Literature DB >> 22801744

Skin examination behavior: the role of melanoma history, skin type, psychosocial factors, and region of residence in determining clinical and self-conducted skin examination.

Nadine A Kasparian1, Richard Bränström, Yu-mei Chang, Paul Affleck, Lisa G Aspinwall, Aad Tibben, Esther Azizi, Orna Baron-Epel, Linda Battistuzzi, William Bruno, May Chan, Francisco Cuellar, Tadeusz Debniak, Dace Pjanova, Slawomir Ertmanski, Adina Figl, Melinda Gonzalez, Nicholas K Hayward, Marko Hocevar, Peter A Kanetsky, Sancy Leachman, Wilma Bergman, Olita Heisele, Jane Palmer, Barbara Peric, Susana Puig, Dirk Schadendorf, Nelleke A Gruis, Julia Newton-Bishop, Yvonne Brandberg.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the frequency and correlates of skin examination behaviors in an international sample of individuals at varying risk of developing melanoma.
DESIGN: A cross-sectional, web-based survey.
SETTING: Data were collected from the general population over a 20-month period on behalf of the Melanoma Genetics Consortium (GenoMEL). PARTICIPANTS: A total of 8178 adults from Northern (32%), Central (33%), and Southern (14%) Europe, Australia (13%), and the United States (8%). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-reported frequency of skin self-examination (SSE) and clinical skin examination (CSE).
RESULTS: After adjustment for age and sex, frequency of skin examination was higher in both Australia (odds ratio [OR]SSE=1.80 [99% CI, 1.49-2.18]; ORCSE=2.68 [99% CI, 2.23-3.23]) and the United States (ORSSE=2.28 [99% CI, 1.76-2.94]; ORCSE=3.39 [99% CI, 2.60-4.18]) than in the 3 European regions combined. Within Europe, participants from Southern Europe reported higher rates of SSE than those in Northern Europe (ORSSE=1.61 [99% CI, 1.31-1.97]), and frequency of CSE was higher in both Central (ORCSE=1.47 [99% CI, 1.22-1.78]) and Southern Europe (ORCSE=3.46 [99% CI, 2.78, 4.31]) than in Northern Europe. Skin examination behavior also varied according to melanoma history: participants with no history of melanoma reported the lowest levels of skin examination, while participants with a previous melanoma diagnosis reported the highest levels. After adjustment for region, and taking into account the role of age, sex, skin type, and mole count, engagement in SSE and CSE was associated with a range of psychosocial factors, including perceived risk of developing melanoma; perceived benefits of, and barriers to, skin examination; perceived confidence in one's ability to engage in screening; and social norms. In addition, among those with no history of melanoma, higher cancer-related worry was associated with greater frequency of SSE.
CONCLUSIONS: Given the strong association between psychosocial factors and skin examination behaviors, particularly among people with no history of melanoma, we recommend that greater attempts be made to integrate psycho-education into the fabric of public health initiatives and clinical care, with clinicians, researchers, and advocacy groups playing a key role in guiding individuals to appropriate tools and resources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22801744      PMCID: PMC4965805          DOI: 10.1001/archdermatol.2012.1817

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dermatol        ISSN: 0003-987X


  27 in total

1.  Presentation and detection of invasive melanoma in a high-risk population.

Authors:  Michelle McPherson; Mark Elwood; Dallas R English; Peter D Baade; Philippa H Youl; Joanne F Aitken
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 11.527

2.  Predictors of sun protection behaviors and severe sunburn in an international online study.

Authors:  Richard Bränström; Nadine A Kasparian; Yu-mei Chang; Paul Affleck; Aad Tibben; Lisa G Aspinwall; Esther Azizi; Orna Baron-Epel; Linda Battistuzzi; Wilma Bergman; William Bruno; May Chan; Francisco Cuellar; Tadeusz Debniak; Dace Pjanova; Slawomir Ertmanski; Adina Figl; Melinda Gonzalez; Nicholas K Hayward; Marko Hocevar; Peter A Kanetsky; Sancy A Leachman; Olita Heisele; Jane Palmer; Barbara Peric; Susana Puig; Dirk Schadendorf; Nelleke A Gruis; Julia Newton-Bishop; Yvonne Brandberg
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Factors related to non-attendance in a population based melanoma screening program.

Authors:  M Bergenmar; S Törnberg; Y Brandberg
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.894

4.  Psychosocial predictors of gay men's AIDS risk-reduction behavior.

Authors:  L G Aspinwall; M E Kemeny; S E Taylor; S G Schneider; J P Dudley
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.267

5.  The validity and practicality of sun-reactive skin types I through VI.

Authors:  T B Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  1988-06

6.  Recent trends in cutaneous melanoma incidence among whites in the United States.

Authors:  A Jemal; S S Devesa; P Hartge; M A Tucker
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-05-02       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Factors influencing participation among melanoma screening attenders.

