OBJECTIVES: To prospectively assess the technical performance of an augmented reality system for MR-guided spinal injection procedures. METHODS: The augmented reality system was used with a clinical 1.5-T MRI system. A total of 187 lumbosacral spinal injection procedures (epidural injection, spinal nerve root injection, facet joint injection, medial branch block, discography) were performed in 12 human cadavers. Needle paths were planned with the Perk Station module of 3D Slicer software on high-resolution MR images. Needles were placed under augmented reality MRI navigation. MRI was used to confirm needle locations. T1-weighted fat-suppressed MRI was used to visualise the injectant. Outcome variables assessed were needle adjustment rate, inadvertent puncture of non-targeted structures, successful injection rate and procedure time. RESULTS: Needle access was achieved in 176/187 (94.1 %) targets, whereas 11/187 (5.9 %) were inaccessible. Six of 11 (54.5 %) L5-S1 disks were inaccessible, because of an axial obliquity of 30˚ (27˚-34˚); 5/11 (45.5 %) facet joints were inaccessible because of osteoarthritis or fusion. All accessible targets (176/187, 94.1 %) were successfully injected, requiring 47/176 (26.7 %) needle adjustments. There were no inadvertent punctures of vulnerable structures. Median procedure time was 10.2 min (5-19 min). CONCLUSIONS: Image overlay navigated MR-guided spinal injections were technically accurate. Disks with an obliquity ≥27˚ may be inaccessible.
OBJECTIVES: To prospectively assess the technical performance of an augmented reality system for MR-guided spinal injection procedures. METHODS: The augmented reality system was used with a clinical 1.5-T MRI system. A total of 187 lumbosacral spinal injection procedures (epidural injection, spinal nerve root injection, facet joint injection, medial branch block, discography) were performed in 12 human cadavers. Needle paths were planned with the Perk Station module of 3D Slicer software on high-resolution MR images. Needles were placed under augmented reality MRI navigation. MRI was used to confirm needle locations. T1-weighted fat-suppressed MRI was used to visualise the injectant. Outcome variables assessed were needle adjustment rate, inadvertent puncture of non-targeted structures, successful injection rate and procedure time. RESULTS: Needle access was achieved in 176/187 (94.1 %) targets, whereas 11/187 (5.9 %) were inaccessible. Six of 11 (54.5 %) L5-S1 disks were inaccessible, because of an axial obliquity of 30˚ (27˚-34˚); 5/11 (45.5 %) facet joints were inaccessible because of osteoarthritis or fusion. All accessible targets (176/187, 94.1 %) were successfully injected, requiring 47/176 (26.7 %) needle adjustments. There were no inadvertent punctures of vulnerable structures. Median procedure time was 10.2 min (5-19 min). CONCLUSIONS: Image overlay navigated MR-guided spinal injections were technically accurate. Disks with an obliquity ≥27˚ may be inaccessible.
Authors: G A Krombach; T Schmitz-Rode; B B Wein; J Meyer; J E Wildberger; K Brabant; R W Günther Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2000-11 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: John A Carrino; Jon D Lurie; Anna N A Tosteson; Tor D Tosteson; Eugene J Carragee; Jay Kaiser; Margaret R Grove; Emily Blood; Loretta H Pearson; James N Weinstein; Richard Herzog Journal: Radiology Date: 2008-10-27 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: J S Lewin; C A Petersilge; S F Hatem; J L Duerk; G Lenz; M E Clampitt; M L Williams; K R Kaczynski; C F Lanzieri; A L Wise; J R Haaga Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 1998-06 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: F Streitparth; T Walter; U Wonneberger; S Chopra; F Wichlas; M Wagner; K G Hermann; B Hamm; U Teichgräber Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2009-09-02 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: M Anand; F King; T Ungi; A Lasso; J Rudan; J Jayender; J Fritz; J A Carrino; F A Jolesz; G Fichtinger Journal: Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc Date: 2014
Authors: David R Marker; Paweena U-Thainual; Tamas Ungi; Aaron J Flammang; Gabor Fichtinger; Iulian I Iordachita; John A Carrino; Jan Fritz Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2016-01-20 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Nadja A Farshad-Amacker; Till Bay; Andrea B Rosskopf; José M Spirig; Florian Wanivenhaus; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Mazda Farshad Journal: Eur Radiol Exp Date: 2020-02-04