Literature DB >> 22795863

Clinical investigation of the interface pressure in the trans-tibial socket with Dermo and Seal-In X5 liner during walking and their effect on patient satisfaction.

Sadeeq Ali1, Noor Azuan Abu Osman, Niyousha Mortaza, Arezoo Eshraghi, Hossein Gholizadeh, Wan Abu Bakar Bin Wan Abas.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The interface pressure between the residual limb and prosthetic socket has a significant effect on an amputee's satisfaction and comfort. Liners provide a comfortable interface by adding a soft cushion between the residual limb and the socket. The Dermo and the Seal-In X5 liner are two new interface systems and, due to their relative infancy, very little are known about their effect on patient satisfaction. The aim of this study was to compare the interface pressure with these two liners and their effect on patient satisfaction.
METHODS: Nine unilateral transtibial amputees participated in the study. Two prostheses were fabricated for each amputee, one with the Seal-In liner and one with the Dermo liner. Interface pressure was measured at the anterior, posterior, medial and lateral regions during walking on the level ground. Each subject filled in a Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ) regarding the satisfaction with the two liners. Findings The mean peak pressures with the Seal-In liner was 34.0% higher at the anterior, 24.0% higher at the posterior and 7.0% higher at the medial regions of the socket (P=0.008, P=0.046, P=0.025) than it was with the Dermo Liner. There were no significant differences in the mean peak pressures between the two liners at the lateral regions. In addition, significant difference was found between the two liners both for satisfaction and problems (P<0.05). Interpretation There was less interface pressure between the socket and the residual limb with the Dermo liner. The results indicated that the Dermo liner provides more comfort in the socket than the Seal-In liner.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22795863     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2012.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  14 in total

1.  Development of Standardized Material Testing Protocols for Prosthetic Liners.

Authors:  John C Cagle; Per G Reinhall; Brian J Hafner; Joan E Sanders
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  A finite element model to assess transtibial prosthetic sockets with elastomeric liners.

Authors:  John C Cagle; Per G Reinhall; Kate J Allyn; Jake McLean; Paul Hinrichs; Brian J Hafner; Joan E Sanders
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Developing a control framework for self-adjusting prosthetic sockets incorporating tissue injury risk estimation and generalized predictive control.

Authors:  F M Mbithi; A J Chipperfield; J W Steer; A S Dickinson
Journal:  Biomed Eng Lett       Date:  2021-12-02

4.  Self-reported socket comfort, mobility, and balance-confidence of individuals with transtibial amputation using pinlock vs suction suspension.

Authors:  Mayank Seth; Emma Haldane Beisheim; Maximilian Tobias Spencer; John Robert Horne; Frank Bernard Sarlo; Jaclyn Megan Sions
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 1.672

5.  Gait biomechanics of individuals with transtibial amputation: effect of suspension system.

Authors:  Arezoo Eshraghi; Noor Azuan Abu Osman; Mohammad Karimi; Hossein Gholizadeh; Ehsan Soodmand; Wan Abu Bakar Wan Abas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Clinical implication of interface pressure for a new prosthetic suspension system.

Authors:  Hossein Gholizadeh; Noor Azuan Abu Osman; Arezoo Eshraghi; Nasrul Anuar Abd Razak
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 2.819

7.  Comparative study between Dermo, Pelite, and Seal-In X5 liners: effect on patient's satisfaction and perceived problems.

Authors:  Sadeeq Ali; Noor Azuan Abu Osman; Nooranida Arifin; Hossein Gholizadeh; Nasrul Anwar Abd Razak; Wan Abu Bakar Wan Abas
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-08-11

8.  The effects of suction and pin/lock suspension systems on transtibial amputees' gait performance.

Authors:  Hossein Gholizadeh; Noor Azuan Abu Osman; Arezoo Eshraghi; Sadeeq Ali
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Development of an air pneumatic suspension system for transtibial prostheses.

Authors:  Gholamhossein Pirouzi; Noor Azuan Abu Osman; Azim Ataollahi Oshkour; Sadeeq Ali; Hossein Gholizadeh; Wan A B Wan Abas
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 10.  Techniques for Interface Stress Measurements within Prosthetic Sockets of Transtibial Amputees: A Review of the Past 50 Years of Research.

Authors:  Ebrahim A Al-Fakih; Noor Azuan Abu Osman; Faisal Rafiq Mahmad Adikan
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.