Literature DB >> 22774858

Working memory capacity and Stroop interference: global versus local indices of executive control.

Matt E Meier1, Michael J Kane1.   

Abstract

Two experiments examined the relations among working memory capacity (WMC), congruency-sequence effects, proportion-congruency effects, and the color-word Stroop effect to test whether congruency-sequence effects might inform theoretical claims regarding WMC's prediction of Stroop interference. In Experiment 1, subjects completed either a high-congruency or low-congruency Stroop task that restricted trial-to-trial repetitions of stimulus dimensions to examine WMC's relation to congruency-sequence effects while minimizing bottom-up, stimulus-driven contributions. Congruency-sequence effects and congruency-proportion effects were significant but did not interact. WMC predicted global Stroop interference under low-congruency conditions but neither local congruency-sequence effects nor global Stroop interference under high-congruency conditions, contrary to previous studies (e.g., Kane & Engle, 2003). A high-congruency Stroop task in Experiment 2 removed the Experiment 1 task constraints, and, here, we obtained the typical, global association between WMC and Stroop interference but still no relation between WMC and congruency-sequence effects. We thus examined the methodological differences between Experiments 1 and 2 to determine whether any of these were locally responsible for the global WMC-related differences. They were not, suggesting that the changes between Experiments 1 and 2 created a general task context that engaged (or disengaged) the executive processes associated with WMC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22774858     DOI: 10.1037/a0029200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  20 in total

1.  Interpolated retrieval effects on list isolation: Individual differences in working memory capacity.

Authors:  Christopher N Wahlheim; Timothy R Alexander; Michael J Kane
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-05

Review 2.  A locus coeruleus-norepinephrine account of individual differences in working memory capacity and attention control.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Matthew K Robison
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08

3.  Stroop proactive control and task conflict are modulated by concurrent working memory load.

Authors:  Eyal Kalanthroff; Amir Avnit; Avishai Henik; Eddy J Davelaar; Marius Usher
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-06

4.  Testing the attention-distractibility trait.

Authors:  Matt E Meier
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-03-11

5.  Providing goal reminders eliminates the relationship between working memory capacity and Stroop errors.

Authors:  Audrey V B Hood; Keith A Hutchison
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Working memory capacity and intra-individual variability of proactive control.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Wiemers; Thomas S Redick
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2017-11-08

7.  The role of speed in ADHD-related working memory deficits: A time-based resource-sharing and diffusion model account.

Authors:  Alexander Weigard; Cynthia Huang-Pollock
Journal:  Clin Psychol Sci       Date:  2016-12-21

8.  Carving executive control at its joints: Working memory capacity predicts stimulus-stimulus, but not stimulus-response, conflict.

Authors:  Matt E Meier; Michael J Kane
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Interactive effects of working memory and trial history on Stroop interference in cognitively healthy aging.

Authors:  Andrew J Aschenbrenner; David A Balota
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2015-01-19

10.  The flexibility of cognitive control: Age equivalence with experience guiding the way.

Authors:  Emily R Cohen-Shikora; Nathaniel T Diede; Julie M Bugg
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2018-08-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.