T J Cole1. 1. MRC Centre of Epidemiology for Child Health, UCL Institute of Child Health, London, UK. tim.cole@ucl.ac.uk
Abstract
CONTEXT: De Montbeillard produced the first growth chart in the late 18(th) century. Since then, growth assessment has developed to become an essential component of child health practice. OBJECTIVE: To provide a brief history of (i) anthropometry, i.e. growth measurements; (ii) growth references, the statistical summary of anthropometry and (iii) growth charts, the visual representation of growth references for clinical use. METHODS: The major contributors in the three categories over the past 200 years were identified and their historical contributions put in context with more recent developments. RESULTS: Anthropometry was originally collected for administrative or public health purposes, its medical role emerging at the end of the 19(th) century. Growth reference data were collected in earnest from the 19(th) century, during which time the familiar statistical summary statistics-mean, SD, centiles-were developed. More advanced statistical methods emerged much later. Growth charts first appeared in the late 19(th) century and Tanner and Whitehouse later popularized the concepts of velocity and conditional references for growth in puberty. An important recent reference is the WHO growth standard, which documents optimal growth and has been adopted by many countries including the UK. Arising from it, the UK-WHO charts have pioneered many design features to improve usability and accuracy. CONCLUSION: Growth charts have developed considerably in 200 years and they represent an impressive synthesis of anthropometry, statistical summary and chart design.
CONTEXT: De Montbeillard produced the first growth chart in the late 18(th) century. Since then, growth assessment has developed to become an essential component of child health practice. OBJECTIVE: To provide a brief history of (i) anthropometry, i.e. growth measurements; (ii) growth references, the statistical summary of anthropometry and (iii) growth charts, the visual representation of growth references for clinical use. METHODS: The major contributors in the three categories over the past 200 years were identified and their historical contributions put in context with more recent developments. RESULTS: Anthropometry was originally collected for administrative or public health purposes, its medical role emerging at the end of the 19(th) century. Growth reference data were collected in earnest from the 19(th) century, during which time the familiar statistical summary statistics-mean, SD, centiles-were developed. More advanced statistical methods emerged much later. Growth charts first appeared in the late 19(th) century and Tanner and Whitehouse later popularized the concepts of velocity and conditional references for growth in puberty. An important recent reference is the WHO growth standard, which documents optimal growth and has been adopted by many countries including the UK. Arising from it, the UK-WHO charts have pioneered many design features to improve usability and accuracy. CONCLUSION: Growth charts have developed considerably in 200 years and they represent an impressive synthesis of anthropometry, statistical summary and chart design.
Authors: Maria Jalbrzikowski; David Freedman; Catherine E Hegarty; Eva Mennigen; Katherine H Karlsgodt; Loes M Olde Loohuis; Roel A Ophoff; Raquel E Gur; Carrie E Bearden Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2019-01-18 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: David S Freedman; Hannah G Lawman; Liping Pan; Asheley C Skinner; David B Allison; Lisa C McGuire; Heidi M Blanck Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2016-03-17 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Amy K Connery; Gretchen Berrios-Siervo; Paola Arroyave; Desiree Bauer; Sara Hernandez; Alejandra Paniagua-Avila; Guillermo Antonio Bolaños; Saskia Bunge-Montes; Hana M El Sahly; Mirella Calvimontes; Daniel Olson; Flor M Munoz; Edwin J Asturias Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: William Johnson; Tom Norris; Rebekah De Freitas; Natalie Pearson; Mark Hamer; Silvia Costa Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2020-08-21 Impact factor: 5.095