Literature DB >> 28374329

The prevalence of tandem spinal stenosis and its characteristics in a population-based MRI study: The Wakayama Spine Study.

Keiji Nagata1, Noriko Yoshimura2, Hiroshi Hashizume3, Yuyu Ishimoto1, Shigeyuki Muraki2, Hiroshi Yamada1, Hiroyuki Oka4, Hiroshi Kawaguchi5, Toru Akune6, Sakae Tanaka7, Kozo Nakamura6, Munehito Yoshida1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Tandem spinal stenosis (TSS) is a condition of combined spinal stenosis in the cervical and lumbar regions. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of radiographic TSS and its association with developmental canal stenosis (DCS). The second purpose was to investigate the extent to which radiographic TSS is associated with cervical myelopathy and symptomatic LSS.
METHODS: We recruited 1011 (336 men and 675 women) participants in this population-based study. After excluding those with a pacemaker, a history of cervical or lumbar surgery, disqualification, the MRI data of whole spine was analysed in 931 (mean, 67.3 years) participants. Cervical cord compression (CCC) and radiographic lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) were evaluated by MRI. The canal-to-body ratio was also measured by plain X-ray. DCS was diagnosed as canal-to-body ratio <0.75. The diagnosis of cervical myelopathy and symptomatic LSS was made by presentation of both symptoms and radiographic compression using MRI.
RESULTS: The prevalence of CCC was 24.7%, that of radiographic LSS was 30.2%, and that of radiographic TSS was 11.0% (men, 14.1%; women, 9.4%). The prevalence of TSS was significantly higher in the DCS group than in the non-DCS group (p < 0.001). Among the participants with radiographic TSS, the prevalence of cervical myelopathy and symptomatic LSS was 9.8 and 18.6%, respectively. The coexisting cervical myelopathy and symptomatic LSS was 6.1% in the participants with LSS.
CONCLUSIONS: The present study is the first population-based study to clarify TSS characteristic using whole-spine MRI.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Canal-to-body ratio; Cervical cord compression; Developmental canal stenosis; Lumbar spinal stenosis; Tandem spinal stenosis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28374329     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-017-5072-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  15 in total

1.  Asymptomatic cervical cord compression in lumbar spinal stenosis patients: a whole spine magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Sang-Hun Lee; Ki-Tack Kim; Kyung-Soo Suk; Jung-Hee Lee; Jae-Hung Shin; Dong-Hyuk So; Yoon-Ho Kwack
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Predictive factors of cervical spondylotic myelopathy in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Hideki Iizuka; Keisuke Takahashi; Shinya Tanaka; Kohei Kawamura; Yoshitomo Okano; Hiromi Oda
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Is lumbar stenosis associated with thoracic stenosis? A study of 1,072 human cadaveric specimens.

Authors:  Navkirat S Bajwa; Jason O Toy; Nicholas U Ahn
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 4.166

4.  A novel MRI classification system for congenital functional lumbar spinal stenosis predicts the risk for tandem cervical spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Carola F van Eck; Nicholas T Spina Iii; Joon Y Lee
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Measurement properties of a self-administered outcome measure in lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  G Stucki; L Daltroy; M H Liang; S J Lipson; A H Fossel; J N Katz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Tandem lumbar and cervical spinal stenosis. Natural history, prognostic indices, and results after surgical decompression.

Authors:  T F Dagi; M A Tarkington; J J Leech
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  Is congenital bony stenosis of the cervical spine associated with lumbar spine stenosis? An anatomical study of 1072 human cadaveric specimens.

Authors:  Navkirat S Bajwa; Jason O Toy; Ernest Y Young; Nicholas U Ahn
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2012-04-27

8.  Associations between radiographic lumbar spinal stenosis and clinical symptoms in the general population: the Wakayama Spine Study.

Authors:  Y Ishimoto; N Yoshimura; S Muraki; H Yamada; K Nagata; H Hashizume; N Takiguchi; A Minamide; H Oka; H Kawaguchi; K Nakamura; T Akune; M Yoshida
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 6.576

Review 9.  Management of asymptomatic cervical spinal stenosis in the setting of symptomatic tandem lumbar stenosis: a review.

Authors:  George M Ghobrial; Mark E Oppenlander; Christopher M Maulucci; Matthew Viereck; Srinivas Prasad; Ashwini D Sharan; James S Harrop
Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 1.876

10.  The prevalence of cervical myelopathy among subjects with narrow cervical spinal canal in a population-based magnetic resonance imaging study: the Wakayama Spine Study.

Authors:  Keiji Nagata; Noriko Yoshimura; Hiroshi Hashizume; Shigeyuki Muraki; Yuyu Ishimoto; Hiroshi Yamada; Noboru Takiguchi; Yukihiro Nakagawa; Akihito Minamide; Hiroyuki Oka; Hiroshi Kawaguchi; Kozo Nakamura; Toru Akune; Munehito Yoshida
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2014-04-05       Impact factor: 4.166

View more
  7 in total

1.  Primary cervical decompression surgery may improve lumbar symptoms in patients with tandem spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Taro Inoue; Kei Ando; Kazuyoshi Kobayashi; Hiroaki Nakashima; Keigo Ito; Yoshito Katayama; Masaaki Machino; Shunsuke Kanbara; Sadayuki Ito; Hidetoshi Yamaguchi; Hiroyuki Koshimizu; Naoki Segi; Fumihiko Kato; Shiro Imagama
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal Review : A survey of the "medical" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2017.

Authors:  Michel Benoist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Staged surgery for tandem cervical and lumbar spinal stenosis: Which should be treated first?

Authors:  Chi-An Luo; Arun-Kumar Kaliya-Perumal; Meng-Ling Lu; Lih-Huei Chen; Wen-Jer Chen; Chi-Chien Niu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Transcranial electrical stimulation motor-evoked potentials rescue from postoperative neurological deficit due to inadequate neck position for the case of lumbar surgery with asymptomatic cervical stenosis.

Authors:  Hideki Shigematsu; Tomoshige Miyabayashi; Sachiko Kawasaki; Yuma Suga; Yasuhito Tanaka
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Radiographic predictors for recurrence of lumbar symptoms after prioritized cervical surgery in patients with tandem spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Zhuanghui Wang; Wu Ye; Yufeng Zhu; Pengyu Tang; Weihua Cai
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 2.721

6.  Simultaneous or Staged Decompressions for Patients with Tandem Spinal Stenosis.

Authors:  Wei-Zong Sun; Xu Yan; Ya-Lin Yang; Hong Song; Zi-Wei Xia; Shi-Chang Yang; Fu-Lin Chen; Wen-Hui Li; Zi-Qi Yu; Bin Liu; Yu-Xin Liu; Kai Wang; Liang Zhang
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 2.071

Review 7.  Current understanding of tandem spinal stenosis: epidemiology, diagnosis, and surgical strategy.

Authors:  Qiushi Bai; Yuanyi Wang; Jiliang Zhai; Jigong Wu; Yan Zhang; Yu Zhao
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2022-08-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.