| Literature DB >> 22799883 |
Mikael R Andersen1, Malene Giese, Ronald P de Vries, Jens Nielsen.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The degradation of plant materials by enzymes is an industry of increasing importance. For sustainable production of second generation biofuels and other products of industrial biotechnology, efficient degradation of non-edible plant polysaccharides such as hemicellulose is required. For each type of hemicellulose, a complex mixture of enzymes is required for complete conversion to fermentable monosaccharides. In plant-biomass degrading fungi, these enzymes are regulated and released by complex regulatory structures. In this study, we present a methodology for evaluating the potential of a given fungus for polysaccharide degradation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22799883 PMCID: PMC3542576 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-313
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Figure 1Schematic representation of soluble galactoglucomannan. The nature of the bonds between the sugar units are noted where they are known. The number of sides on the sugar polygons reflect the number of carbons of the sugar. The first carbon is indicated on all sugars with a 1 to clarify the bond configurations. Carbons are numbered clockwise from the first carbon with the two last carbons of the sugar (hexose or pentose) on the same corner of the polygon. The oligos are hypothetical hydrolysis products and sugars that appear due to the action of exo-acting enzymes. The structure is based on the reportings of refs. [18-21].
Extract of Additional file 17: Table S6 of the enzymatic activities required for the degradation of soluble galactoglucomannan by
| | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.2.1.78 | Endo-1,4- | GH5 | [ | [ | | | An05g01320 | 50378 |
| 3.2.1.78 | Endo-1,4- | GH26 | | | | | An15g07760 | 40875 |
| 3.2.1.25 | GH2 | | | | | An01g06630 | 172587 | |
| 3.2.1.25 | GH2 | [ | [ | Q9UUZ3 | An11g06540 | 138876 | ||
| 3.2.1.22 | GH36 | [ | [ | Q9UUZ4 | An09g00260 | 212736 | ||
| 3.2.1.22 | GH27 | | | | | An01g01320 | 172232 | |
| 3.2.1.22 | GH27 | [ | | Q9Y865 | An02g11150 | 207264 | ||
| 3.2.1.22 | GH27 | [ | | A2QL72 | An06g00170 | 37736 | ||
| 3.2.1.21 | GH3 | | | | | An15g04800 | 181816 | |
| 3.2.1.21 | GH3 | | | | | An17g00520 | 129891 | |
| 3.2.1.21 | GH3 | [ | | A2RAL4 | An18g03570 | 56782 | ||
| 3.2.1.23 | GH35 | | | | | An01g10350 | 46429 | |
| 3.2.1.23 | GH35 | | | | | An14g05820 | 41910 | |
| 3.2.1.23 | GH35 | [ | | P29853 | An01g12150 | 51764 | ||
| 3.1.1.6 | Acetyl esterase | CE16 | An02g02540 | N/A | ||||
For each isoenzyme, putative or characterized, is noted literature references and the gene ID in the sequencings of A. niger CBS 513.88 and ATCC 1015. CAZy families are shown in the CAZy columnn [37], The list of necessary enzymes are gathered from the work described in refs. [18-21].
Biomass and sugar concentrations at the time of RNA-sampling from cultivations on six different carbon sources
| | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| | ||||
| Arabinan | 4.28±0.42 | 0.00±0.00 | 5.79±2.33 | - |
| Arabinose | 5.72±0.30 | 0.00±0.00 | 45.03±6.79 | 0.00±0.00 |
| Glucose | 6.49±0.96 | - | - | 34.75±4.66 |
| Starch | 7.49±0.60 | - | - | 23.48±0.56 |
| Xylan | 9.00±0.36 | 4.40±0.60 | 0.80±0.73 | - |
| Xylose | 6.24±0.21 | 42.56±19.45 | - | - |
All values are shown as average±standard deviation. Cells marked with - were not measured.
Overview of significantly regulated genes between cultivations on six different carbon sources
| | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 991 (318 | 220 (110 | 1281(1048 | 25 (6 | 92 (16 | |
| 1087 (375 | 27 (17 | 1874 (1485 | 59 (50 | | |
| 387 (109 | 124 (52 | 1844 (1449 | | | |
| 2999 (509 | 1936 (473 | | | | |
| 361 (127 | |||||
The first number in the cells is the number of significantly regulated genes in the pairwise comparison of the carbon sources in the top row and left column. The number marked with an ↑are the genes that are up-regulated on the carbon source in the top row relative to the one in the left column, while the number with an ↓denotes the opposite.
Figure 2Clustering of 161 putative and characterized genes coding for polysaccharide-active enzymes according to expression profiles. The number of genes in each cluster is shown next to the cluster number. The gene names of known genes found in a particular cluster are found in each cluster. The genes were clustered using the ClusterLustre algorithm [50].
Figure 3Map of starch-degrading enzymes in cluster 5. Genes marked with a red box are found in the cluster, gray boxes means that the gene is found in the A. niger CBS 513.88 sequence, but no bi-directional best hit is found in the A. niger ATCC 1015 sequence.