Literature DB >> 22768361

Genome sequence of the homoacetogenic bacterium Holophaga foetida type strain (TMBS4(T)).

Iain Anderson, Brittany Held, Alla Lapidus, Matt Nolan, Susan Lucas, Hope Tice, Tijana Glavina Del Rio, Jan-Fang Cheng, Cliff Han, Roxanne Tapia, Lynne A Goodwin, Sam Pitluck, Konstantinos Liolios, Konstantinos Mavromatis, Ioanna Pagani, Natalia Ivanova, Natalia Mikhailova, Amrita Pati, Amy Chen, Krishna Palaniappan, Miriam Land, Evelyne-Marie Brambilla, Manfred Rohde, Stefan Spring, Markus Göker, John C Detter, Tanja Woyke, James Bristow, Jonathan A Eisen, Victor Markowitz, Philip Hugenholtz, Hans-Peter Klenk, Nikos C Kyrpides.   

Abstract

Holophaga foetida Liesack et al. 1995 is a member of the phylum Acidobacteria and is of interest for its ability to anaerobically degrade aromatic compounds and for its production of volatile sulfur compounds through a unique pathway. The genome of H. foetida strain TMBS4(T) is the first to be sequenced for a representative of the class Holophagae. Here we describe the features of this organism, together with the complete genome sequence (improved high quality draft), and annotation. The 4,127,237 bp long chromosome with its 3,615 protein-coding and 57 RNA genes is a part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acidobacteria; GEBA; Gram-negative; Holophagaceae; anaerobic; chemoorganotrophic; fresh water mud; mesophilic; motile; sulfide-methylation

Year:  2012        PMID: 22768361      PMCID: PMC3387795          DOI: 10.4056/sigs.2746047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

Strain TMBS4T (= DSM 6591) is the type strain of the species Holophaga foetida [1], which is the type species of the monospecific genus Holophaga [1,2]. The genus Holophaga is the type genus of the family Holophagaceae [3] in the order Holophagales [3] within the class Holophagae [3]. The genus name was derived from a combination of the Neo-Greek term holos, whole, and the Greek term phagein, to eat, meaning eating it all [1]; the species epithet was derived from the Latin adjective foetidus, smelling, stinking, referring to the production of foul-smelling methanethiol and dimethylsulfide [1]. Strain TMBS4T was originally isolated from a black anoxic freshwater mud sample from a ditch near Konstanz, Germany [4]. It was found to transfer methyl groups from methoxylated aromatic compounds to sulfide, forming methanethiol and dimethylsulfide [4]. Dimethylsulfide plays an important role in atmospheric chemistry, and is produced mainly by marine bacteria from dimethylsulfoniopropionate (reviewed in [5]). The production of dimethylsulfide from methoxylated aromatic compounds represents a unique pathway for production of this important compound. Strain TMBS4T anaerobically degrades several aromatic compounds to acetate [1,4]. The only other cultured species within the order Holophagales is Geothrix fermentans, which is also an anaerobe but degrades small organic acids and fatty acids using Fe(III) as an electron acceptor [6]. Here we present a summary classification and a set of features for H. foetida TMBS4T, together with the description of the genomic sequencing and annotation.

Classification and features

A representative genomic 16S rRNA sequence of H. foetida TMBS4T was compared using NCBI BLAST [7,8] under default settings (e.g., considering only the high-scoring segment pairs (HSPs) from the best 250 hits) with the most recent release of the Greengenes database [9] and the relative frequencies of taxa and keywords (reduced to their stem [10]) were determined, weighted by BLAST scores. The most frequently occurring genera were Holophaga (52.9%), Geothrix (33.7%) and Acidobacterium (13.4%) (5 hits in total). Regarding the two hits to sequences from members of the species, the average identity within HSPs was 99.7%, whereas the average coverage by HSPs was 100.0%. Among all other species, the one yielding the highest score was G. fermentans (NR_036779), which corresponded to an identity of 91.6% and a HSP coverage of 97.8%. (Note that the Greengenes database uses the INSDC (= EMBL/NCBI/DDBJ) annotation, which is not an authoritative source for nomenclature or classification.) The highest-scoring environmental sequence was DQ676369 ('Archaeal sediment and plankton freshwater pond suboxic freshwater-pond clone MVP-105'), which showed an identity of 97.6% and a HSP coverage of 94.9%. The most frequently occurring keywords within the labels of all environmental samples which yielded hits were 'lake' (6.2%), 'aquat' (4.6%), 'gatun, rank' (4.3%), 'soil' (3.4%) and 'microbi' (2.1%) (245 hits in total). The most frequently occurring keywords within the labels of those environmental samples which yielded hits of a higher score than the highest scoring species were 'situ' (3.3%), 'microbi' (3.0%), 'groundwat' (2.8%), 'activ' (2.5%) and 'aquif' (2.5%) (42 hits in total), all of which are keywords with biological meaning fitting the environment from which strain TMBS4T was isolated. Figure 1 shows the phylogenetic neighborhood of H. foetida in a 16S rRNA based tree. The sequences of the two identical 16S rRNA gene copies in the genome differ by two nucleotides from the previously published 16S rRNA sequence (X77215), which contains one ambiguous base call.
Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of H. foetida relative to the type strains of the other species within the phylum 'Acidobacteria'. The tree was inferred from 1,395 aligned characters [11,12] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood (ML) criterion [13]. Rooting was done initially using the midpoint method [14] and then checked for its agreement with the current classification (Table 1). The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers adjacent to the branches are support values from 400 ML bootstrap replicates [15] (left) and from 1,000 maximum-parsimony bootstrap replicates [16] (right) if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [17] are labeled with one asterisk, those also listed as 'Complete and Published' with two asterisks [18] (see CP002467 for Terriglobus saanensis).

