| Literature DB >> 22779023 |
Chodchanok Vijarnsorn1, Kritvikrom Durongpisitkul, Prakul Chanthong, Paweena Chungsomprasong, Jarupim Soongswang, Duangmanee Loahaprasitiporn, Apichart Nana.
Abstract
Objectives. To compare the failure ratio and inhospital complications across three age groups of patients and to investigate the effects of balloon sizing on the success and the device diameter. Methods. This retrospective review was of 665 patients who had been listed for transcatheter-based closure of ASD between 1999 and 2010. The patients were divided into three age groups: children (<18 years; n = 183), adults (18-50 years; n = 337), and older adults (>50 years; n = 145). Procedural outcomes and early complications were reviewed. Use of balloon sizing was explored for its benefits. Results. Overall, failure of closure was 6.6% (n = 44). Use of balloon sizing tended to lead to a smaller device/defect ratio that was comparable to procedures without balloon sizing, though it did not predict the success rate (OR 1.4, 95% CI 0.7-2.3). Seven patients reported device embolization (1%). No mortalities were noted. In-hospital complications were 3.4%, with common complications, being vascular complications (1.4%) and cardiac arrhythmia (1.1%). No differences in failure rate or events were found among the three groups. Conclusion. Transcather closure of ASD is feasible and safe, regardless of the patient's age. A low rate of early complications was noted. Balloon sizing does not aggravate an oversizing of the device, but does not predict success.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22779023 PMCID: PMC3388325 DOI: 10.1155/2012/584236
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiol Res Pract ISSN: 2090-0597 Impact factor: 1.866
Patients' baseline characteristics (n = 665).
| Overall ( | Children and adolescents (<18 years) ( | Young and middle-aged adults (18–50 years) ( | Older adults (>50 years) ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age at presentation (years) | 32.7 | 8.1 | 34.6 | 59.1 |
| Waiting period prior to procedure (months) | 3.14 | 3.6 | 3.1 | 2.6 |
| Age at time of procedure (years) | 33.5 | 8.8 | 35.5 | 59.8 |
| Weight (kg) | 47.9 | 28.3 | 54.9 | 56.2 |
| Height (cm) | 148.9 | 125.3 | 159.1 | 156.1 |
| ASD diameter by TEE (mm) | 22.1 ± 7.3 | 17.8 ± 0.7 | 23.9 ± 6.5 | 23.4 ± 6.4 |
| Device size (mm) | 26.2 ± 7.5 | 20.8 ± 7.9 | 28.2 ± 6.2 | 28.2 ± 6.6 |
| Intraprocedural method for confirming the size of defect | ||||
| Exclusive TEE | 159 | 52 | 68 | 35 |
| Exclusive ICE | 39 | 8 | 25 | 6 |
| Balloon sizing and TEE | 454 | 122 | 235 | 97 |
| Balloon sizing and ICE | 13 | 1 | 9 | 3 |
| Pulmonary artery systolic pressure (mmHg) | 38.6 | 34.5 | 40.7 | 43.8 |
| Mean pulmonary artery pressure (mmHg) | 21.2 | 18.6 | 21.9 | 23.4 |
| Qp : Qs | 3.4 | 2.7 | 3.7 | 3.5 |
| Procedural time (min) | 56.7 | 61.7 | 54.4 | 56.3 |
| Fluoroscopy time (min) | 12.7 | 14.2 | 11.7 | 13.1 |
| Hospital LOS (days) | 1.56 | 2.4 | 1.3 | 1.2 |
Values are expressed as mean ± SD, median (range) and n (% within group).
Figure 1Annual number of cases of transcatheter closure of ASD and failure ratios, Siriraj Hospital (n = 665).
Success and failure of transcatheter closure of ASD at the end of procedure (n = 665).
| Overall ( | Children and adolescents (<18 years) ( | Young and middle-aged adults (18–50 years) ( | Adults (>50 years) ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Device successfully implanted at the end of procedure | 621 | 169 | 315 | 137 | NS |
| Unfeasible defects (by TEE), attempt to use ASD device abandoned | 18 | 3 | 11 | 4 | NS |
| Failure of device placement | 26 | 11 | 11 | 4 | NS |
| Device embolization immediately postdeployment | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 |
Values are expressed as n (% within group).
∗Statistical significance at P value <0.05.
Figure 2Device/diameter ratio for ASD in successful procedures among the age groups (n = 621), age group 1 = children and adolescents (<18 years of age; n = 169), age group 2 = young to middle-aged adults (18–50 years of age; n = 315), and group age 3 = older adults (>50 years; n = 137).
