Literature DB >> 22801299

Evaluating tumor heterogeneity in immunohistochemistry-stained breast cancer tissue.

Steven J Potts1, Joseph S Krueger, Nicholas D Landis, David A Eberhard, G David Young, Steven C Schmechel, Holger Lange.   

Abstract

Quantitative clinical measurement of heterogeneity in immunohistochemistry staining would be useful in evaluating patient therapeutic response and in identifying underlying issues in histopathology laboratory quality control. A heterogeneity scoring approach (HetMap) was designed to visualize a individual patient's immunohistochemistry heterogeneity in the context of a patient population. HER2 semiquantitative analysis was combined with ecology diversity statistics to evaluate cell-level heterogeneity (consistency of protein expression within neighboring cells in a tumor nest) and tumor-level heterogeneity (differences of protein expression across a tumor as represented by a tissue section). This approach was evaluated on HER2 immunohistochemistry-stained breast cancer samples using 200 specimens across two different laboratories with three pathologists per laboratory, each outlining regions of tumor for scoring by automatic cell-based image analysis. HetMap was evaluated using three different scoring schemes: HER2 scoring according to American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) guidelines, H-score, and a new continuous HER2 score (HER2(cont)). Two definitions of heterogeneity, cell-level and tumor-level, provided useful independent measures of heterogeneity. Cases where pathologists had disagreement over reads in the area of clinical importance (+1 and +2) had statistically significantly higher levels of tumor-level heterogeneity. Cell-level heterogeneity, reported either as an average or the maximum area of heterogeneity across a slide, had low levels of dependency on the pathologist choice of region, while tumor-level heterogeneity measurements had more dependence on the pathologist choice of regions. HetMap is a measure of heterogeneity, by which pathologists, oncologists, and drug development organizations can view cell-level and tumor-level heterogeneity for a patient for a given marker in the context of an entire patient cohort. Heterogeneity analysis can be used to identify tumors with differing degrees of heterogeneity, or to highlight slides that should be rechecked for QC issues. Tumor heterogeneity plays a significant role in disconcordant reads between pathologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22801299     DOI: 10.1038/labinvest.2012.91

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lab Invest        ISSN: 0023-6837            Impact factor:   5.662


  51 in total

1.  A metric and workflow for quality control in the analysis of heterogeneity in phenotypic profiles and screens.

Authors:  Albert Gough; Tong Ying Shun; D Lansing Taylor; Mark Schurdak
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 3.608

2.  Bimodality of intratumor Ki67 expression is an independent prognostic factor of overall survival in patients with invasive breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Arvydas Laurinavicius; Benoit Plancoulaine; Allan Rasmusson; Justinas Besusparis; Renaldas Augulis; Raimundas Meskauskas; Paulette Herlin; Aida Laurinaviciene; Abir A Abdelhadi Muftah; Islam Miligy; Mohammed Aleskandarany; Emad A Rakha; Andrew R Green; Ian O Ellis
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 3.  Molecular and cellular heterogeneity in breast cancer: challenges for personalized medicine.

Authors:  Ashley G Rivenbark; Siobhan M O'Connor; William B Coleman
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 4.307

4.  Quantitative Imaging of Morphometric and Metabolic Signatures Reveals Heterogeneity in Drug Response of Three-Dimensional Mammary Tumor Spheroids.

Authors:  V Krishnan Ramanujan
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  A methodology for comprehensive breast cancer Ki67 labeling index with intra-tumor heterogeneity appraisal based on hexagonal tiling of digital image analysis data.

Authors:  Benoit Plancoulaine; Aida Laurinaviciene; Paulette Herlin; Justinas Besusparis; Raimundas Meskauskas; Indra Baltrusaityte; Yasir Iqbal; Arvydas Laurinavicius
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 4.064

6.  Quantitative assessment of pancreatic cancer precursor lesions in IHC-stained tissue with a tissue image analysis platform.

Authors:  Famke Aeffner; Nathan T Martin; Mirza Peljto; Joshua C Black; Justin K Major; Maryam Jangani; Michael O Ports; Joseph S Krueger; G David Young
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 5.662

Review 7.  Development of Companion Diagnostics.

Authors:  David A Mankoff; Christine E Edmonds; Michael D Farwell; Daniel A Pryma
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.446

8.  A Perspective on Implementing a Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Platform for Drug Discovery and the Advancement of Personalized Medicine.

Authors:  Andrew M Stern; Mark E Schurdak; Ivet Bahar; Jeremy M Berg; D Lansing Taylor
Journal:  J Biomol Screen       Date:  2016-03-08

9.  Combining fluorescence-based image segmentation and automated microfluidics for ultrafast cell-by-cell assessment of biomarkers for HER2-type breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Daniel Migliozzi; Huu T Nguyen; Martin A M Gijs
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 3.170

10.  Free digital image analysis software helps to resolve equivocal scores in HER2 immunohistochemistry.

Authors:  Henrik O Helin; Vilppu J Tuominen; Onni Ylinen; Heikki J Helin; Jorma Isola
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 4.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.