Authors:  M J de Rooij; F H Rampen; L J Schouten; H A Neumann
Journal:  Acta Derm Venereol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.437

8.  Melanoma risk factors, perceived threat and intentional tanning: an international online survey.

Authors:  Richard Bränström; Yu-Mei Chang; Nadine Kasparian; Paul Affleck; Aad Tibben; Lisa G Aspinwall; Esther Azizi; Orna Baron-Epel; Linda Battistuzzi; William Bruno; May Chan; Francisco Cuellar; Tadeusz Debniak; Dace Pjanova; Sławomir Ertmański; Adina Figl; Melinda Gonzalez; Nicholas K Hayward; Marko Hocevar; Peter A Kanetsky; Samantha L Leaf; Frans A van Nieuwpoort; Olita Heisele; Jane Palmer; Barbara Peric; Susana Puig; Althea D Ruffin; Dirk Schadendorf; Nelleke A Gruis; Yvonne Brandberg; Julia Newton-Bishop
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.497

9.  Psychological side effects of breast cancer screening.

Authors:  C Lerman; B Trock; B K Rimer; C Jepson; D Brody; A Boyce
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.267

10.  CDKN2A/p16 genetic test reporting improves early detection intentions and practices in high-risk melanoma families.

Authors:  Lisa G Aspinwall; Samantha L Leaf; Erin R Dola; Wendy Kohlmann; Sancy A Leachman
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.254

View more
  8 in total

1.  Understanding Skin Screening Practices Among Children at Elevated Risk for Melanoma to Inform Interventions for Melanoma Prevention and Control.

Authors:  Bridget G Parsons; Jennifer L Hay; Lisa G Aspinwall; Kelsey Zaugg; Angela Zhu; Ryan H Mooney; Stephanie Z Klein; Douglas Grossman; Sancy A Leachman; Yelena P Wu
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Promoting sunscreen use and skin self-examination to improve early detection and prevent skin cancer: quasi-experimental trial of an adolescent psycho-educational intervention.

Authors:  Gill Hubbard; Richard G Kyle; Richard D Neal; Vincent Marmara; Ziyan Wang; Stephan U Dombrowski
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  The Melanoma Genomics Managing Your Risk Study randomised controlled trial: statistical analysis plan.

Authors:  Serigne N Lo; Amelia K Smit; David Espinoza; Anne E Cust
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 2.279

4.  Do Subjective Norms Predict the Screening of Cancer Patients' First-Degree Relatives? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mojtaba Fattahi Ardakani; Amin Salehi-Abargouei; Ahmad Sotoudeh; Somayyeh Esmaeildokht; Vali Bahrevar
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2020-06-01

5.  A health promotion perspective for the control and prevention of Brucellosis (Brucella melitensis); Israel as a case study.

Authors:  Orna Baron-Epel; Samira Obeid; Dorit Kababya; Shiran Bord; Vicki Myers
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2022-09-26

6.  Barriers and facilitators of adherence to medical advice on skin self-examination during melanoma follow-up care.

Authors:  Annett Körner; Martin Drapeau; Brett D Thombs; Zeev Rosberger; Beatrice Wang; Manish Khanna; Alan Spatz; Adina Coroiu; Rosalind Garland; Gerald Batist
Journal:  BMC Dermatol       Date:  2013-03-01

7.  Low rate of dermatology outpatient visits in Asian-Americans: an initial survey study for associated patient-related factors.

Authors:  Bharathi Lingala; Shufeng Li; Ashley Wysong; Allison K Truong; David Kim; Anne Lynn S Chang
Journal:  BMC Dermatol       Date:  2014-08-02

8.  Impact of personal genomic risk information on melanoma prevention behaviors and psychological outcomes: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Amelia K Smit; Martin Allen; Brooke Beswick; Phyllis Butow; Hugh Dawkins; Suzanne J Dobbinson; Kate L Dunlop; David Espinoza; Georgina Fenton; Peter A Kanetsky; Louise Keogh; Michael G Kimlin; Judy Kirk; Matthew H Law; Serigne Lo; Cynthia Low; Graham J Mann; Gillian Reyes-Marcelino; Rachael L Morton; Ainsley J Newson; Jacqueline Savard; Lyndal Trevena; Sarah Wordsworth; Anne E Cust
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 8.822

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.