Literature DB >> 30805630

Appropriate Use of Linear Growth Measures to Assess Impact of Interventions on Child Development and Catch-Up Growth.

Edward A Frongillo1, Jef L Leroy2, Karin Lapping3.   

Abstract

Linear growth is increasingly used as the sole or primary outcome for evaluating interventions, but impact is often not seen. Sometimes there is interest in whether children catch up to where they otherwise would have been had detrimental conditions not occurred, but the literature is confusing because of claims for evidence of catch-up growth based on inappropriate methods. This article examines the use of linear growth measures to evaluate intervention impact and catch-up. Focus on linear growth as a measure of impact has resulted in a lack of demonstrable intervention effects, evaluations that do not use measures responsive to nutrition-sensitive and integrated interventions, insufficient emphasis on adolescent girls and women before conception and children after the first 1000 d, and insufficient investment in developing other measures. Nutrition interventions may benefit children but may not discernibly affect linear growth deficits in immediate or intermediate periods. Interventions intended to affect one domain may have positive or negative impacts on others. Child nutrition and growth are part of early childhood development; the focus should be on improving conditions in which children grow and develop throughout childhood and adolescence because poor conditions in a population affect all children. To assess the impact of nutrition interventions, it is important to use a broad set of measures and indicators of outcomes and immediate and underlying determinants. The 4 criteria for demonstrating catch-up in growth, which are much more stringent than those for demonstrating intervention impact, require demonstration of the following: 1) an inhibiting condition and 2) reduced velocity during 1 period, 3) followed by alleviation of or compensation for the inhibiting condition, and 4) higher-than-normal velocity during a subsequent period. Partial catch-up growth is sometimes possible when constraints are removed, but whether it is beneficial to the child is not clear. Research is needed to develop, refine, and validate measures and indicators for the purposes intended.
Copyright © American Society for Nutrition 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  catch-up growth; child development; children; height; length; linear growth; measures; stunting

Year:  2019        PMID: 30805630      PMCID: PMC6520037          DOI: 10.1093/advances/nmy093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Nutr        ISSN: 2161-8313            Impact factor:   8.701


  45 in total

1.  Effects of prenatal micronutrient and early food supplementation on maternal hemoglobin, birth weight, and infant mortality among children in Bangladesh: the MINIMat randomized trial.

Authors:  Lars Åke Persson; Shams Arifeen; Eva-Charlotte Ekström; Kathleen M Rasmussen; Edward A Frongillo; Md Yunus
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Catch-up growth following illness or starvation. An example of developmental canalization in man.

Authors:  A PRADER; J M TANNER; G von HARNACK
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1963-05       Impact factor: 4.406

3.  Participating in a Food-Assisted Maternal and Child Nutrition and Health Program in Rural Guatemala Alters Household Dietary Choices.

Authors:  Melissa L Jensen; Edward A Frongillo; Jef L Leroy; Christine E Blake
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 4.798

4.  Food Insecurity Mediates the Effect of a Poverty-Alleviation Program on Psychosocial Health among the Ultra-Poor in Bangladesh.

Authors:  Chowdhury S B Jalal; Edward A Frongillo; Andrea M Warren
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 4.798

5.  Height and weight standards for preschool children. How relevant are ethnic differences in growth potential?

Authors:  J P Habicht; R Martorell; C Yarbrough; R M Malina; R E Klein
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1974-04-06       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Evaluation of programs to improve complementary feeding in infants and young children.

Authors:  Edward A Frongillo
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  Children who recover from early stunting and children who are not stunted demonstrate similar levels of cognition.

Authors:  Benjamin T Crookston; Mary E Penny; Stephen C Alder; Ty T Dickerson; Ray M Merrill; Joseph B Stanford; Christina A Porucznik; Kirk A Dearden
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 4.798

8.  The development of growth references and growth charts.

Authors:  T J Cole
Journal:  Ann Hum Biol       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 1.533

Review 9.  Use and Misuse of Stunting as a Measure of Child Health.

Authors:  Nandita Perumal; Diego G Bassani; Daniel E Roth
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.798

10.  Effects of prenatal food and micronutrient supplementation on child growth from birth to 54 months of age: a randomized trial in Bangladesh.

Authors:  Ashraful Islam Khan; Iqbal Kabir; Eva-Charlotte Ekström; Kajsa Åsling-Monemi; Dewan Shamsul Alam; Edward A Frongillo; Md Yunus; Shams Arifeen; Lars-Åke Persson
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 3.271

View more
  8 in total

1.  Can Children Catch up from the Consequences of Undernourishment? Evidence from Child Linear Growth, Developmental Epigenetics, and Brain and Neurocognitive Development.

Authors:  Jef L Leroy; Edward A Frongillo; Pragya Dewan; Maureen M Black; Robert A Waterland
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 8.701

2.  Monthly measurement of child lengths between 6 and 27 months of age in Burkina Faso reveals both chronic and episodic growth faltering.

Authors:  Ilana R Cliffer; William A Masters; Nandita Perumal; Elena N Naumova; Augustin N Zeba; Franck Garanet; Beatrice L Rogers
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 3.  What is normal, healthy growth? Global health, human biology, and parental perspectives.

Authors:  Amanda L Thompson
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 2.947

4.  Exploring the Nutritional Ecology of Stunting: New Approaches to an Old Problem.

Authors:  Daniel J Raiten; Andrew A Bremer
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 5.717

5.  Using height-adjusted stunting prevalence will fail disadvantaged children worldwide.

Authors:  Jef L Leroy; Edward A Frongillo; Elaine Borghi
Journal:  Lancet Glob Health       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 38.927

6.  A Fortified Food Can Be Replaced by Micronutrient Supplements for Distribution in a Mexican Social Protection Program Based on Results of a Cluster-Randomized Trial and Costing Analysis.

Authors:  Lynnette M Neufeld; Armando García-Guerra; Amado D Quezada; Florence Théodore; Anabelle Bonvecchio Arenas; Clara Domínguez Islas; Raquel Garcia-Feregrino; Amira Hernandez; Arantxa Colchero; Jean Pierre Habicht
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 4.798

7.  Nutrition status and morbidity of Ethiopian children after recovery from severe acute malnutrition: Prospective matched cohort study.

Authors:  Tsinuel Girma; Philip T James; Alemseged Abdissa; Hanqi Luo; Yesufe Getu; Yilak Fantaye; Kate Sadler; Paluku Bahwere
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  WHO Child Growth Standards in context: The Baby-bod Project - Observational study in Tasmania.

Authors:  Sisitha Jayasinghe; Manoja P Herath; Jeffrey M Beckett; Kiran D K Ahuja; Nuala M Byrne; Andrew P Hills
Journal:  BMJ Paediatr Open       Date:  2021-06-16
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.