Literature DB >> 22768884

Intraoperative accuracy of a point-of-care glucose meter compared with simultaneous central laboratory measurements.

Boris Mraovic1, Eric S Schwenk, Richard H Epstein.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Concerns have been raised about the use of point-of-care (POC) glucose meters in the hospital setting. Accuracy has been questioned especially in critically ill patients. Although commonly used in intensive care units and operating rooms, POC meters were not approved by the Food and Drug Administration for such use. Data on POC glucose meter performance during anesthesia are lacking. We evaluated accuracy of a POC meter in the intraoperative setting.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 4,333 intraoperative records in which at least one intraoperative glucose was measured using electronic medical records at a large academic hospital. We evaluated the accuracy of a POC glucose meter (ACCU-CHEK® Inform, Roche Pharmaceuticals) based on the 176 simultaneous central laboratory (CL) blood glucose (BG) measurements that were found (i.e., documented collection times within 5 minutes). Point-of-care and central lab BG differences were analyzed by Bland-Altman and revised error grid analysis (rEGA).
RESULTS: Mean POC BG was 163.4 ± 64.7 mg/dl [minimum (min) 48 mg/dl, maximum (max) 537 mg/dl] and mean CL BG was 162.6 ± 65.1 mg/dl (min 44 mg/dl, max 502 mg/dl). Mean absolute difference between POC and CL BG was 24.3 mg/dl. Mean absolute relative difference was 16.5% with standard deviation 26.4%. Point-of-care measurements showed a bias of 0.8 relative to the corresponding CL value, with a precision of 39.0 mg/dl. Forty (23%) POC BG values fell outside the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guideline and 3.4% POC measurements fell in zones C and D of the rEGA plot.
CONCLUSIONS: The tested POC glucose meter performed poorly compared to a CL analyzer intraoperatively. Perioperative clinicians should be aware of limitations of specific POC glucose meters, and routine use of POC glucose meters as sole measurement devices in the intraoperative period should be carefully considered.
© 2012 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22768884      PMCID: PMC3440046          DOI: 10.1177/193229681200600308

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  19 in total

1.  Why Bland-Altman plots should use X, not (Y+X)/2 when X is a reference method.

Authors:  Jan S Krouwer
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 2.  Review article: glucose measurement in the operating room: more complicated than it seems.

Authors:  Mark J Rice; Andrew D Pitkin; Douglas B Coursin
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2010-02-08       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 3.  Perioperative considerations in diabetic patients.

Authors:  Yuji Kadoi
Journal:  Curr Diabetes Rev       Date:  2010-07

4.  Evaluating clinical accuracy of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose.

Authors:  W L Clarke; D Cox; L A Gonder-Frederick; W Carter; S L Pohl
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1987 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 19.112

5.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Agreement between bedside blood and plasma glucose measurement in the ICU setting.

Authors:  Javier Daniel Finkielman; Lance J Oyen; Bekele Afessa
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 9.410

7.  Analysis of blood glucose measurements using capillary and arterial blood samples in intensive care patients.

Authors:  Atul Kulkarni; Manoj Saxena; Grant Price; Michael J O'Leary; Theresa Jacques; John A Myburgh
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-11-23       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Pilot study of the accuracy of bedside glucometry in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  J G Ray; C Hamielec; T Mastracci
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  Accuracy of bedside capillary blood glucose measurements in critically ill patients.

Authors:  C Dana Critchell; Vincent Savarese; Amy Callahan; Christine Aboud; Serge Jabbour; Paul Marik
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Plasma-equivalent glucose at the point-of-care: evaluation of Roche Accu-Chek Inform and Abbott Precision PCx glucose meters.

Authors:  Timothy Ghys; Wim Goedhuys; Katrien Spincemaille; Frans Gorus; Erik Gerlo
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 3.786

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Challenges of inpatient blood glucose monitoring: standards, methods, and devices to measure blood glucose.

Authors:  Kathie L Hermayer; Aundrea S Loftley; Sumana Reddy; Satya Nandana Narla; Nina A Epps; Yusheng Zhu
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.810

2.  Accuracy of Capillary and Arterial Whole Blood Glucose Measurements Using a Glucose Meter in Patients under General Anesthesia in the Operating Room.

Authors:  Brad S Karon; Leslie J Donato; Chelsie M Larsen; Lindsay K Siebenaler; Amy E Wells; Christina M Wood-Wentz; Mary E Shirk-Marienau; Timothy B Curry
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  Accuracy of blood glucose measurements using the NOVA StatStrip® glucometer during cardiac surgery: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Yosuke Nakadate; Hiroaki Sato; Patricia Roque; Tamaki Sato; Takashi Matsukawa; Linda Wykes; Akiko Kawakami; Thomas Schricker
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 4.  Guidelines for Perioperative Management of the Diabetic Patient.

Authors:  Sivakumar Sudhakaran; Salim R Surani
Journal:  Surg Res Pract       Date:  2015-05-19
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.