Figure 3Failure ratios for patients who did, or did not, undergo balloon sizing (n = 665). P value = 0.29, 95% CI of odd ratio = 0.7–3.5.
Overall comparison of ASD diameter, device size, device/diameter of defect ratio, procedural time, and fluoroscopy time in successful cases of patients who had, or had not, used balloon sizing (n = 621).
| TEE or ICE only ( | Balloon sizing with TEE or ICE ( |
| 95% CI of the difference | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASD diameter (mm) | 20.5 ± 7.9 | 22.8 ± 6.9 | <0.001∗ | 1.1–3.5 |
| Device size (mm) | 25.2 ± 8.0 | 26.7 ± 7.3 | 0.03∗ | 0.15–2.7 |
| Device/ASD diameter ratio | 1.31 ± 0.31 | 1.22 ± 0.33 | <0.001∗ | 0.03–0.14 |
| Procedural time (min) | 54.7 ± 16.6 | 57.2 ± 23.6 | 0.14 | −6.6–1.2 |
| Fluoroscopy time (min) | 10.4 ± 5.7 | 13.8 ± 8.9 | <0.001 | 2–4.7 |
Values are expressed as mean ± SD.
Statistical significance at P value <0.05.
Figure 4Failure ratio of transcatheter closure of ASD with TEE, ICE, and balloon sizing with TEE and balloon sizing with ICE (n = 665). P value = 0.52.
Comparison of ASD diameters, device sizes, device/diameter ratio, and procedural times in successful cases of patients who had TEE only or TEE with balloon sizing.
| TEE only ( | TEE with balloon sizing ( |
| 95% CI of the difference | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASD diameter (mm) | 20.1 ± 8.2 | 22.9 ± 6.9 | <0.001∗ | −4.0–−1.4 |
| Device size (mm) | 24.7 ± 8.4 | 26.7 ± 6.3 | 0.004∗ | −3.41–−0.66 |
| Device/ASD diameter ratio | 1.31 ± 0.32 | 1.22 ± 0.34 | 0.005∗ | 0.02–0.15 |
| Procedural time (min) | 55.8 ± 15.7 | 57.8 ± 23.7 | 0.3 | −5.9–1.9 |
| Fluoroscopy time (min) | 10.2 ± 6.1 | 13.9 ± 9.0 | <0.001∗ | −5.2–−2.2 |
Values are expressed by mean ± SD.
∗Statistical significance at P value <0.05.
Comparison of ASD diameters, device sizes, device ratios, and procedural times in successful cases of patients who had ICE only or ICE with balloon sizing.
| ICE only ( | ICE with balloon sizing ( |
| 95% CI of the difference | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASD diameter (mm) | 21.6 ± 7.02 | 19.4 ± 5.8 | 0.33 | −2.1–6.5 |
| Device size (mm) | 27.6 ± 6.0 | 24.9 ± 6.0 | 0.12 | −1.3–6.8 |
| Device : ASD diameter ratio | 1.32 ± 0.23 | 1.21 ± 0.12 | 0.23 | −0.07–0.29 |
| Procedural time (min) | 49.9 ± 21.3 | 53.8 ± 20.6 | 0.56 | −17.5–9.7 |
| Fluoroscopy time (min) | 11.4 ± 4.0 | 10.5 ± 3.8 | 0.50 | −1.7–3.4 |
Values are expressed as mean ± SD.
∗Statistical significance at P value <0.05.
In-hospital complications following transcatheter closure of ASD (n = 621).
| Overall ( | Children and adolescents (<18 years) ( | Young and middle-aged adults (18–50-years) ( | Older adults (>50-years) ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cardiac arrest | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NS |
| Device embolization | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | NS |
| Cardiac tamponade | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | NS |
| Tachyarrhythmia ventricular rate > 160/min | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | NS |
| Bradyarrhythmia ventricular rate < 60/min | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | NS |
| Hypotension | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NS |
| Bleeding and requiring blood transfusion | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | NS |
| Vascular complication | 9 | 4 | 3 | 2 | NS |
| (i) Femoral arteriovenous fistula | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | |
| (ii) Femoral hematoma | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |
| (iii) Femoral thrombosis (resolved by heparin infusion) | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| Cerebrovascular accident | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | NS |
| Renal failure | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NS |
| Nickel allergic reaction | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NS |
| Residual shunt by TTE postprocedure 24 hours | 33 | 10 | 14 | 10 | NS |
Values are expressed as median (range) and n (% within group)
∗Statistical significance at P value <0.05.