Literature DB >> 22777818

Toward the virtual cell: automated approaches to building models of subcellular organization "learned" from microscopy images.

Taráz E Buck1, Jieyue Li, Gustavo K Rohde, Robert F Murphy.   

Abstract

We review state-of-the-art computational methods for constructing, from image data, generative statistical models of cellular and nuclear shapes and the arrangement of subcellular structures and proteins within them. These automated approaches allow consistent analysis of images of cells for the purposes of learning the range of possible phenotypes, discriminating between them, and informing further investigation. Such models can also provide realistic geometry and initial protein locations to simulations in order to better understand cellular and subcellular processes. To determine the structures of cellular components and how proteins and other molecules are distributed among them, the generative modeling approach described here can be coupled with high throughput imaging technology to infer and represent subcellular organization from data with few a priori assumptions. We also discuss potential improvements to these methods and future directions for research.
Copyright © 2012 WILEY Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22777818      PMCID: PMC3428744          DOI: 10.1002/bies.201200032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioessays        ISSN: 0265-9247            Impact factor:   4.345


  31 in total

1.  Automatic identification of subcellular phenotypes on human cell arrays.

Authors:  Christian Conrad; Holger Erfle; Patrick Warnat; Nathalie Daigle; Thomas Lörch; Jan Ellenberg; Rainer Pepperkok; Roland Eils
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Dynamic proteomics in individual human cells uncovers widespread cell-cycle dependence of nuclear proteins.

Authors:  Alex Sigal; Ron Milo; Ariel Cohen; Naama Geva-Zatorsky; Yael Klein; Inbal Alaluf; Naamah Swerdlin; Natalie Perzov; Tamar Danon; Yuvalal Liron; Tal Raveh; Anne E Carpenter; Galit Lahav; Uri Alon
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 3.  Quantitative fluorescent speckle microscopy of cytoskeleton dynamics.

Authors:  Gaudenz Danuser; Clare M Waterman-Storer
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct       Date:  2006

4.  Comparison of quantitative methods for cell-shape analysis.

Authors:  Z Pincus; J A Theriot
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.758

5.  Image-derived, three-dimensional generative models of cellular organization.

Authors:  Tao Peng; Robert F Murphy
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 4.355

Review 6.  Continuum simulations of biomembrane dynamics and the importance of hydrodynamic effects.

Authors:  Frank L H Brown
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 5.318

7.  Instance-Based Generative Biological Shape Modeling.

Authors:  Tao Peng; Wei Wang; Gustavo K Rohde; Robert F Murphy
Journal:  Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging       Date:  2009

Review 8.  Communicating subcellular distributions.

Authors:  Robert F Murphy
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.355

9.  Modelling vesicular release at hippocampal synapses.

Authors:  Suhita Nadkarni; Thomas M Bartol; Terrence J Sejnowski; Herbert Levine
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  STEPS: efficient simulation of stochastic reaction-diffusion models in realistic morphologies.

Authors:  Iain Hepburn; Weiliang Chen; Stefan Wils; Erik De Schutter
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2012-05-10
View more
  9 in total

1.  Imagining the future of bioimage analysis.

Authors:  Erik Meijering; Anne E Carpenter; Hanchuan Peng; Fred A Hamprecht; Jean-Christophe Olivo-Marin
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 2.  Building cell models and simulations from microscope images.

Authors:  Robert F Murphy
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2015-10-17       Impact factor: 3.608

Review 3.  Quantifying Modes of 3D Cell Migration.

Authors:  Meghan K Driscoll; Gaudenz Danuser
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 20.808

4.  Highly multiplexed imaging of single cells using a high-throughput cyclic immunofluorescence method.

Authors:  Jia-Ren Lin; Mohammad Fallahi-Sichani; Peter K Sorger
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Metadata management for high content screening in OMERO.

Authors:  Simon Li; Sébastien Besson; Colin Blackburn; Mark Carroll; Richard K Ferguson; Helen Flynn; Kenneth Gillen; Roger Leigh; Dominik Lindner; Melissa Linkert; William J Moore; Balaji Ramalingam; Emil Rozbicki; Gabriella Rustici; Aleksandra Tarkowska; Petr Walczysko; Eleanor Williams; Chris Allan; Jean-Marie Burel; Josh Moore; Jason R Swedlow
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 3.608

6.  Joint modeling of cell and nuclear shape variation.

Authors:  Gregory R Johnson; Taraz E Buck; Devin P Sullivan; Gustavo K Rohde; Robert F Murphy
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 4.138

7.  Automated Learning of Subcellular Variation among Punctate Protein Patterns and a Generative Model of Their Relation to Microtubules.

Authors:  Gregory R Johnson; Jieyue Li; Aabid Shariff; Gustavo K Rohde; Robert F Murphy
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Using simulated fluorescence cell micrographs for the evaluation of cell image segmentation algorithms.

Authors:  Veit Wiesmann; Matthias Bergler; Ralf Palmisano; Martin Prinzen; Daniela Franz; Thomas Wittenberg
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-03-18       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Unbiased Rare Event Sampling in Spatial Stochastic Systems Biology Models Using a Weighted Ensemble of Trajectories.

Authors:  Rory M Donovan; Jose-Juan Tapia; Devin P Sullivan; James R Faeder; Robert F Murphy; Markus Dittrich; Daniel M Zuckerman
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 4.475

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.