BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: An individual's risk of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) has been associated empirically with the individual having concurrent sexual partners (individual's concurrency) and, theoretically, with the individual's partner having concurrent partners (partner's concurrency). GOALS: The goals of this study were to assess the relationship of STI to individual's concurrency, the partner's concurrency, and awareness of the partner's concurrency. STUDY DESIGN: We recruited 192 individuals aged 18 to 30 from sexually transmitted disease and family planning clinics in 96 partner dyads that reported first sexual contact during the previous 3 months. All individuals underwent computer interviews and testing for Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis. Individuals' self-reports of concurrency and perceptions of partners' concurrency were compared within dyads by kappa statistic; associations of STI with individual's concurrency, partner's concurrency, and knowledge of partner's concurrency were examined using chi-squared analysis, t tests, and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Only 26% of individuals whose partners had other partners were aware of this (kappa = 0.17 for agreement of perceptions vs. partners' reports of concurrency). In multivariate models, STI in individuals was independently associated with partners' concurrency (odds ratio [OR], 3.6), lack of awareness of partner's concurrency (OR, 4.5), perceiving a partner to have concurrent partners when the partner did not (OR, 4.7), living in south San Diego, and sexual contact within 1 week of acquaintance, but not with individuals' concurrency. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that STI is associated with partner's concurrency and with not knowing one's partner's behavior.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: An individual's risk of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) has been associated empirically with the individual having concurrent sexual partners (individual's concurrency) and, theoretically, with the individual's partner having concurrent partners (partner's concurrency). GOALS: The goals of this study were to assess the relationship of STI to individual's concurrency, the partner's concurrency, and awareness of the partner's concurrency. STUDY DESIGN: We recruited 192 individuals aged 18 to 30 from sexually transmitted disease and family planning clinics in 96 partner dyads that reported first sexual contact during the previous 3 months. All individuals underwent computer interviews and testing for Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis. Individuals' self-reports of concurrency and perceptions of partners' concurrency were compared within dyads by kappa statistic; associations of STI with individual's concurrency, partner's concurrency, and knowledge of partner's concurrency were examined using chi-squared analysis, t tests, and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Only 26% of individuals whose partners had other partners were aware of this (kappa = 0.17 for agreement of perceptions vs. partners' reports of concurrency). In multivariate models, STI in individuals was independently associated with partners' concurrency (odds ratio [OR], 3.6), lack of awareness of partner's concurrency (OR, 4.5), perceiving a partner to have concurrent partners when the partner did not (OR, 4.7), living in south San Diego, and sexual contact within 1 week of acquaintance, but not with individuals' concurrency. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that STI is associated with partner's concurrency and with not knowing one's partner's behavior.
Authors: Joan S Tucker; Gery W Ryan; Daniela Golinelli; Brett Ewing; Suzanne L Wenzel; David P Kennedy; Harold D Green; Annie Zhou Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2012-08
Authors: Adaora A Adimora; Victor J Schoenbach; Eboni M Taylor; Maria R Khan; Robert J Schwartz Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2010-08-19 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Anders Ragnarsson; Anna Mia Ekström; Jane Carter; Festus Ilako; Abigail Lukhwaro; Gaetano Marrone; Anna Thorson Journal: J Int AIDS Soc Date: 2011-04-18 Impact factor: 5.396
Authors: Keren Lehavot; Jodie G Katon; Emily C Williams; Karin M Nelson; Carolyn M Gardella; Gayle E Reiber; Tracy L Simpson Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2013-12-13 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Amanda E B Bryan; Jeanette Norris; Devon Alisa Abdallah; Tina Zawacki; Diane M Morrison; William H George; Kelly C Davis; Cinnamon L Danube; Cynthia A Stappenbeck Journal: Psychol Women Q Date: 2016-09-16
Authors: Fredrick Odhiambo Otieno; Richard Ndivo; Simon Oswago; Sherri Pals; Robert Chen; Timothy Thomas; Ernesta Kunneke; Lisa A Mills; Eleanor McLellan-Lemal Journal: Int J STD AIDS Date: 2014-05-08 Impact factor: 1.359
Authors: Andrea Swartzendruber; Jonathan M Zenilman; Linda M Niccolai; Trace S Kershaw; Jennifer L Brown; Ralph J Diclemente; Jessica M Sales Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Amy Nunn; Sarah MacCarthy; Nancy Barnett; Jennifer Rose; Philip Chan; Annajane Yolken; Alexandra Cornwall; Nicholas Chamberlain; Arti Barnes; Reginald Riggins; Elya Moore; Dantrell Simmons; Sharon Parker; Leandro Mena Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2014-12
Authors: Diana M Sanchez; Victor J Schoenbach; S Marie Harvey; Jocelyn T Warren; Adaora A Adimora; Charles Poole; Peter A Leone; Christopher R Agnew Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2015-11-16 Impact factor: 3.519