| Literature DB >> 22778782 |
Yi-Chun Weng1, Sung-Ting Chuang, Yen-Chu Lin, Cheng-Fung Chuang, Tzong-Cherng Chi, Hsi-Lin Chiu, Yueh-Hsiung Kuo, Ming-Jai Su.
Abstract
Caffeic acid phenyl ester is distributed wildly in nature and has antidiabetic and cardiovascular protective effects. However, rapid decomposition by esterase leads to its low bioavailability in vivo. In this study, chronic metabolic and cardiovascular effects of oral caffeic acid phenylethyl amide, whose structure is similar to caffeic acid phenyl ester and resveratrol, were investigated in ICR mice. We found that caffeic acid phenylethyl amide protected against diet or streptozocin-induced metabolic changes increased coronary flow and decreased infarct size after global ischemia-reperfusion in Langendorff perfused heart. Further study indicated that at least two pathways might be involved in such beneficial effects: the induction of the antioxidant protein MnSOD and the decrease of the proinflammatory cytokine TNFα and NFκB in the liver. However, the detailed mechanisms of caffeic acid phenylethyl amide need further studies. In summary, this study demonstrated the protective potential of chronic treatment of caffeic acid phenylethyl amide against the metabolic consequences in diabetes mellitus.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22778782 PMCID: PMC3388606 DOI: 10.1155/2012/984780
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1The chemical structures of CAPE and CAPA used in the present study. CAPA was obtained from the amide binding coupling method, beginning with caffeic acid.
Figure 2Fat metabolism of mice. (a) Body weight before (0W) and after two (2W) and four (4W) weeks of diet exposure. (b and c) Fat mass and fat to body weight ratio after 4 weeks of diet exposure. (d and e) Plasma levels of retinol binding protein 4 (RBP4) and adiponectin after 4 weeks of diet exposure. n = 6–8 per group; means ± SEM; Con: control mice; HF: mice fed with high fat and diet; HFCA: HF mice treated with CAPA; HFMET: HF mice treated with metformin; *: P < 0.05 versus Con; #: P < 0.05 versus HF.
Food and water intake of mice after 4 weeks of diet exposure.
| Basal | After 4 weeks of diet exposure | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Con | HF | HC | HM | ||
| Body weight (g) | 25.6 ± 0.4 | 35.5 ± 0.8 | 40.2 ± 1.0∗ | 37.2 ± 0.6# | 35.0 ± 1.1# |
| Night food intake (g) | 4.5 ± 0.5 | 6.0 ± 0.5 | 4.3 ± 0.8∗ | 2.4 ± 0.3# | 2.4 ± 0.4# |
| Night water intake (mL) | 10.5 ± 0.6 | 12.2 ± 0.2 | 6.4 ± 0.6∗ | 5.9 ± 0.3 | 6.4 ± 0.5 |
| Night calorie intake | |||||
| Food (kcal) | 14.4 ± 1.3 | 18.1 ± 1.4 | 19.8 ± 2.2 | 12.5 ± 0.9# | 11.1 ± 1.7# |
| Water (kcal) | — | — | 5.5 ± 0.3 | 4.1 ± 0.5 | 5.1 ± 0.4 |
| Total (kcal) | 14.4 ± 1.3 | 18.1 ± 1.4 | 25.3 ± 2.2∗ | 16.6 ± 0.8# | 15.9 ± 4.4# |
Con: control mice; HF: mice fed with high fat and diet; HC: HF mice treated with CAPA; HM: HF mice treated with metformin; ∗: P < 0.05 versus Con; #: P < 0.05 versus HF; n = 6–8 per group.
Figure 3Diet-induced hyperglycemia and hyperlipidemia were reduced by CAPA treatment in BLTW : CD1(ICR) mice. (a) Plasma glucose levels after 4 weeks of diet exposure. (b) Plasma insulin levels after 4 weeks of diet exposure. (c) Plasma triglycerides levels after 4 weeks of diet exposure. (d) Plasma total cholesterol levels after 4 weeks of diet exposure. n = 6–8 per group; means ± SEM; Con: control mice; HF: mice fed with high fat and diet; HFCA: HF mice treated with CAPA; HFMET: HF mice treated with metformin; *: P < 0.05 versus Con; #: P < 0.05 versus HF.
