BACKGROUND: Inaccurate perceptions about whether a partner has concurrent sexual partners are associated with current sexually transmitted infections status. Despite high sexually transmitted infection rates among pregnant adolescents, studies have not investigated the accuracy of perceptions about sexual concurrency among young pregnant adolescents. The objectives were to assess (1) the accuracy of perceptions about whether one's partner ever had concurrent sexual partners during the relationship and (2) whether self-reported concurrency and relationship factors are related to inaccurate perceptions. METHODS: Sociodemographic, psychosocial, and sexual behavior data were collected from 296 couples recruited from antenatal clinics. Couples included pregnant adolescents, aged 14 to 21 years, and the father of the baby, aged ≥ 14 years. Percentage agreement and κ statistics assessed the accuracy of perceptions about whether one's partner ever had concurrent sexual partners during the relationship. Logistic regression models using generalized estimating equations assessed associations between respondents' self-reported concurrency, relationship factors, and inaccurate perceptions. RESULTS: Among participants whose partner was concurrent (n = 171), 60% did not accurately report their partner's concurrency, and greater relationship satisfaction (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 1.54) increased the likelihood of inaccuracy. Among participants with a nonconcurrent partner (n = 418), 17% were inaccurate; self-reported concurrency (AOR: 2.69) and greater partnership duration (AOR: 1.25) increased the likelihood of inaccuracy, whereas greater relationship satisfaction decreased the likelihood of inaccuracy (AOR: 0.68). CONCLUSIONS: Many pregnant adolescents and their partners inaccurately perceived their partner's concurrency status. Self-reported concurrency and relationship factors were associated with inaccuracy, reinforcing the need to improve sexual communication among this population.
BACKGROUND: Inaccurate perceptions about whether a partner has concurrent sexual partners are associated with current sexually transmitted infections status. Despite high sexually transmitted infection rates among pregnant adolescents, studies have not investigated the accuracy of perceptions about sexual concurrency among young pregnant adolescents. The objectives were to assess (1) the accuracy of perceptions about whether one's partner ever had concurrent sexual partners during the relationship and (2) whether self-reported concurrency and relationship factors are related to inaccurate perceptions. METHODS: Sociodemographic, psychosocial, and sexual behavior data were collected from 296 couples recruited from antenatal clinics. Couples included pregnant adolescents, aged 14 to 21 years, and the father of the baby, aged ≥ 14 years. Percentage agreement and κ statistics assessed the accuracy of perceptions about whether one's partner ever had concurrent sexual partners during the relationship. Logistic regression models using generalized estimating equations assessed associations between respondents' self-reported concurrency, relationship factors, and inaccurate perceptions. RESULTS: Among participants whose partner was concurrent (n = 171), 60% did not accurately report their partner's concurrency, and greater relationship satisfaction (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 1.54) increased the likelihood of inaccuracy. Among participants with a nonconcurrent partner (n = 418), 17% were inaccurate; self-reported concurrency (AOR: 2.69) and greater partnership duration (AOR: 1.25) increased the likelihood of inaccuracy, whereas greater relationship satisfaction decreased the likelihood of inaccuracy (AOR: 0.68). CONCLUSIONS: Many pregnant adolescents and their partners inaccurately perceived their partner's concurrency status. Self-reported concurrency and relationship factors were associated with inaccuracy, reinforcing the need to improve sexual communication among this population.
Authors: Trace S Kershaw; Kathleen A Ethier; Linda M Niccolai; Jessica B Lewis; Stephanie Milan; Christina Meade; Jeannette R Ickovics Journal: J Behav Med Date: 2010-07-04
Authors: Trace S Kershaw; Kathleen A Ethier; Linda M Niccolai; Jessica B Lewis; Jeannette R Ickovics Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Maria Trent; Hasiya Eihuri Yusuf; Julia Rowell; Jacquelin Toppins; Colin Woods; Steven Huettner; Camille Robinson; Errol L Fields; Arik V Marcell; Ralph DiClemente; Pamela Matson Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2022-05-25
Authors: Diana M Sanchez; Victor J Schoenbach; S Marie Harvey; Jocelyn T Warren; Adaora A Adimora; Charles Poole; Peter A Leone; Christopher R Agnew Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2015-11-16 Impact factor: 3.519
Authors: Anne-Marie Niekamp; Laura W L Spauwen; Nicole H T M Dukers-Muijrers; Christian J P A Hoebe Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2021-02-12 Impact factor: 3.090