Literature DB >> 20398711

The correlation between acoustic cavitation and sonoporation involved in ultrasound-mediated DNA transfection with polyethylenimine (PEI) in vitro.

Yuanyuan Qiu1, Yi Luo, Yanli Zhang, Weicheng Cui, Dong Zhang, Junru Wu, Junfeng Zhang, Juan Tu.   

Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated that the efficiency of gene/drug delivery can be enhanced under ultrasound (US) exposure with the presence of US contrast agent microbubbles, due to the acoustic cavitation-induced sonoporation. However, obstacles still remain to achieve controllable sonoporation outcome. The general hypotheses guiding present studies were that inertial cavitation (IC) activities accumulated during US exposure could be quantified as IC dose (ICD) based on passive cavitation detection (PCD), and the assessment of sonoporation outcome should be correlated with ICD measurements. In current work, MCF-7 cells mixed with PEI:DNA complex and UCD microbubbles were exposed to 1-MHz US pulses with 20-cycle pulse and varied acoustic peak negative pressure (P(-); 0 (sham), 0.3, 0.75, 1.4, 2.2 or 3.0MPa), total treatment time (0, 5, 10, 20, 40 or 60s), and pulse-repetition-frequency (PRF; 0, 20, 100, 250, 500, or 1000Hz). Then, four series experiments were conducted: (1) the IC activities were detected using a PCD system and quantified as ICD; (2) the DNA transfection efficiency was evaluated with flow cytometry; (3) the cell viability was examined by PI dying then measured using flow cytometry; and (4) scan electron microscopy was used to investigate the sonoporation effects on the cell membrane. The results showed that: (1) the ICD generated during US exposure could be affected by US parameters (e.g., P(-), total treatment time, and PRF); (2) the pooled data analyses demonstrated that DNA transfection efficiency initially increased linearly with the increasing ICD, then it tended to saturate instead of trying to achieve a maximum value while the ICD kept going up; and (3) the measured ICD, sonoporation pore size, and cell viability exhibited high correlation among each other. All the results indicated that IC activity should play an important role in the US-mediated DNA transfection through sonoporation, and ICD could be used as an effective tool to monitor and control the US-mediated gene/drug delivery effect. 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20398711     DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.04.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Control Release        ISSN: 0168-3659            Impact factor:   9.776


  39 in total

1.  Contrast agent-free sonoporation: The use of an ultrasonic standing wave microfluidic system for the delivery of pharmaceutical agents.

Authors:  Dario Carugo; Dyan N Ankrett; Peter Glynne-Jones; Lorenzo Capretto; Rosemary J Boltryk; Xunli Zhang; Paul A Townsend; Martyn Hill
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 2.800

2.  Polyplex-microbubble hybrids for ultrasound-guided plasmid DNA delivery to solid tumors.

Authors:  Shashank R Sirsi; Sonia L Hernandez; Lukasz Zielinski; Henning Blomback; Adel Koubaa; Milo Synder; Shunichi Homma; Jessica J Kandel; Darrell J Yamashiro; Mark A Borden
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2011-09-17       Impact factor: 9.776

3.  Efficient microbubble- and ultrasound-mediated plasmid DNA delivery into a specific rat liver lobe via a targeted injection and acoustic exposure using a novel ultrasound system.

Authors:  Shuxian Song; Misty Noble; Samuel Sun; Liping Chen; Andrew A Brayman; Carol H Miao
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 4.  Degradable Controlled-Release Polymers and Polymeric Nanoparticles: Mechanisms of Controlling Drug Release.

Authors:  Nazila Kamaly; Basit Yameen; Jun Wu; Omid C Farokhzad
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 60.622

5.  Markedly enhanced skeletal muscle transfection achieved by the ultrasound-targeted delivery of non-viral gene nanocarriers with microbubbles.

Authors:  Caitlin W Burke; Jung Soo Suk; Anthony J Kim; Yu-Han J Hsiang; Alexander L Klibanov; Justin Hanes; Richard J Price
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 9.776

6.  Shock Wave-Induced Damage and Poration in Eukaryotic Cell Membranes.

Authors:  Luz M López-Marín; Blanca E Millán-Chiu; Karen Castaño-González; Carmen Aceves; Francisco Fernández; Alfredo Varela-Echavarría; Achim M Loske
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 1.843

7.  Closed-loop control of targeted ultrasound drug delivery across the blood-brain/tumor barriers in a rat glioma model.

Authors:  Tao Sun; Yongzhi Zhang; Chanikarn Power; Phillip M Alexander; Jonathan T Sutton; Muna Aryal; Natalia Vykhodtseva; Eric L Miller; Nathan J McDannold
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  A novel dual-targeted ultrasound contrast agent provides improvement of gene delivery efficiency in vitro.

Authors:  Jinfeng Xu; Xinxin Zeng; Yingying Liu; Hui Luo; Zhanghong Wei; Huiyu Liu; Yuli Zhou; Hairong Zheng; Jie Zhou; Guanghong Tan; Fei Yan
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2016-01-06

9.  The impact of bubbles on measurement of drug release from echogenic liposomes.

Authors:  Jonathan A Kopechek; Kevin J Haworth; Kirthi Radhakrishnan; Shao-Ling Huang; Melvin E Klegerman; David D McPherson; Christy K Holland
Journal:  Ultrason Sonochem       Date:  2012-12-29       Impact factor: 7.491

10.  Sonoporation-enhanced chemotherapy significantly reduces primary tumour burden in an orthotopic pancreatic cancer xenograft.

Authors:  Spiros Kotopoulis; Anthony Delalande; Mihaela Popa; Veronika Mamaeva; Georg Dimcevski; Odd Helge Gilja; Michiel Postema; Bjørn Tore Gjertsen; Emmet McCormack
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.488

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.