Figure 4BLTW : CD1(ICR) mice are protected from diet-induced glucose intolerance. (a) Glucose tolerance test (GTT) after 4 weeks of diet exposure by using an i.p. dose of 2 g of glucose per kg of body weight. (b) Values of the area under the curve (AUC) during GTT since the different basal plasma glucose levels, areas between glucose curves after glucose or insulin injection, and baseline glucose level curve (ΔAUC) were calculated. (c) Insulin tolerance test (ITT) after 4 weeks of diet exposure by using 0.5 IU/kg insulin. (d) ΔAUC during ITT. n = 6–8 per group; means ± SEM; *: P < 0.05 versus Con; #: P < 0.05 versus HF. (e) Glycogen content assay after 4 weeks of diet exposure by using 0.5 IU/kg insulin. n = 6–8 per group; means ± SEM; *: P < 0.05 versus those treated with vehicle (V, grey bars); #: P < 0.05 versus HF treated with insulin (I, black bars); Con: control mice; HF: mice fed with high fat and diet; HFCA or HC: HF mice treated with CAPA; HFMET or HM: HF mice treated with metformin.
Metabolism and ischemic injury of mice after 4 weeks of diet exposure.
| After 4 weeks of diet exposure | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Con | HF | HF2WCA2W | HF2WMET2W | |
| Body weight (g) | 35.5 ± | 40.2 ± 1.0∗ | 39.7 ± 1.2∗ | 38.3 ± 0.7∗ |
| Plasma insulin (pM) | 117.5 | 203.5 | 148.3 ± 29.2# | 131.1 ± 20.5# |
| Plasma glucose during IPGTT (mg/dL) | ||||
| 0 min after injection | 109.2 ± 7.5 | 169.9 ± 4.5∗ | 149 ± 6.9∗,# | 151.4 ± 8.5∗, # |
| 30 min after injection | 290.8 ± 31.5 | 359.0 ± 17.5∗ | 291.7 ± 2.4∗, # | 271.8 ± 2.3∗, # |
| 120 min after injection | 172.2 ± 26.3 | 297.5 ± 20.5∗ | 166.7 ± 10.2∗, # | 179.3 ± 5.2∗, # |
| Basal coronary flow (mL/min) | 3.4 ± 0.5 | 1.6 ± 0.3∗ | 3.6 ± 0.4# | 2.5 ± 0.4# |
| Infarct size of the heart after global ischemia/reperfusion (AAR%) | 30.6 ± 5.1 | 39.4 ± 6.6∗ | 29.9 ± 4.8# | 30.0 ± 3.8# |
CAPA was introduced after 2 weeks of diet exposure and orally treated once a day for another 2 weeks. Con: control mice; HF: mice fed with high fat and diet; HF2WCA2W: HF mice treated with CAPA for another 2 weeks; HF2WMET2W: HF mice treated with metformin for another 2 weeks; AAR: area at risk; ∗: P < 0.05 versus Con; #: P < 0.05 versus HF; n = 6–8 per group.
Metabolism and ischemic injury of mice after 4 weeks of STZ injection.
| After 4 weeks of STZ injection | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Con | STZ | S2WCA2W | |
| Body weight (g) | 35.5 ± 0.8 | 21.2 ± 2.9∗ | 24.0 ± 0.6∗, # |
| Plasma glucose (mg/dL) | 113.5 ± 4.5 | 588.0 ± 34.5∗ | 483.2 ± 24.0∗, # |
| Plasma insulin (pM) | 117.5 ± 8.8 | 8.3 ± 1.5∗ | 5.8 ± 1.0∗ |
| Basal coronary flow (mL/min) | 3.4 ± 0.5 | 1.5 ± 0.2∗ | 1.83 ± 0.3∗, # |
| Infarct size of the heart after global ischemia/reperfusion (% AAR) | 30.6 ± 5.1 | 51.3 ± 2.5∗ | 37.1 ± 5.8∗, # |
CAPA was introduced after 2 weeks of STZ injection and orally treated once a day for another 2 weeks. Con: control mice; STZ: streptozocin-induced type 1 diabetic mice; S2WCA2W: STZ mice treated with CAPA for another 2 weeks; AAR: area at risk; ∗: P < 0.05 versus Con; #: P < 0.05 versus STZ; n = 6–8 per group.
Figure 5Protein expressions in the livers and fats of BLTW : CD1(ICR) mice after 4 weeks of diet exposure and triglycerides accumulation in HepG2 cells. (a) Protein expression of TNFα in livers of mice. (b) Protein expression of p-p65 in livers of mice. (c) Expression of the antioxidant protein MnSOD in livers of mice. (d) Expression of PEPCK in livers of mice. (e) Expression of GLUT4 in fats of mice. (f) Protein expression of pIKKα/β and p-p65 in HepG2 cells. (g) H2O2 induced triglycerides accumulation in HepG2 cells. n = 3 per group; means ± SEM; Con: control mice; HF: mice fed with high fat and diet; HFCA or HC: HF mice treated with CAPA (CA); HFMET or HM: HF mice treated with metformin; *: P < 0.05 versus Con; #: P < 0.05 versus HF.