OBJECTIVE: To determine whether preclinical Alzheimer disease (AD), as detected by the amyloid-imaging agent Pittsburgh Compound B (PiB) in cognitively normal older adults, is associated with risk of symptomatic AD. DESIGN: A longitudinal cohort study of cognitively normal older adults assessed with positron emission tomography (PET) to determine the mean cortical binding potential for PiB and followed up with annual clinical and cognitive assessments for progression to very mild dementia of the Alzheimer type (DAT). SETTING: The Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred fifty-nine participants with a mean age of 71.5 years with a Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) of 0 on a PET PiB scan at baseline. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Progression from CDR 0 to CDR 0.5 status (very mild dementia). RESULTS: Twenty-three participants progressed to CDR 0.5 at follow-up assessment (range, 1-5 assessments after PET PiB). Of these, 9 also were diagnosed with DAT. Higher mean cortical binding potential values for PiB (hazard ratio, 4.85; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-19.01; P = .02) and age (hazard ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.28; P = .03) predicted progression to CDR 0.5 DAT. The CDR 0.5 DAT group showed decline in 3 cognitive domains (episodic memory, semantic memory, and visuospatial performance) and had volume loss in the parahippocampal gyrus (includes entorhinal cortex) compared with individuals who remained at CDR 0. CONCLUSION: Preclinical AD as detected by PET PiB is not benign, as it is associated with progression to symptomatic AD.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether preclinical Alzheimer disease (AD), as detected by the amyloid-imaging agent Pittsburgh Compound B (PiB) in cognitively normal older adults, is associated with risk of symptomatic AD. DESIGN: A longitudinal cohort study of cognitively normal older adults assessed with positron emission tomography (PET) to determine the mean cortical binding potential for PiB and followed up with annual clinical and cognitive assessments for progression to very mild dementia of the Alzheimer type (DAT). SETTING: The Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred fifty-nine participants with a mean age of 71.5 years with a Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) of 0 on a PET PiB scan at baseline. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Progression from CDR 0 to CDR 0.5 status (very mild dementia). RESULTS: Twenty-three participants progressed to CDR 0.5 at follow-up assessment (range, 1-5 assessments after PET PiB). Of these, 9 also were diagnosed with DAT. Higher mean cortical binding potential values for PiB (hazard ratio, 4.85; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-19.01; P = .02) and age (hazard ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.28; P = .03) predicted progression to CDR 0.5 DAT. The CDR 0.5 DAT group showed decline in 3 cognitive domains (episodic memory, semantic memory, and visuospatial performance) and had volume loss in the parahippocampal gyrus (includes entorhinal cortex) compared with individuals who remained at CDR 0. CONCLUSION: Preclinical AD as detected by PET PiB is not benign, as it is associated with progression to symptomatic AD.
Authors: M A Mintun; G N Larossa; Y I Sheline; C S Dence; S Y Lee; R H Mach; W E Klunk; C A Mathis; S T DeKosky; J C Morris Journal: Neurology Date: 2006-08-08 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Anne M Fagan; Denise Head; Aarti R Shah; Daniel Marcus; Mark Mintun; John C Morris; David M Holtzman Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: T R Stoub; M Bulgakova; S Leurgans; D A Bennett; D Fleischman; D A Turner; L deToledo-Morrell Journal: Neurology Date: 2005-05-10 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Trey Sunderland; Gary Linker; Nadeem Mirza; Karen T Putnam; David L Friedman; Lida H Kimmel; Judy Bergeson; Guy J Manetti; Matthew Zimmermann; Brian Tang; John J Bartko; Robert M Cohen Journal: JAMA Date: 2003 Apr 23-30 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: I Skoog; P Davidsson; O Aevarsson; H Vanderstichele; E Vanmechelen; K Blennow Journal: Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord Date: 2003 Impact factor: 2.959
Authors: Leslie M Shaw; Hugo Vanderstichele; Malgorzata Knapik-Czajka; Christopher M Clark; Paul S Aisen; Ronald C Petersen; Kaj Blennow; Holly Soares; Adam Simon; Piotr Lewczuk; Robert Dean; Eric Siemers; William Potter; Virginia M-Y Lee; John Q Trojanowski Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Kerryn E Pike; Greg Savage; Victor L Villemagne; Steven Ng; Simon A Moss; Paul Maruff; Chester A Mathis; William E Klunk; Colin L Masters; Christopher C Rowe Journal: Brain Date: 2007-10-10 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Chester A Mathis; Yanming Wang; Daniel P Holt; Guo-Feng Huang; Manik L Debnath; William E Klunk Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2003-06-19 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Howard Jay Aizenstein; Robert D Nebes; Judith A Saxton; Julie C Price; Chester A Mathis; Nicholas D Tsopelas; Scott K Ziolko; Jeffrey A James; Beth E Snitz; Patricia R Houck; Wenzhu Bi; Ann D Cohen; Brian J Lopresti; Steven T DeKosky; Edythe M Halligan; William E Klunk Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2008-11
Authors: Andrei G Vlassenko; Mark A Mintun; Chengjie Xiong; Yvette I Sheline; Alison M Goate; Tammie L S Benzinger; John C Morris Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Liana G Apostolova; Kristy S Hwang; John P Andrawis; Amity E Green; Sona Babakchanian; Jonathan H Morra; Jeffrey L Cummings; Arthur W Toga; John Q Trojanowski; Leslie M Shaw; Clifford R Jack; Ronald C Petersen; Paul S Aisen; William J Jagust; Robert A Koeppe; Chester A Mathis; Michael W Weiner; Paul M Thompson Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2010-06-11 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Reisa A Sperling; Paul S Aisen; Laurel A Beckett; David A Bennett; Suzanne Craft; Anne M Fagan; Takeshi Iwatsubo; Clifford R Jack; Jeffrey Kaye; Thomas J Montine; Denise C Park; Eric M Reiman; Christopher C Rowe; Eric Siemers; Yaakov Stern; Kristine Yaffe; Maria C Carrillo; Bill Thies; Marcelle Morrison-Bogorad; Molly V Wagster; Creighton H Phelps Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2011-04-21 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Michelle M Mielke; Ozioma C Okonkwo; Kenichi Oishi; Susumu Mori; Sarah Tighe; Michael I Miller; Can Ceritoglu; Timothy Brown; Marilyn Albert; Constantine G Lyketsos Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2012 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Natalie L Marchant; Bruce R Reed; Charles S DeCarli; Cindee M Madison; Michael W Weiner; Helena C Chui; William J Jagust Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2011-11-01 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Lisa Mosconi; John Murray; Wai H Tsui; Yi Li; Nicole Spector; Alexander Goldowsky; Schantel Williams; Ricardo Osorio; Pauline McHugh; Lidia Glodzik; Shankar Vallabhajosula; Mony J de Leon Journal: Neurology Date: 2014-02-12 Impact factor: 9.910