Literature DB >> 30725377

Interpolated retrieval effects on list isolation: Individual differences in working memory capacity.

Christopher N Wahlheim1, Timothy R Alexander2, Michael J Kane2.   

Abstract

We examined the effects of interpolated retrieval from long-term memory (LTM) and short-term memory (STM) on list isolation in dual-list free recall and whether individual differences in working memory capacity (WMC) moderated those effects. Ninety-seven subjects completed study-test trials that included two study lists separated by either an exemplar generation task (LTM retrieval) or a two-back task (STM retrieval). Subjects then completed an externalized free recall task that allowed for the examination of response accessibility and monitoring. Individual differences in WMC were assessed using three complex span tasks: operation span, reading span, and rotation span. Correct recall and intratrial intrusion summary scores showed no effect of interpolated retrieval on either response accessibility or monitoring. However, serial-position curves for correct recall of List 1 showed larger primacy in the two-back than in the exemplar generation task for high-WMC subjects. We interpreted these results from a context change perspective, as showing that interpolated LTM retrieval accelerated context change for subjects who processed the context more effectively. We consider the implications of these findings for models of memory.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Context change; Control processes; Free recall; Interference; Working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30725377     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-019-00893-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  44 in total

1.  A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity.

Authors:  M J Kane; M K Bleckley; A R Conway; R W Engle
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2001-06

2.  Age dissociates recency and lag recency effects in free recall.

Authors:  Michael J Kahana; Marc W Howard; Franklin Zaromb; Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Variation in working memory capacity and temporal-contextual retrieval from episodic memory.

Authors:  Gregory J Spillers; Nash Unsworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Context change and retrieval difficulty in the list-before-last paradigm.

Authors:  Lili Sahakyan; Hannah E Hendricks
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-08

6.  Recall criterion does not affect recall level or hypermnesia: a puzzle for generate/recognize theories.

Authors:  H L Roediger; D G Payne
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1985-01

7.  Characterizing adult age differences in the initiation and organization of retrieval: A further investigation of retrieval dynamics in dual-list free recall.

Authors:  Christopher N Wahlheim; Lauren L Richmond; Mark J Huff; Ian G Dobbins
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2016-11

8.  Unexpected costs of high working memory capacity following directed forgetting and contextual change manipulations.

Authors:  Peter F Delaney; Lili Sahakyan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-07

9.  Variation in working memory capacity, fluid intelligence, and episodic recall: a latent variable examination of differences in the dynamics of free recall.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-09

10.  A context maintenance and retrieval model of organizational processes in free recall.

Authors:  Sean M Polyn; Kenneth A Norman; Michael J Kahana
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 8.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.