Literature DB >> 22772570

Reduction in radiation (fluoroscopy) while maintaining safe placement of pedicle screws during lumbar spine fusion.

Christopher D Chaput1, Keri George, Amer F Samdani, John I Williams, John Gaughan, Randal R Betz.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled study.
OBJECTIVE: To report the results of using the PediGuard (SpineGuard, Inc., San Francisco, CA), a local electrical conductivity measurement device, to reduce radiation exposure while drilling the pilot hole for pedicle screw placement. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Reports of pedicle screw placement in the lumbar spine have shown medial pedicle perforations with nerve root impingement in addition to lateral pedicle and vertebral body perforations that can impinge the nerve root within the psoas. Routine use of fluoroscopy (fluoro) is thought to reduce the risk of perforations but is associated with increased radiation. A new pedicle-drilling device (PediGuard) which uses electrical conductivity differentiation at the tip for assessing bone versus soft tissue, has been developed to improve the safe positioning of pedicle screws. This device not only warns of an impending medial breach but also is the only device available to, in real time, nonradiographically detect a lateral breach. METHODS.: Eighteen patients with a diagnosis of lumbar degenerative spine who had a posterior spinal fusion were enrolled. The average age of the patients was 55 ± 12 years. Postoperative computed tomographic scans were reviewed by an independent reviewer. Screws were considered "in" (<2 mm of breach) or "out" (≥ 2 mm of breach). In a randomized fashion, the surgeon placed a pilot hole either with a standard technique (manual probe) or the PediGuard, and used fluoro for each drilling as a guidance assist as necessary. Electromyographic testing was not done by the surgeon. A total of 78 screws (39 via standard probe and 39 with PediGuard assist) were analyzed.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in breach rate of 2 mm or more by either of the 2 methods (P = 1.000), with 1 screw out in each group. Fluoro shots averaged 5.2 (range, 0-15) per screw in the PediGuard group versus 7.5 (range, 2-17) in the standard group (P < 0.001). This represents an average decrease of 2.3 (30%) fluoro shots per screw with the PediGuard. There were 202 total fluoro shots used in the PediGuard group versus 293 in the standard group.
CONCLUSION: In this prospective, randomized trial of a pedicle drilling device that uses electrical conductivity differentiation at the tip for assessing bone versus soft tissue, the number of fluoro shots was reduced by 30% compared with a standard drilling probe while maintaining a 97.5% accurate, safe screw placement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22772570     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182666adc

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  9 in total

1.  Accuracy of a dynamic surgical guidance probe for screw insertion in the cervical spine: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Daniel Dixon; Bruce Darden; Jose Casamitjana; Karen A Weissmann; San Cristobal; David Powell; Daniel Baluch
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  A CT-based study investigating the relationship between pedicle screw placement and stimulation threshold of compound muscle action potentials measured by intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring.

Authors:  Gerit Kulik; Etienne Pralong; John McManus; Damien Debatisse; Constantin Schizas
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-05-19       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  S2-AI screw placement with the aide of electronic conductivity device monitoring: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Faheem A Sandhu; Jason E McGowan; Daniel R Felbaum; Hasan R Syed; Kyle B Mueller
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Erratum: A novel probe for measuring tissue bioelectrical impedance to enhance pedicle screw placement in spinal surgery.

Authors:  Zheng Li; Chong Chen; Youxi Lin; Xingye Li; Haining Tan; Matthew Tv Chan; William Kk Wu; Songtao Zhan; Qun Cao; Jianxiong Shen
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 3.940

5.  Feasibility of Endoscopic Inspection of Pedicle Wall Integrity in a Live Surgery Model.

Authors:  Kristen Radcliff; Harvey Smith; Bobby Kalantar; Robert Isaacs; Barrett Woods; Alexander R Vaccaro; James Brannon
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-03

6.  Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Placement Comparing an Electronic Conductivity Device and a Multi-axis Angiography Unit with C-arm Fluoroscopy in Lumbar Fixation Surgery for Safety.

Authors:  Hiroto Kageyama; Shinichi Yoshimura; Kotaro Tatebayashi; Tomoko Iida; Kiyofumi Yamada
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 1.742

7.  Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Placement Methods in Pediatrics and Adolescents Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Brigita De Vega; Aida Ribera Navarro; Alexander Gibson; Deepak M Kalaskar
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2021-03-18

8.  Usefulness of a New Electronic Conductivity Device with a Pedicle Probe and a Multi-axis Angiography Unit for Inserting a C1 Lateral Mass Screw Safely and Tightly: A Technical Note.

Authors:  Hiroto Kageyama; Shinichi Yoshimura; Kenichi Matsuda; Yasunori Yoshida; Hidetoshi Matsukawa; Kiyofumi Yamada
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 1.742

9.  Improved Accuracy and Safety of Pedicle Screw Placement by Using a Probe with an Electrical Conductivity-Measuring Device during Severe Syndromic and Neuromuscular Scoliosis Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Takashi Yurube; Yutaro Kanda; Masaaki Ito; Yoshiki Takeoka; Teppei Suzuki; Koki Uno; Ryosuke Kuroda; Kenichiro Kakutani
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 4.241

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.