BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Flow diversion is a new strategy for the treatment of complex paraclinoid aneurysms. However, flow diverters have, to date, not been tested in direct comparison with other available treatments. We present a matched-pair comparison of paraclinoid aneurysms treated with the PED versus other endovascular techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-one eligible patients with 22 paraclinoid aneurysms treated with the PED at our institution were matched with historic controls with aneurysms of similar size and location. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of aneurysm size, location, risk factors, or comorbidities. Mean dome size was 13.9 ± 6.7 mm in the control group and 14.9 ± 6.3 mm in the PED group (P = .52). Balloon and stent assistance were used in 31.8% and 9.1% of controls, respectively, while carotid sacrifice was used in 36.4% of the controls. There was a significant difference in the rate of complete occlusion favoring PED at radiologic follow-up (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Flow diverters achieve a much higher rate of complete angiographic obliteration compared with other standard endovascular techniques in the treatment of internal carotid artery aneurysms. In this series, this higher angiographic obliteration rate did not occur at the expense of an increased rate of complications. Careful long-term follow-up is of the utmost importance to definitively validate flow diversion as a superior therapeutic strategy for proximal internal carotid artery aneurysms.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Flow diversion is a new strategy for the treatment of complex paraclinoid aneurysms. However, flow diverters have, to date, not been tested in direct comparison with other available treatments. We present a matched-pair comparison of paraclinoid aneurysms treated with the PED versus other endovascular techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-one eligible patients with 22 paraclinoid aneurysms treated with the PED at our institution were matched with historic controls with aneurysms of similar size and location. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of aneurysm size, location, risk factors, or comorbidities. Mean dome size was 13.9 ± 6.7 mm in the control group and 14.9 ± 6.3 mm in the PED group (P = .52). Balloon and stent assistance were used in 31.8% and 9.1% of controls, respectively, while carotid sacrifice was used in 36.4% of the controls. There was a significant difference in the rate of complete occlusion favoring PED at radiologic follow-up (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Flow diverters achieve a much higher rate of complete angiographic obliteration compared with other standard endovascular techniques in the treatment of internal carotid artery aneurysms. In this series, this higher angiographic obliteration rate did not occur at the expense of an increased rate of complications. Careful long-term follow-up is of the utmost importance to definitively validate flow diversion as a superior therapeutic strategy for proximal internal carotid artery aneurysms.
Authors: I Szikora; Z Berentei; Z Kulcsar; M Marosfoi; Z S Vajda; W Lee; A Berez; P K Nelson Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2010-02-11 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: D Fiorella; P Lylyk; I Szikora; M E Kelly; F C Albuquerque; C G McDougall; P K Nelson Journal: J Neurointerv Surg Date: 2009-06-16 Impact factor: 5.836
Authors: F Di Maria; S Pistocchi; F Clarençon; B Bartolini; R Blanc; A Biondi; H Redjem; J Chiras; N Sourour; M Piotin Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2015-08-13 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Robert J McDonald; Jennifer S McDonald; David F Kallmes; Giuseppe Lanzino; Harry J Cloft Journal: Interv Neuroradiol Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 1.610
Authors: A K Wakhloo; P Lylyk; J de Vries; C Taschner; J Lundquist; A Biondi; M Hartmann; I Szikora; L Pierot; N Sakai; H Imamura; N Sourour; I Rennie; M Skalej; O Beuing; A Bonafé; F Mery; F Turjman; P Brouwer; E Boccardi; L Valvassori; S Derakhshani; M W Litzenberg; M J Gounis Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2014-08-14 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Mario Zanaty; Nohra Chalouhi; Stavropoula I Tjoumakaris; Robert H Rosenwasser; Pascal M Jabbour Journal: Transl Stroke Res Date: 2013-11-24 Impact factor: 6.829
Authors: F Clarençon; F Di Maria; J Gabrieli; E Shotar; C Zeghal; A Nouet; J Chiras; N-A Sourour Journal: Clin Neuroradiol Date: 2015-08-07 Impact factor: 3.649