OBJECTIVES: Florbetapir F 18 PET can image amyloid-β (Aβ) aggregates in the brains of living subjects. We prospectively evaluated the prognostic utility of detecting Aβ pathology using florbetapir PET in subjects at risk for progressive cognitive decline. METHODS: A total of 151 subjects who previously participated in a multicenter florbetapir PET imaging study were recruited for longitudinal assessment. Subjects included 51 with recently diagnosed mild cognitive impairment (MCI), 69 cognitively normal controls (CN), and 31 with clinically diagnosed Alzheimer disease dementia (AD). PET images were visually scored as positive (Aβ+) or negative (Aβ-) for pathologic levels of β-amyloid aggregation, blind to diagnostic classification. Cerebral to cerebellar standardized uptake value ratios (SUVr) were determined from the baseline PET images. Subjects were followed for 18 months to evaluate changes in cognition and diagnostic status. Analysis of covariance and correlation analyses were conducted to evaluate the association between baseline PET amyloid status and subsequent cognitive decline. RESULTS: In both MCI and CN, baseline Aβ+ scans were associated with greater clinical worsening on the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog (p < 0.01) and Clinical Dementia Rating-sum of boxes (CDR-SB) (p < 0.02). In MCI Aβ+ scans were also associated with greater decline in memory, Digit Symbol Substitution (DSS), and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) (p < 0.05). In MCI, higher baseline SUVr similarly correlated with greater subsequent decline on the ADAS-Cog (p < 0.01), CDR-SB (p < 0.03), a memory measure, DSS, and MMSE (p < 0.05). Aβ+ MCI tended to convert to AD dementia at a higher rate than Aβ- subjects (p < 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: Florbetapir PET may help identify individuals at increased risk for progressive cognitive decline.
OBJECTIVES:Florbetapir F 18 PET can image amyloid-β (Aβ) aggregates in the brains of living subjects. We prospectively evaluated the prognostic utility of detecting Aβ pathology using florbetapir PET in subjects at risk for progressive cognitive decline. METHODS: A total of 151 subjects who previously participated in a multicenter florbetapir PET imaging study were recruited for longitudinal assessment. Subjects included 51 with recently diagnosed mild cognitive impairment (MCI), 69 cognitively normal controls (CN), and 31 with clinically diagnosed Alzheimer disease dementia (AD). PET images were visually scored as positive (Aβ+) or negative (Aβ-) for pathologic levels of β-amyloid aggregation, blind to diagnostic classification. Cerebral to cerebellar standardized uptake value ratios (SUVr) were determined from the baseline PET images. Subjects were followed for 18 months to evaluate changes in cognition and diagnostic status. Analysis of covariance and correlation analyses were conducted to evaluate the association between baseline PET amyloid status and subsequent cognitive decline. RESULTS: In both MCI and CN, baseline Aβ+ scans were associated with greater clinical worsening on the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog (p < 0.01) and Clinical Dementia Rating-sum of boxes (CDR-SB) (p < 0.02). In MCI Aβ+ scans were also associated with greater decline in memory, Digit Symbol Substitution (DSS), and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) (p < 0.05). In MCI, higher baseline SUVr similarly correlated with greater subsequent decline on the ADAS-Cog (p < 0.01), CDR-SB (p < 0.03), a memory measure, DSS, and MMSE (p < 0.05). Aβ+ MCI tended to convert to AD dementia at a higher rate than Aβ- subjects (p < 0.10). CONCLUSIONS:Florbetapir PET may help identify individuals at increased risk for progressive cognitive decline.
Authors: William J Jagust; Dan Bandy; Kewei Chen; Norman L Foster; Susan M Landau; Chester A Mathis; Julie C Price; Eric M Reiman; Daniel Skovronsky; Robert A Koeppe Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Victor L Villemagne; Kerryn E Pike; Gaël Chételat; Kathryn A Ellis; Rachel S Mulligan; Pierrick Bourgeat; Uwe Ackermann; Gareth Jones; Cassandra Szoeke; Olivier Salvado; Ralph Martins; Graeme O'Keefe; Chester A Mathis; William E Klunk; David Ames; Colin L Masters; Christopher C Rowe Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Juha O Rinne; David J Brooks; Martin N Rossor; Nick C Fox; Roger Bullock; William E Klunk; Chester A Mathis; Kaj Blennow; Jerome Barakos; Aren A Okello; Sofia Rodriguez Martinez de Liano; Enchi Liu; Martin Koller; Keith M Gregg; Dale Schenk; Ronald Black; Michael Grundman Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2010-02-26 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: J Koivunen; N Scheinin; J R Virta; S Aalto; T Vahlberg; K Någren; S Helin; R Parkkola; M Viitanen; J O Rinne Journal: Neurology Date: 2011-02-16 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: John C Morris; Catherine M Roe; Elizabeth A Grant; Denise Head; Martha Storandt; Alison M Goate; Anne M Fagan; David M Holtzman; Mark A Mintun Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2009-12
Authors: Clifford R Jack; David S Knopman; William J Jagust; Leslie M Shaw; Paul S Aisen; Michael W Weiner; Ronald C Petersen; John Q Trojanowski Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Seok Rye Choi; Geoff Golding; Zhiping Zhuang; Wei Zhang; Nathaniel Lim; Franz Hefti; Tyler E Benedum; Michael R Kilbourn; Daniel Skovronsky; Hank F Kung Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2009-10-16 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: David A Wolk; Julie C Price; Judy A Saxton; Beth E Snitz; Jeffrey A James; Oscar L Lopez; Howard J Aizenstein; Ann D Cohen; Lisa A Weissfeld; Chester A Mathis; William E Klunk; Steven T De-Kosky; Steven T DeKoskym Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Andrew J Aschenbrenner; David A Balota; Anne M Fagan; Janet M Duchek; Tammie L S Benzinger; John C Morris Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Gaël Chételat; Rik Ossenkoppele; Victor L Villemagne; Audrey Perrotin; Brigitte Landeau; Florence Mézenge; William J Jagust; Vincent Dore; Bruce L Miller; Stéphanie Egret; William W Seeley; Wiesje M van der Flier; Renaud La Joie; David Ames; Bart N M van Berckel; Philip Scheltens; Frederik Barkhof; Christopher C Rowe; Colin L Masters; Vincent de La Sayette; Femke Bouwman; Gil D Rabinovici Journal: Brain Date: 2016-06-29 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Bruce W Patterson; Donald L Elbert; Kwasi G Mawuenyega; Tom Kasten; Vitaliy Ovod; Shengmei Ma; Chengjie Xiong; Robert Chott; Kevin Yarasheski; Wendy Sigurdson; Lily Zhang; Alison Goate; Tammie Benzinger; John C Morris; David Holtzman; Randall J Bateman Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2015-07-20 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Murat Bilgel; Rebecca L Koscik; Yang An; Jerry L Prince; Susan M Resnick; Sterling C Johnson; Bruno M Jedynak Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2017 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Jonathan S Wall; Tina Richey; Sally Macy; Eric Heidel; Craig Wooliver; Stephen J Kennel Journal: Amyloid Date: 2013-01-17 Impact factor: 7.141
Authors: A P Nayate; J G Dubroff; J E Schmitt; I Nasrallah; R Kishore; D Mankoff; D A Pryma Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2015-03-12 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Cynthia M Stonnington; Kewei Chen; Wendy Lee; Dona E C Locke; Amylou C Dueck; Xiaofen Liu; Auttawut Roontiva; Adam S Fleisher; Richard J Caselli; Eric M Reiman Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2013-04-11 Impact factor: 21.566