Literature DB >> 9394985

Factors influencing participation among melanoma screening attenders.

M J de Rooij1, F H Rampen, L J Schouten, H A Neumann.   

Abstract

We surveyed the demographic profile and motives prompting to participate among people attending voluntary melanoma screening clinics in Southern Limburg, the Netherlands, in June 1993. Precampaign public announcements addressed only melanoma and its precursor lesions. All attendees completed a detailed questionnaire addressing demographic particulars and specific fixed choice questions on their motivation to attend. There were 4,146 persons attending the screening clinics. Most attendees opted for examination of a specific lesion (71%). More females than males participated. Fear of having skin cancer was an important reason to participate (27%). Of all attenders, 16% had to be convinced by relatives or friends to attend the screens, and 33% would not have visited a physician on their own initiative when there had not been a free screening. Females were more concerned about skin cancer than males. The local and regional newspapers formed the most important precampaign publicity channel. Free melanoma screenings attract large numbers of people. Males are underrepresented. They are less aware of the risk profile of melanoma. Future screenings should target the male population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9394985     DOI: 10.2340/0001555577467470

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Derm Venereol        ISSN: 0001-5555            Impact factor:   4.437


  6 in total

Review 1.  Skin cancer-related prevention and screening behaviors: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Nadine A Kasparian; Jordana K McLoone; Bettina Meiser
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2009-06-12

Review 2.  Screening and early detection of skin cancer.

Authors:  Kenneth G Linden
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.075

3.  Skin examination behavior: the role of melanoma history, skin type, psychosocial factors, and region of residence in determining clinical and self-conducted skin examination.

Authors:  Nadine A Kasparian; Richard Bränström; Yu-mei Chang; Paul Affleck; Lisa G Aspinwall; Aad Tibben; Esther Azizi; Orna Baron-Epel; Linda Battistuzzi; William Bruno; May Chan; Francisco Cuellar; Tadeusz Debniak; Dace Pjanova; Slawomir Ertmanski; Adina Figl; Melinda Gonzalez; Nicholas K Hayward; Marko Hocevar; Peter A Kanetsky; Sancy Leachman; Wilma Bergman; Olita Heisele; Jane Palmer; Barbara Peric; Susana Puig; Dirk Schadendorf; Nelleke A Gruis; Julia Newton-Bishop; Yvonne Brandberg
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  2012-10

4.  When we should worry more: using cognitive bias modification to drive adaptive health behaviour.

Authors:  Lies Notebaert; Jessica Chrystal; Patrick J F Clarke; Emily A Holmes; Colin MacLeod
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Canadian Burden of Skin Disease From 1990 to 2017: Results From the Global Burden of Disease 2017 Study [Formula: see text].

Authors:  Alanna C Bridgman; Christina Fitzmaurice; Robert P Dellavalle; Chante Karimkhani Aksut; Ayman Grada; Mohsen Naghavi; Navid Manafi; Andrew T Olagunju; Tinuke O Olagunju; Ranjani Somayaji; Aaron M Drucker
Journal:  J Cutan Med Surg       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 2.092

6.  Proposal for an annual skin examination by a general practitioner for patients at high risk for melanoma: a French cohort study.

Authors:  Cédric Rat; Charlotte Grimault; Gaelle Quereux; Maelenn Dagorne; Aurélie Gaultier; Amir Khammari; Brigitte Dreno; Jean-Michel Nguyen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.