dose of 1 mg/kg (solid tumors) or 1.5 mg/kg (ALL models) using a q4dx3 schedule repeated at Day 21. RESULTS: In vitro eribulin demonstrated cytotoxic activity, with a median relative IC50 value of 0.27 nM, (range <0.1-14.8 nM). Eribulin was well tolerated in vivo, and all 43 xenograft models were considered evaluable for efficacy. Eribulin induced significant differences in event-free survival (EFS) distribution compared to control in 29 of 35 (83%) of the solid tumors and in 8 of 8 (100%) of the ALL xenografts. Objective responses were observed in 18 of 35 (51%) solid tumor xenografts. Complete responses (CR) or maintained CR were observed in panels of Wilms tumor, Ewing sarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, glioblastoma, and osteosarcoma xenografts. All eight ALL xenografts achieved CR or MCR. CONCLUSIONS: The high level of activity observed for eribulin against the PPTP preclinical models makes this an interesting agent to consider for pediatric evaluation. The activity pattern observed for eribulin in the solid tumor panels is equal or superior to that observed previously for vincristine.
BACKGROUND: Antimitotic agents are essential components for curative therapy of pediatric acute leukemias and many solid tumors. Eribulin is a novel agent that differs from both Vinca alkaloids and taxanes in its mode of binding to tubulin polymers. PROCEDURES: Eribulin was tested against the PPTP in vitro cell line panel at concentrations from 0.1 nM to 1.0 μM and against the PPTP in vivo xenograft panels at a dose of 1 mg/kg (solid tumors) or 1.5 mg/kg (ALL models) using a q4dx3 schedule repeated at Day 21. RESULTS: In vitro eribulin demonstrated cytotoxic activity, with a median relative IC50 value of 0.27 nM, (range <0.1-14.8 nM). Eribulin was well tolerated in vivo, and all 43 xenograft models were considered evaluable for efficacy. Eribulin induced significant differences in event-free survival (EFS) distribution compared to control in 29 of 35 (83%) of the solid tumors and in 8 of 8 (100%) of the ALL xenografts. Objective responses were observed in 18 of 35 (51%) solid tumor xenografts. Complete responses (CR) or maintained CR were observed in panels of Wilms tumor, Ewing sarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, glioblastoma, and osteosarcoma xenografts. All eight ALL xenografts achieved CR or MCR. CONCLUSIONS: The high level of activity observed for eribulin against the PPTP preclinical models makes this an interesting agent to consider for pediatric evaluation. The activity pattern observed for eribulin in the solid tumor panels is equal or superior to that observed previously for vincristine.
Authors: J H Edmonson; S J Green; J C Ivins; G S Gilchrist; E T Creagan; D J Pritchard; W A Smithson; D C Dahlin; W F Taylor Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1984-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: M J Towle; K A Salvato; J Budrow; B F Wels; G Kuznetsov; K K Aalfs; S Welsh; W Zheng; B M Seletsky; M H Palme; G J Habgood; L A Singer; L V Dipietro; Y Wang; J J Chen; D A Quincy; A Davis; K Yoshimatsu; Y Kishi; M J Yu; B A Littlefield Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2001-02-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: L A Devriese; M Mergui-Roelvink; J Wanders; A Jenner; G Edwards; L Reyderman; W Copalu; F Peng; S Marchetti; J H Beijnen; J H M Schellens Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2012-05-05 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Natalia L M Liem; Rachael A Papa; Christopher G Milross; Michael A Schmid; Mayamin Tajbakhsh; Seoyeon Choi; Carole D Ramirez; Alison M Rice; Michelle Haber; Murray D Norris; Karen L MacKenzie; Richard B Lock Journal: Blood Date: 2004-02-05 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Marielle E Yohe; Christine M Heske; Elizabeth Stewart; Peter C Adamson; Nabil Ahmed; Cristina R Antonescu; Eleanor Chen; Natalie Collins; Alan Ehrlich; Rene L Galindo; Berkley E Gryder; Heidi Hahn; Sharon Hammond; Mark E Hatley; Douglas S Hawkins; Madeline N Hayes; Andrea Hayes-Jordan; Lee J Helman; Simone Hettmer; Myron S Ignatius; Charles Keller; Javed Khan; David G Kirsch; Corinne M Linardic; Philip J Lupo; Rossella Rota; Jack F Shern; Janet Shipley; Sivasish Sindiri; Stephen J Tapscott; Christopher R Vakoc; Leonard H Wexler; David M Langenau Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2019-06-21 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Malcolm A Smith; Oliver A Hampton; C Patrick Reynolds; Min H Kang; John M Maris; Richard Gorlick; E Anders Kolb; Richard Lock; Hernan Carol; Stephen T Keir; Jianrong Wu; Raushan T Kurmasheva; David A Wheeler; Peter J Houghton Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2014-09-27 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Michael S Isakoff; Robert Goldsby; Doojduen Villaluna; Mark D Krailo; Richard Gorlick; John J Doski; Richard B Womer; Katherine A Janeway Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2015-09-16 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Eric R Molina; Letitia K Chim; Sergio Barrios; Joseph A Ludwig; Antonios G Mikos Journal: Tissue Eng Part B Rev Date: 2020-02-14 Impact factor: 6.389
Authors: C Patrick Reynolds; Min H Kang; John M Maris; E Anders Kolb; Richard Gorlick; Jianrong Wu; Raushan T Kurmasheva; Peter J Houghton; Malcolm A Smith Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2015-07-07 Impact factor: 3.167