Literature DB >> 18559569

CDKN2A/p16 genetic test reporting improves early detection intentions and practices in high-risk melanoma families.

Lisa G Aspinwall1, Samantha L Leaf, Erin R Dola, Wendy Kohlmann, Sancy A Leachman.   

Abstract

Genetic testing for melanoma has yet to enter routine clinical use because of the scarcity of available data on the effect of test reporting. A prospective study of 59 members of Utah CDKN2A/p16 mutation-positive pedigrees was conducted to establish the effect of CDKN2A/p16 genetic test reporting on melanoma early detection intentions and behaviors (total body skin examination and skin self-examination) in a high-risk population. Behavioral assessments were made at baseline, immediately after CDKN2A/p16 test reporting and counseling, and at 1-month follow-up (42 participants). Baseline screening practices were poor relative to current recommendations, especially among participants without a personal history of melanoma. Changes from baseline practice were evaluated in three groups of participants (CDKN2A/p16+ with history of melanoma, CDKN2A/p16+ without melanoma history, and CDKN2A/p16-). Across multiple measures, test reporting caused CDKN2A/p16 mutation carriers without a melanoma history to improve to the level of adherence reported by participants with a melanoma history, without decreasing compliance of the CDKN2A/p16- group. Compared with baseline, CDKN2A/p16+ participants without a melanoma history reported greater intention to obtain total body skin examinations (P < 0.0001), increased intentions and adherence to skin self-examination recommendations (P < 0.01 and P < 0.001, respectively), and increased number of body sites examined at 1 month (P < 0.002); further, 55% reported adopting a new screening behavior at follow-up. Test reporting also improved skin self-examination adherence among CDKN2A/p16- participants (P < 0.03). The finding that CDKN2A/p16 test reporting enhances compliance with early detection measures among CDKN2A/p16+ participants without diminishing the compliance of CDKN2A/p16- participants suggests a favorable risk-benefit ratio for melanoma genetic testing in high-risk patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18559569     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  31 in total

Review 1.  Update in genetic susceptibility in melanoma.

Authors:  Miriam Potrony; Celia Badenas; Paula Aguilera; Joan Anton Puig-Butille; Cristina Carrera; Josep Malvehy; Susana Puig
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-09

2.  Impact of melanoma genetic test reporting on perceived control over melanoma prevention.

Authors:  Lisa G Aspinwall; Tammy K Stump; Jennifer M Taber; Wendy Kohlmann; Samantha L Leaf; Sancy A Leachman
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2015-03-31

3.  Framing recommendations to promote prevention behaviors among people at high risk: A simulation study of responses to melanoma genetic test reporting.

Authors:  Jennifer M Taber; Lisa G Aspinwall
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Future perspectives in melanoma research: meeting report from the "Melanoma Bridge", Napoli, December 5th-8th 2013.

Authors:  Paolo A Ascierto; Antonio M Grimaldi; Ana Carrizosa Anderson; Carlo Bifulco; Alistair Cochran; Claus Garbe; Alexander M Eggermont; Mark Faries; Soldano Ferrone; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Thomas F Gajewski; Ruth Halaban; F Stephen Hodi; Richard Kefford; John M Kirkwood; James Larkin; Sancy Leachman; Michele Maio; Richard Marais; Giuseppe Masucci; Ignacio Melero; Giuseppe Palmieri; Igor Puzanov; Antoni Ribas; Yvonne Saenger; Bastian Schilling; Barbara Seliger; David Stroncek; Ryan Sullivan; Alessandro Testori; Ena Wang; Gennaro Ciliberto; Nicola Mozzillo; Francesco M Marincola; Magdalena Thurin
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 5.531

5.  Understanding Skin Screening Practices Among Children at Elevated Risk for Melanoma to Inform Interventions for Melanoma Prevention and Control.

Authors:  Bridget G Parsons; Jennifer L Hay; Lisa G Aspinwall; Kelsey Zaugg; Angela Zhu; Ryan H Mooney; Stephanie Z Klein; Douglas Grossman; Sancy A Leachman; Yelena P Wu
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  Melanoma genetic counseling and test reporting improve screening adherence among unaffected carriers 2 years later.

Authors:  Lisa G Aspinwall; Jennifer M Taber; Samantha L Leaf; Wendy Kohlmann; Sancy A Leachman
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Perceived risk following melanoma genetic testing: a 2-year prospective study distinguishing subjective estimates from recall.

Authors:  Lisa G Aspinwall; Jennifer M Taber; Wendy Kohlmann; Samantha L Leaf; Sancy A Leachman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Skin cancer screening behaviours among individuals with a strong family history of malignant melanoma.

Authors:  N A Kasparian; J K McLoone; B Meiser; P N Butow; J M Simpson; G J Mann
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Genetic counseling in melanoma.

Authors:  Celia Badenas; Paula Aguilera; Joan A Puig-Butillé; Cristina Carrera; Josep Malvehy; Susana Puig
Journal:  Dermatol Ther       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.851

Review 10.  A systematic review of interventions to improve adherence to melanoma preventive behaviors for individuals at elevated risk.

Authors:  Yelena P Wu; Lisa G Aspinwall; Bridgid M Conn; Tammy Stump; Bridget Grahmann; Sancy A Leachman
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 4.018

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.