Literature DB >> 2277250

Survival among women with cancer of the uterine cervix: influence of marital status and social class.

M Murphy1, P Goldblatt, H Thornton-Jones, P Silcocks.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: The aim was to investigate whether the survival of women with cancer of the uterine cervix is associated with their marital status and social class.
DESIGN: The study was a survey of survival up to 5 years from diagnosis of women with cancer of the cervix registered in the South Thames Cancer Registry, using Cox regression to adjust for marital status, social class, age, and stage at registration. Because of deficiencies in social class data held by the Registry (social class was assigned in only 51% of cases, as opposed to 93% for marital status), the findings were compared with survival data from the OPCS Longitudinal Study.
SETTING: During the period of study (1977-81) the South Thames Cancer Registry covered a female population of about 3.5 million in the south east of England. PATIENTS: Data on 1728 women were analysed. MEASUREMENTS AND AND MAIN
RESULTS: Apparent differences in crude survival by marital status and social class were examined. These were found to be accounted for by adjustment for age and stage. The better survival of those whose social class was unknown was found to be an artefact of the way in which cancer registries assign social class, but this did not appear to bias registry based studies of social class survival seriously.
CONCLUSIONS: (1) After adjusting for age, factors affecting survival in women with cancer of the cervix, such as stage at presentation or host resistance, appear to be similarly distributed in the different marital status and social class groups; (2) for cervical cancer, the marked social class gradient and unusual marital status distribution found in cross sectional mortality data reflect the incidence of the disease, not differences in survival; (3) explanations for these patterns in incidence and mortality data are to be found in the aetiology of the disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2277250      PMCID: PMC1060672          DOI: 10.1136/jech.44.4.293

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  22 in total

1.  Occult advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  B G Ward; J H Shepherd; J M Monaghan
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-05-04

2.  Bereavement and cancer: some data on deaths of spouses from the longitudinal study of Office of Population Censuses and Surveys.

Authors:  D R Jones; P O Goldblatt; D A Leon
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-08-25

3.  Failures of the cervical cytology screening programme.

Authors:  J Chamberlain
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-10-06

4.  Attendance for cervical screening--whose problem?

Authors:  A Eardley; A K Elkind; B Spencer; P Hobbs; L L Pendleton; D Haran
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Cancer incidence by marital status: U.S. Third National Cancer Survey.

Authors:  V L Ernster; S T Sacks; S Selvin; N L Petrakis
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Importance of the male factor in cancer of the cervix.

Authors:  D C Skegg; P A Corwin; C Paul; R Doll
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1982-09-11       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Case-control study of the husbands of women with dysplasia or carcinoma of the cervix uteri.

Authors:  J D Buckley; R W Harris; R Doll; M P Vessey; P T Williams
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1981-11-07       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Economic status and survival of cancer patients.

Authors:  J W Berg; R Ross; H B Latourette
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Incidence of cervical cancer by marital status.

Authors:  I Leck; K Sibary; J Wakefield
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health (1978)       Date:  1978-06

10.  Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. II. analysis and examples.

Authors:  R Peto; M C Pike; P Armitage; N E Breslow; D R Cox; S V Howard; N Mantel; K McPherson; J Peto; P G Smith
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  15 in total

1.  Social class, marital status, and cancer of the uterine cervix in England and Wales, 1950-1983.

Authors:  M F Murphy; D C Mant; P O Goldblatt
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Ethnic disparities in cervical cancer survival among Texas women.

Authors:  Ann L Coker; Christopher P Desimone; Katherine S Eggleston; Arica L White; Melanie Williams
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  Measuring social class differences in cancer patient survival: is it necessary to control for social class differences in general population mortality? A Finnish population-based study.

Authors:  P W Dickman; A Auvinen; E T Voutilainen; T Hakulinen
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Cancer risk and prognosis in Norway: comparing women in their first marriage with women who have never married.

Authors:  A Kvikstad; L J Vatten
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 5.  Cancer patient survival by socioeconomic status in seven countries: a review for six common cancer sites [corrected].

Authors:  C T Schrijvers; J P Mackenbach
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 6.  Associations of social networks with cancer mortality: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Martin Pinquart; Paul R Duberstein
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 6.312

7.  Prevalence of human papillomavirus in university young women.

Authors:  Maria T Montalvo; Ismelda Lobato; Hilda Villanueva; Celia Borquez; Daniela Navarrete; Juan Abarca; Gloria M Calaf
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 2.967

8.  Disparities in cervical cancer survival among Asian-American women.

Authors:  Van T Nghiem; Kalatu R Davies; Wenyaw Chan; Zuber D Mulla; Scott B Cantor
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 3.797

9.  Racial differences in cervical cancer survival in the Detroit metropolitan area.

Authors:  Sujana Movva; Anne-Michelle Noone; Mousumi Banerjee; Divya A Patel; Kendra Schwartz; Cecilia L Yee; Michael S Simon
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Racial disparities in cervical cancer mortality in an African American and European American cohort in South Carolina.

Authors:  Swann Arp Adams; Alexandria Fleming; Heather M Brandt; Deborah Hurley; Susan Bolick-Aldrich; Sharon M Bond; James R Hebert
Journal:  J S C Med Assoc       Date:  2009-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.