Literature DB >> 288925

Cancer incidence by marital status: U.S. Third National Cancer Survey.

V L Ernster, S T Sacks, S Selvin, N L Petrakis.   

Abstract

Site-specific cancer incidence rates were computed by sex, age, and marital status for whites and blacks separately for ages 35-64 years with the use of population-based incidence data from the Third National Cancer Survey (1969-71) and with demographic data from the 1970 U.S. Census. Although rates were presented for all cancer sites combined and for 44 specific sites or rubrics, discussion focused on the 17 most common cancers. Within age, race, and sex groups, patterns of cancer incidence by marital status were compared by means of standardized incidence ratios, and the consistency of marital status patterns across age groups was assessed statistically. Among the most notable findings were: excess cancer rates across most sites and age groups in single black males, consistently high rates for cancer of the lung and bronchus in divorced white males and in single black females, low rates for the hormone-dependent reproductive tumors (prostate gland, breast, uterine corpus, and ovary) in separated white males and females, and high rates for cervical cancer among separated white women. Marital status patterns, where found, frequently differed between whites and blacks and between males and females.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 288925     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/63.3.567

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  12 in total

1.  The health-related functions of social support.

Authors:  C Schaefer; J C Coyne; R S Lazarus
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1981-12

2.  Cancer risk and prognosis in Norway: comparing women in their first marriage with women who have never married.

Authors:  A Kvikstad; L J Vatten
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Survival among women with cancer of the uterine cervix: influence of marital status and social class.

Authors:  M Murphy; P Goldblatt; H Thornton-Jones; P Silcocks
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Are there differences in outcomes by race among women with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer?

Authors:  Bridget A Oppong; Angel A Rolle; Amara Ndumele; Yaming Li; James L Fisher; Oindrila Bhattacharyya; Toyin Adeyanju; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 4.624

5.  Reproductive risk factors for colorectal adenomatous polyps (New York City, NY, United States).

Authors:  J S Jacobson; A I Neugut; G C Garbowski; H Ahsan; J D Waye; M R Treat; K A Forde
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.506

6.  Assessing the relationship between marital status and cancer incidence: methodologic considerations.

Authors:  K Zhu; N S Weiss; S M Schwartz; J R Daling
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 7.  Reproductive factors and colorectal cancer.

Authors:  C La Vecchia; S Franceschi
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 2.506

8.  Cancer of the pancreas in two brothers and one sister.

Authors:  P Ghadirian; A Simard; J Baillargeon
Journal:  Int J Pancreatol       Date:  1987 Oct-Dec

9.  Magnitude and causes of mortality differences between married and unmarried men.

Authors:  Y Ben-Shlomo; G D Smith; M Shipley; M G Marmot
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 10.  Role of cadmium in carcinogenesis with special reference to cancer of the prostate.

Authors:  M Piscator
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.