BACKGROUND: Whether or not superior mesentericoportal venous resection (SM-PVR) associated with pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is safe and worthwhile has not been fully confirmed. The aim of the present study was to investigate results of this surgical procedure performed for pancreatic head and periampullary neoplasms. METHODS: As a first analysis, postoperative morbidity and mortality after PD with (n = 31) or without SM-PVR (n = 119) were investigated in 150 patients with pancreatic head and periampullary neoplasms. As a second analysis, rates of margin-negative resection and survival after SM-PVR (n = 21) and without SM-PVR (n = 66) were compared in 87 patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head. In these patients undergoing SM-PVR (n = 21), survival rate was investigated in patients who did (n = 13) and did not (n = 8) undergo a margin-negative resection. RESULTS: In the first analysis, duration of surgery and volume of blood transfused perioperatively were higher in patients undergoing SM-PVR. However, mortality, morbidity rates, and mean hospital stay did not differ between patients who did undergo SM-PVR (31 patients, 3.2%, 48.4%, and 22.2 days, respectively) and who did not (119 patients, 2.5%, 47.1%, 25.9 days, respectively). No postoperative death occurred in the recent part of the present study, since 1994, in patients undergoing SM-PVR. In the second analysis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, rates of margin-negative resection and 2-year survival did not significantly differ between patients who did and did not undergo SM-PVR (62% and 22%, respectively, versus 73% and 24%). In patients undergoing SM-PVR, survival rate was significantly higher for patients undergoing a margin-negative resection (n = 13) than for patients undergoing a macroscopic or microscopic margin-positive resection (n = 8, 2-year survival = 57.1% versus 0%, P <0.05). CONCLUSION: PD combined with SM-PVR can be performed safely. This surgical procedure is followed by a promising survival rate and can be recommended in order to obtain a margin-negative resection; however, candidates for SM-PVR should be carefully selected.
BACKGROUND: Whether or not superior mesentericoportal venous resection (SM-PVR) associated with pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is safe and worthwhile has not been fully confirmed. The aim of the present study was to investigate results of this surgical procedure performed for pancreatic head and periampullary neoplasms. METHODS: As a first analysis, postoperative morbidity and mortality after PD with (n = 31) or without SM-PVR (n = 119) were investigated in 150 patients with pancreatic head and periampullary neoplasms. As a second analysis, rates of margin-negative resection and survival after SM-PVR (n = 21) and without SM-PVR (n = 66) were compared in 87 patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head. In these patients undergoing SM-PVR (n = 21), survival rate was investigated in patients who did (n = 13) and did not (n = 8) undergo a margin-negative resection. RESULTS: In the first analysis, duration of surgery and volume of blood transfused perioperatively were higher in patients undergoing SM-PVR. However, mortality, morbidity rates, and mean hospital stay did not differ between patients who did undergo SM-PVR (31 patients, 3.2%, 48.4%, and 22.2 days, respectively) and who did not (119 patients, 2.5%, 47.1%, 25.9 days, respectively). No postoperative death occurred in the recent part of the present study, since 1994, in patients undergoing SM-PVR. In the second analysis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, rates of margin-negative resection and 2-year survival did not significantly differ between patients who did and did not undergo SM-PVR (62% and 22%, respectively, versus 73% and 24%). In patients undergoing SM-PVR, survival rate was significantly higher for patients undergoing a margin-negative resection (n = 13) than for patients undergoing a macroscopic or microscopic margin-positive resection (n = 8, 2-year survival = 57.1% versus 0%, P <0.05). CONCLUSION: PD combined with SM-PVR can be performed safely. This surgical procedure is followed by a promising survival rate and can be recommended in order to obtain a margin-negative resection; however, candidates for SM-PVR should be carefully selected.
Authors: Jeannine Bachmann; Christoph W Michalski; Marc E Martignoni; Markus W Büchler; Helmut Friess Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2006 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Thomas Seufferlein; Marc Porzner; Volker Heinemann; Andrea Tannapfel; Martin Stuschke; Waldemar Uhl Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2014-05-30 Impact factor: 5.594