Literature DB >> 12711947

An outcome analysis comparing the thoracodorsal and internal mammary vessels as recipient sites for microvascular breast reconstruction: a prospective study of 100 patients.

Steven L Moran1, Guillermina Nava, Amir B Behnam, Joseph M Serletti, Amir H Behnam.   

Abstract

The thoracodorsal vessels have been the standard recipient vessels for the majority of surgeons performing free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap reconstructions. Recently, the internal mammary vessels have been recommended as the first-choice recipient vessels for microvascular breast reconstruction. This approach requires a shorter pedicle length, allows for central placement of flap tissue, and avoids axillary scarring. The use of the internal mammary vessels may provide for a shorter operative time and a higher-quality aesthetic reconstruction. The authors performed a prospective trial examining the differences in operative and aesthetic outcomes between each recipient site. A prospective trial of 108 consecutive free-tissue transfers was conducted in 100 patients. The first 60 TRAM flap patients were randomized so that 30 flaps were anastomosed to the internal mammary vessels and 30 were anastomosed to the thoracodorsal vessels, whereas the recipient vessels for the remaining 40 patients were left to the discretion of the surgeon. Of the 40 nonrandomized patients, 10 patients underwent reconstruction using the internal mammary vessels and 30 patients underwent reconstruction using the thoracodorsal vessels. The patients' medical history and hospital course were noted. To evaluate aesthetic outcome, a group of five blinded nonmedical observers and three blinded plastic surgeons graded the reconstructions in the 60 TRAM flap patients for symmetry and overall aesthetic result on a scale of 1 to 5. Blinded practitioners administered postoperative questionnaires to patients regarding recovery time and satisfaction with the aesthetic result. Forty-three flaps were transferred to the internal mammary vessels and 65 were transferred to the thoracodorsal vessels. No significant differences existed between groups with regard to age of preoperative risk factors. Average operative time was 6 hours in each group. Average hospital stay was 5.8 days in each group. Conversion from initial recipient vessel to a secondary recipient site occurred in 12.5 percent of internal mammary reconstructions and 7 percent of thoracodorsal reconstructions. All converted internal mammary cases occurred in left-sided reconstructions and were attributable to problems with the veins. Overall, 20 percent of left-sided internal mammary reconstructions were found to have an inadequate recipient vein. Unusable thoracodorsal vessels were found only in delayed reconstructions, at a rate of 15 percent in the delayed setting. All flaps from converted procedures survived without complications. Average follow-up was 20 months, during which time there was one flap loss in the thoracodorsal group. There were no significant differences in complication rates between groups. Average aesthetic grade was 3.6 in each group. Postoperative recovery time and overall patient satisfaction were not significantly different between groups. Either recipient site can provide for a safe and acceptable result; however, surgeons should be aware of conversion rates and plan appropriately if recipient vessels appear unusable for free-tissue transfer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12711947     DOI: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000056872.06003.7E

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  26 in total

1.  Can internal thoracic arteries be used for both coronary artery bypass and breast reconstruction?

Authors:  Maria E Currie; Stephanie A Fox; Rebecca J Greer-Bayramoglu; Amanda J Fortin; Michael W A Chu
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-08-16

2.  The originating pattern of deep inferior epigastric artery: anatomical study and surgical considerations.

Authors:  Yujin Myung; Bomi Choi; Sang Jun Yim; Bo La Yun; Heeyeon Kwon; Chang Sik Pak; Chanyeong Heo; Jae Hoon Jeong
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  eComment. The risk of loss of the breast flap after coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Jamil Hajj-Chahine; Hassan Houmaida; Jerome Danion; Jacques Tomasi
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-11

Review 4.  The anatomy and variations of the internal thoracic (internal mammary) artery and implications in autologous breast reconstruction: clinical anatomical study and literature review.

Authors:  Alice C A Murray; Warren M Rozen; Alberto Alonso-Burgos; Mark W Ashton; Emilio Garcia-Tutor; Iain S Whitaker
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 5.  Achieving autologous breast reconstruction for breast cancer patients in the setting of post-mastectomy radiotherapy.

Authors:  Namrata S Anavekar; Warren M Rozen; Cara M Le Roux; Mark W Ashton
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 4.442

6.  Recipient vessel selection in immediate breast reconstruction with free abdominal tissue transfer after nipple-sparing mastectomy.

Authors:  Sung Jun Yang; Jin Sup Eom; Taik Jong Lee; Sei Hyun Ahn; Byung Ho Son
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2012-05-10

7.  "Mini-Flow-Through" Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap for Breast Reconstruction with Preservation of Both Internal Mammary and Deep Inferior Epigastric Vessels.

Authors:  Toshihiko Satake; Jun Sugawara; Kazunori Yasumura; Taro Mikami; Shinji Kobayashi; Jiro Maegawa
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2015-11-16

8.  The cardiac implications of breast reconstruction using the internal mammary artery as the recipient vessel.

Authors:  Amanda J Fortin; H Brian Evans; Michael Wa Chu
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2012

9.  Internal mammary usability as recipient vessels in DIEP breast reconstruction in the setting of previous radiation.

Authors:  William Leppard; Thomas Pomposelli; Eric I Chang; Ahmed Suliman; Fernando Herrera
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 2.740

10.  Applications of rib sparing technique in internal mammary vessels exposure of abdominal free flap breast reconstructions: a 12-year single-center experience of 215 cases.

Authors:  Qi Zhang; Qin Xiao; Rong Guo; Bingqiu Xiu; Lun Li; Weiru Chi; Yajia Gu; Jiong Wu
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.