Iain R Macpherson1, Yaohua He2, Carlo Palmieri3,4. 1. Institute of Cancer Sciences, CR-UK Beatson Institute, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK. 2. Formerly of Eisai Inc., Woodcliff Lake, NJ, USA. 3. Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, The Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Ashton Street, Liverpool, L69 3GE, UK. c.palmieri@liverpool.ac.uk. 4. Academic Department of Medical Oncology, The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK. c.palmieri@liverpool.ac.uk.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The recommended starting dose of eribulin in patients with hepatic impairment is based on the Child-Pugh score, largely informed by a pharmacokinetic study of 18 patients. In the pivotal studies of eribulin in metastatic breast cancer (Study 301 and Study 305 [EMBRACE]), entry criteria and dose modifications were based on liver-function test (LFT) results rather than Child-Pugh score. In populations such as patients with metastatic breast cancer, in which metastatic infiltration is the predominant cause of hepatic impairment, using Child-Pugh score may be problematic; in clinical practice, it has been more common for oncologists to make dosing decisions based on LFTs. To address this, the effects of abnormal baseline LFT results on eribulin efficacy and safety were investigated. METHODS: In this pooled post hoc analysis, 1062 patients who were randomized to receive eribulin in Studies 301 and 305 were divided into 4 groups: (A) no elevated LFT results (no liver impairment); (B) increased levels of aspartate aminotransferase and/or alanine aminotransferase; (C) decreased albumin and/or increased levels of aspartate aminotransferase and/or alanine aminotransferase but not increased bilirubin; and (D) increased bilirubin. Patients were subcategorized by presence of liver metastasis. Drug exposure, dose intensity, and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were analyzed. RESULTS: Eribulin mesylate mean dosage was 0.82 (group A)-0.65 mg/m2/week (group D). Group D had shorter treatment, more dose reductions/delays, more TEAEs leading to dose modifications, and numerically lower objective response rates and clinical benefit rates versus groups A-C. TEAE rates leading to dose modification were similar between group D (45.5%) and groups A-C (range, 43.5-54.9%) in the absence of liver metastases, but higher in group D (91.3%) compared with groups A-C (range, 41.7-54.3%) if liver metastases were present. CONCLUSIONS: Mild elevations in bilirubin levels were associated with increased toxicity and a greater requirement for dose modifications. Based both on these study data and existing recommendations, we propose a novel scheme to guide initial dose selection in patients with metastatic breast cancer and hepatic impairment that is based on LFTs rather than Child-Pugh score.
BACKGROUND: The recommended starting dose of eribulin in patients with hepatic impairment is based on the Child-Pugh score, largely informed by a pharmacokinetic study of 18 patients. In the pivotal studies of eribulin in metastatic breast cancer (Study 301 and Study 305 [EMBRACE]), entry criteria and dose modifications were based on liver-function test (LFT) results rather than Child-Pugh score. In populations such as patients with metastatic breast cancer, in which metastatic infiltration is the predominant cause of hepatic impairment, using Child-Pugh score may be problematic; in clinical practice, it has been more common for oncologists to make dosing decisions based on LFTs. To address this, the effects of abnormal baseline LFT results on eribulin efficacy and safety were investigated. METHODS: In this pooled post hoc analysis, 1062 patients who were randomized to receive eribulin in Studies 301 and 305 were divided into 4 groups: (A) no elevated LFT results (no liver impairment); (B) increased levels of aspartate aminotransferase and/or alanine aminotransferase; (C) decreased albumin and/or increased levels of aspartate aminotransferase and/or alanine aminotransferase but not increased bilirubin; and (D) increased bilirubin. Patients were subcategorized by presence of liver metastasis. Drug exposure, dose intensity, and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were analyzed. RESULTS: Eribulin mesylate mean dosage was 0.82 (group A)-0.65 mg/m2/week (group D). Group D had shorter treatment, more dose reductions/delays, more TEAEs leading to dose modifications, and numerically lower objective response rates and clinical benefit rates versus groups A-C. TEAE rates leading to dose modification were similar between group D (45.5%) and groups A-C (range, 43.5-54.9%) in the absence of liver metastases, but higher in group D (91.3%) compared with groups A-C (range, 41.7-54.3%) if liver metastases were present. CONCLUSIONS: Mild elevations in bilirubin levels were associated with increased toxicity and a greater requirement for dose modifications. Based both on these study data and existing recommendations, we propose a novel scheme to guide initial dose selection in patients with metastatic breast cancer and hepatic impairment that is based on LFTs rather than Child-Pugh score.
Entities:
Keywords:
Bilirubin; Breast cancer; Child-Pugh score; Eribulin; Liver-function tests
Authors: Lot A Devriese; Petronella Els O Witteveen; Jantien Wanders; Kenneth Law; Geoff Edwards; Larisa Reyderman; William Copalu; Fuping Peng; Serena Marchetti; Jos H Beijnen; Alwin D R Huitema; Emile E Voest; Jan H M Schellens Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Jiri Horak; Jeff White; Adrian L Harris; Mark Verrill; James Carmichael; Alison Holt; Mireille Cantarini; Merran Macpherson; Alan Swaisland; Helen Swaisland; Chris Twelves Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2011-04-13 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Javier Cortes; Joyce O'Shaughnessy; David Loesch; Joanne L Blum; Linda T Vahdat; Katarina Petrakova; Philippe Chollet; Alexey Manikas; Veronique Diéras; Thierry Delozier; Vladimir Vladimirov; Fatima Cardoso; Han Koh; Philippe Bougnoux; Corina E Dutcus; Seth Seegobin; Denis Mir; Nicole Meneses; Jantien Wanders; Chris Twelves Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-03-02 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: L A Devriese; M Mergui-Roelvink; J Wanders; A Jenner; G Edwards; L Reyderman; W Copalu; F Peng; S Marchetti; J H Beijnen; J H M Schellens Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2012-05-05 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: L A Devriese; P O Witteveen; S Marchetti; M Mergui-Roelvink; L Reyderman; J Wanders; A Jenner; G Edwards; J H Beijnen; E E Voest; J H M Schellens Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2012-09-26 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Jennifer A Smith; Leslie Wilson; Olga Azarenko; Xiaojie Zhu; Bryan M Lewis; Bruce A Littlefield; Mary Ann Jordan Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2010-02-16 Impact factor: 3.162
Authors: Peter A Kaufman; Ahmad Awada; Chris Twelves; Louise Yelle; Edith A Perez; Galina Velikova; Martin S Olivo; Yi He; Corina E Dutcus; Javier Cortes Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-01-20 Impact factor: 44.544