Literature DB >> 22791941

Ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head: a focus on current diagnostic and surgical concepts.

Mehdi Ouaïssi1, Urs Giger, Guillaume Louis, Igor Sielezneff, Olivier Farges, Bernard Sastre.   

Abstract

Complete surgical resection still remains the only possibility of curing pancreatic cancer, however, only 10% of patients undergo curative surgery. Pancreatic resection currently remains the only method of curing patients, and has a 5-year overall survival rate between 7%-34% compared to a median survival of 3-11 mo for unresected cancer. Pancreatic surgery is a technically demanding procedure requiring highly standardized surgical techniques. Nevertheless, even in experienced hands, perioperative morbidity rates (delayed gastric emptying, pancreatic fistula etc.) are as high as 50%. Different strategies to reduce postoperative morbidity, such as different techniques of gastroenteric reconstruction (pancreatico-jejunostomy vs pancreatico-gastrostomy), intraoperative placement of a pancreatic main duct stent or temporary sealing of the main pancreatic duct with fibrin glue have not led to a significant improvement in clinical outcome. The perioperative application of somatostatin or its analogues may decrease the incidence of pancreatic fistulas in cases with soft pancreatic tissue and a small main pancreatic duct (< 3 mm). The positive effects of external pancreatic main duct drainage and antecolic gastrointestinal reconstruction have been observed to decrease the rate of pancreatic fistulas and delayed gastric emptying, respectively. Currently, the concept of extended radical lymphadenectomy has been found to be associated with higher perioperative morbidity, but without any positive impact on overall survival. However, there is growing evidence that portal vein resections can be performed with acceptable low perioperative morbidity and mortality but does not achieve a cure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pancreatic adenocarcinoma; Pancreatic fistula; Pancreatic surgery; Venous resection

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22791941      PMCID: PMC3386319          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i24.3058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  104 in total

Review 1.  Is pancreaticoduodenectomy with mesentericoportal venous resection safe and worthwhile?

Authors:  P Bachellier; H Nakano; P D Oussoultzoglou; J C Weber; K Boudjema; P D Wolf; D Jaeck
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Utility of staging laparoscopy in subsets of peripancreatic and biliary malignancies.

Authors:  Charles M Vollmer; Jeffrey A Drebin; William D Middleton; Sharlene A Teefey; David C Linehan; Nathaniel J Soper; Christopher J Eagon; Steven M Strasberg
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Somatostatin and octreotide in the prevention of postoperative pancreatic complications and the treatment of enterocutaneous pancreatic fistulas: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  J Li-Ling; M Irving
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Bacteribilia and cholangitis after percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage for malignant biliary obstruction.

Authors:  T Nomura; Y Shirai; K Hatakeyama
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 5.  Laparoscopy in the staging of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  P W Pisters; J E Lee; J N Vauthey; C Charnsangavej; D B Evans
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Duct-penetrating sign at MRCP: usefulness for differentiating inflammatory pancreatic mass from pancreatic carcinomas.

Authors:  T Ichikawa; H Sou; T Araki; A S Arbab; T Yoshikawa; K Ishigame; H Haradome; J Hachiya
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Prospective randomized clinical trial of the value of intraperitoneal drainage after pancreatic resection.

Authors:  K C Conlon; D Labow; D Leung; A Smith; W Jarnagin; D G Coit; N Merchant; M F Brennan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Cancer statistics, 2002.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Andrea Thomas; Taylor Murray; Michael Thun
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

9.  Pancreatic cancer detection with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a prospective controlled study.

Authors:  H E Adamek; J Albert; H Breer; M Weitz; D Schilling; J F Riemann
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-07-15       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Functional and morphological changes in the pancreatic remnant following pancreaticoduodenectomy with pancreaticogastric anastomosis.

Authors:  E Lemaire; D O'Toole; A Sauvanet; P Hammel; J Belghiti; P Ruszniewski
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  4 in total

1.  Novel diagnostics for aggravating pancreatic fistulas at the acute phase after pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Mitsuro Kanda; Tsutomu Fujii; Hideki Takami; Masaya Suenaga; Yoshikuni Inokawa; Suguru Yamada; Daisuke Kobayashi; Chie Tanaka; Hiroyuki Sugimoto; Masahiko Koike; Shuji Nomoto; Michitaka Fujiwara; Yasuhiro Kodera
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Impact of body mass index on complications following pancreatectomy: Ten-year experience at National Cancer Center in China.

Authors:  Ying-Tai Chen; Qian Deng; Xu Che; Jian-Wei Zhang; Yu-Heng Chen; Dong-Bin Zhao; Yan-Tao Tian; Ya-Wei Zhang; Cheng-Feng Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-06-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Connexins and pannexins in the skeleton: gap junctions, hemichannels and more.

Authors:  Lilian I Plotkin; Joseph P Stains
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 9.261

4.  Pancreatic fistulae after a pancreatico-duodenectomy: are pancreatico-gastrostomies safer than pancreatico-jejunostomies? An expertise-based trial and propensity-score adjusted analysis.

Authors:  Jad Abou Khalil; Nancy Mayo; Sinziana Dumitra; Mohammed Jamal; Prosanto Chaudhury; Peter Metrakos; Jeffrey Barkun
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 3.647

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.