Literature DB >> 7935659

The use of levonorgestrel implants (Norplant) for contraception in adolescent mothers.

M Polaneczky1, G Slap, C Forke, A Rappaport, S Sondheimer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although levonorgestrel implants (Norplant) would appear to be a good contraceptive option for adolescent mothers, there is little information about the use of Norplant in this population.
METHODS: We studied 100 postpartum adolescents who chose a contraceptive method at an urban teaching hospital between September 1991 and July 1992. Structured interviews were conducted and medical records were reviewed soon after delivery and at a mean (+/- SD) of 15.5 +/- 2.9 months post partum.
RESULTS: Forty-eight of the adolescent mothers chose Norplant, 50 chose oral contraceptives, and 2 (not further studied) chose barrier methods of contraception. The factors significantly associated with the choice of Norplant were older age (16.7 years among those who chose Norplant, vs. 16.2 years among those who chose oral contraceptives), multiparity (24 subjects vs. 6 subjects), and previous use of oral contraceptives (34 subjects vs. 21 subjects). During follow-up, there were no differences between the Norplant group and the oral-contraceptive group in the frequency of clinic visits (an average of 2.3 visits per subject in each group), failure to return after the postpartum visit (9 subjects vs. 11 subjects), or the incidence of sexually transmitted diseases (42 percent vs. 36 percent). At follow-up, 95 percent of the subjects in the Norplant group and 33 percent of those in the oral-contraceptive group were still using the method they had chosen (P < 0.001). During the first postpartum year 1 subject in the Norplant group and 19 in the oral-contraceptive group became pregnant (P < 0.001). Norplant users did not differ from all other adolescents studied with regard to sexual activity or condom use.
CONCLUSIONS: The selection of Norplant by adolescent mothers as a method of contraception is associated with higher rates of continued use and lower rates of new pregnancy than the selection of oral contraceptives and does not affect the use of health care services, sexual activity, condom use, or the rate of sexually transmitted diseases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescent Pregnancy; Adolescents; Adolescents, Female; Age Factors; Americas; Contraception; Contraception Continuation; Contraceptive Agents; Contraceptive Agents, Female; Contraceptive Agents, Progestin; Contraceptive Effectiveness; Contraceptive Implants; Contraceptive Methods; Contraceptive Methods Chosen; Contraceptive Usage; Demographic Factors; Developed Countries; Family And Household; Family Characteristics; Family Planning; Family Relationships; Fertility; Health; Information; Information Processing; Interviews; Levonorgestrel; Mothers; North America; Northern America; Parents; Pennsylvania; Population; Population Characteristics; Population Dynamics; Prospective Studies; Records; Reproductive Behavior; Reproductive Health--women; Research Report; Studies; United States; Use-effectiveness; Youth

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7935659     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199411033311806

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  21 in total

1.  Condoms for dual protection: patterns of use with highly effective contraceptive methods.

Authors:  Karen Pazol; Michael R Kramer; Carol J Hogue
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Teen sex, AIDS, and contraception: part two.

Authors:  G Dawson
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 1.798

Review 3.  Directive counseling on long-acting contraception.

Authors:  E Moskowitz; B Jennings
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Contraceptive development and better family planning.

Authors:  S J Segal
Journal:  Bull N Y Acad Med       Date:  1996

5.  Teen sex, AIDS, and contraception: Part three.

Authors:  G Dawson
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 1.798

6.  Topics for our times: Norplant coercion--an overstated threat.

Authors:  A R Davidson; D Kalmuss
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Perceptions about sexual concurrency and factors related to inaccurate perceptions among pregnant adolescents and their partners.

Authors:  Andrea Swartzendruber; Linda M Niccolai; Jacky M Jennings; Jonathan M Zenilman; Anna A Divney; Urania Magriples; Trace S Kershaw
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.830

8.  Directive counseling should emphasize disease protection not pregnancy prevention.

Authors:  C A Pearson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Immediate Versus Delayed Insertion of the Levonorgestrel Intrauterine Device in Postpartum Adolescents: A Randomized Pilot Study.

Authors:  Reni Soon; Katie McGuire; Jennifer Salcedo; Bliss Kaneshiro
Journal:  Hawaii J Med Public Health       Date:  2018-03

10.  Norplant selection and satisfaction among low-income women.

Authors:  L L Clarke; K Schmitt; C A Bono; J Steele; M K Miller
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.