BACKGROUND: Monoclonal antibodies directed at IgE demonstrate clinical efficacy in subjects with peanut allergy, but previous studies have not addressed the kinetics of the clinical response or the role of mast cells and basophils in the food-induced allergic response. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the kinetics of the clinical response to omalizumab and whether clinical improvement is associated with either mast cell or basophil suppression. METHODS:Subjects with peanut allergy were treated with omalizumab for 6 months and assessed for clinical and cellular responses. At baseline, subjects had a double-blind, placebo-controlled oral food challenge (OFC), skin prick test titration (SPTT), and basophil histamine release (BHR) to peanut. BHR was repeated at week 2 and then weekly until it decreased to less than 20% of baseline values. The OFCs and SPTTs were repeated after the BHR reduction (or at week 8 if BHR did not decrease) and again at 6 months. RESULTS:Fourteen subjects enrolled in the study. At the second food challenge, there was a significant increase in the threshold dose of peanut inducing allergic symptoms (80 to 6500 mg, P < .01). Peanut-induced BHR was either completely suppressed (n = 5) or 10-fold more allergen was required to induce maximal BHR (n = 9), and SPTT responses were not significantly changed from baseline. After 6 months of omalizumab, further changes in the OFC threshold dose or BHR were not observed, but a significant suppression in SPTTs was identified. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical response to omalizumab occurs early in treatment when the basophil, but not the mast cell, is suppressed, supporting a role for the basophil in acute food reactions.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Monoclonal antibodies directed at IgE demonstrate clinical efficacy in subjects with peanutallergy, but previous studies have not addressed the kinetics of the clinical response or the role of mast cells and basophils in the food-induced allergic response. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the kinetics of the clinical response to omalizumab and whether clinical improvement is associated with either mast cell or basophil suppression. METHODS: Subjects with peanutallergy were treated with omalizumab for 6 months and assessed for clinical and cellular responses. At baseline, subjects had a double-blind, placebo-controlled oral food challenge (OFC), skin prick test titration (SPTT), and basophil histamine release (BHR) to peanut. BHR was repeated at week 2 and then weekly until it decreased to less than 20% of baseline values. The OFCs and SPTTs were repeated after the BHR reduction (or at week 8 if BHR did not decrease) and again at 6 months. RESULTS: Fourteen subjects enrolled in the study. At the second food challenge, there was a significant increase in the threshold dose of peanut inducing allergic symptoms (80 to 6500 mg, P < .01). Peanut-induced BHR was either completely suppressed (n = 5) or 10-fold more allergen was required to induce maximal BHR (n = 9), and SPTT responses were not significantly changed from baseline. After 6 months of omalizumab, further changes in the OFC threshold dose or BHR were not observed, but a significant suppression in SPTTs was identified. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical response to omalizumab occurs early in treatment when the basophil, but not the mast cell, is suppressed, supporting a role for the basophil in acute food reactions.
Authors: Hugh A Sampson; Donald Y M Leung; A Wesley Burks; Gideon Lack; Sami L Bahna; Stacie M Jones; Dennis A Wong Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2011-03-11 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: William W Busse; Wayne J Morgan; Peter J Gergen; Herman E Mitchell; James E Gern; Andrew H Liu; Rebecca S Gruchalla; Meyer Kattan; Stephen J Teach; Jacqueline A Pongracic; James F Chmiel; Suzanne F Steinbach; Agustin Calatroni; Alkis Togias; Katherine M Thompson; Stanley J Szefler; Christine A Sorkness Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-03-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Becky M Vonakis; Kavitha Vasagar; Scott P Gibbons; Laura Gober; Patricia M Sterba; Hyeyoun Chang; Sarbjit S Saini Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2006-11-27 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: S S Saini; J J Richardson; C Wofsy; S Lavens-Phillips; B S Bochner; D W Macglashan Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2001-05 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Donald Y M Leung; Hugh A Sampson; John W Yunginger; A Wesley Burks; Lynda C Schneider; Cornelis H Wortel; Frances M Davis; John D Hyun; William R Shanahan Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-03-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Kari C Nadeau; Lynda C Schneider; Lisa Hoyte; Irene Borras; Dale T Umetsu Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2011-05-04 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Emily C McGowan; Jessica H Savage; Jean-Paul Courneya; Patricia M Sterba; Saitu Parihar; Jing Lin; Gustavo Gimenez; Hugh A Sampson; John Schroeder; Donald MacGlashan; Robert A Wood; Robert G Hamilton; Sarbjit Saini Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2014-06-27 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: François Graham; Natacha Tardio; Louis Paradis; Anne Des Roches; Philippe Bégin Journal: Hum Vaccin Immunother Date: 2017-10-03 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Hans Jürgen Hoffmann; Edward F Knol; Martha Ferrer; Lina Mayorga; Vito Sabato; Alexandra F Santos; Bernadette Eberlein; Anna Nopp; Donald MacGlashan Journal: Curr Allergy Asthma Rep Date: 2016-07 Impact factor: 4.806
Authors: James S Pearson; Robert M Niven; Jie Meng; Sima Atarodi; Peter J Whorwell Journal: Therap Adv Gastroenterol Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 4.409