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of H. foetida relative to the type strains of the other species within the phylum 'Acidobacteria'. The tree was inferred from 1,395 aligned characters [11,12] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood (ML) criterion [13]. Rooting was done initially using the midpoint method [14] and then checked for its agreement with the current classification (Table 1). The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers adjacent to the branches are support values from 400 ML bootstrap replicates [15] (left) and from 1,000 maximum-parsimony bootstrap replicates [16] (right) if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [17] are labeled with one asterisk, those also listed as 'Complete and Published' with two asterisks [18] (see CP002467 for Terriglobus saanensis).
Table 1

Classification and general features of H. foetida TMBS4T according to the MIGS recommendations [19].

MIGS ID    Property     Term   Evidence code
    Current classification     Domain Bacteria   TAS [20]
     Phylum Acidobacteria   TAS [21,22]
     Class Holophagae   TAS [3]
     Order Holophagales   TAS [3]
     Family Holophagaceae   TAS [3]
     Genus Holophaga   TAS [1,23]
     Species Holophaga foetida   TAS [1,23]
     Type-strain TMBS4   TAS [1]
    Gram stain     negative   TAS [1]
    Cell shape     rod-shaped   TAS [1,4]
    Motility     non-motile   TAS [1,4]
    Sporulation     non-sporulating   TAS [4]
    Temperature range     mesophile, 10-35°C   TAS [1,4]
    Optimum temperature     28-32°C   TAS [1,4]
    Salinity     1-15 g/l NaCl   TAS [4]
MIGS-22    Oxygen requirement     obligate anaerobe   TAS [1,4]
    Carbon source     methoxylated and hydroxylated aromatic compounds, pyruvate   TAS [1]
    Energy metabolism     chemoorganotroph   TAS [1]
MIGS-6    Habitat     freshwater mud   TAS [1]
MIGS-15    Biotic relationship     free living   TAS [1]
MIGS-14    Pathogenicity     none   NAS
    Biosafety level     1   TAS [24]
MIGS-23.1    Isolation     freshwater mud   TAS [1]
MIGS-4    Geographic location     near Konstanz, Germany   TAS [1]
MIGS-5    Sample collection time     1989 or earlier   NAS
MIGS-4.1    Latitude     47.663   TAS [1]
MIGS-4.2    Longitude     9.175   TAS [1]
MIGS-4.3    Depth     not reported
MIGS-4.4    Altitude     not reported

Evidence codes - TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [25].

Evidence codes - TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [25]. H. foetida TMBS4T is Gram-negative, and an electron micrograph shows an inner and outer membrane [1]. Cells are rod-shaped, 1-3 μm long and 0.5-0.7 μm wide [1,4] (Figure 2). No motility was observed [1,4], although the genome is rich in genes classified under ‘cell motility’ (152 genes). Growth was observed between 10°C and 35°C with an optimum at 28-32°C [1,4]. The pH range for growth was 5.5-8.0 with 6.8-7.5 as the optimum [1,4]. The salinity range for growth was 1-15 g/l NaCl [4]. Aromatic compounds utilized by TMBS4T include 3,4,5-trimethoxybenzoate, syringate, 5-hydroxyvanillate, phloroglucinol monomethyl ether, sinapate, ferulate, caffeate, gallate, 2,4,6-trihydroxybenzoate, pyrogallol, and phloroglucinol [1,4]. The fastest growth occurred with syringate [4]. When sulfide was present in the medium, methyl groups from aromatic compounds were used to form methanethiol and dimethylsulfide [1,4]. Strain TMBS4T could also grow with CO or CO2 as methyl acceptors, and acetyl-CoA synthase activity was detected [26]. Growth was also observed on pyruvate [1,4].
Figure 2

Scanning electron micrograph of H. foetida TMBS4T

Scanning electron micrograph of H. foetida TMBS4T

Genome sequencing and annotation

Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its phylogenetic position [27], and is part of the enomic ncyclopedia of acteria and rchaea project [28]. The genome project is deposited in the Genomes On Line Database [17] and the complete genome sequence is deposited in GenBank. Sequencing, finishing and annotation were performed by the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI). A summary of the project information is shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Genome sequencing project information

MIGS ID   Property    Term
MIGS-31   Finishing quality    Improved high quality draft
MIGS-28   Libraries used    Four genomic libraries: two 454 pyrosequence standard libraries,    one 454 PE library (11.5 kb insert size), one Illumina library
MIGS-29   Sequencing platforms    Illumina GAii, 454 GS FLX Titanium
MIGS-31.2   Sequencing coverage    2,172.4 × Illumina; 20.0 × pyrosequence
MIGS-30   Assemblers    Newbler version 2.3, Velvet version 1.0.13, phrap version SPS - 4.24
MIGS-32   Gene calling method    Prodigal
   INSDC ID    AGSB00000000
   GenBank Date of Release    January 12, 2012
   GOLD ID    Gi05348
   NCBI project ID    53485
   Database: IMG-GEBA    2509601028
MIGS-13   Source material identifier    DSM 6591
   Project relevance    Tree of Life, GEBA, Bioremediation

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

H. foetida strain TMBS4T, DSM 6591, was grown anaerobically in DSMZ medium 559 (TMBS4 medium) [29] at 30°C. DNA was isolated from 0.5-1 g of cell paste using MasterPure Gram-positive DNA purification kit (Epicentre MGP04100) following the standard protocol as recommended by the manufacturer with modification st/DL for cell lysis as described in Wu et al. 2009 [28]. DNA is available through the DNA Bank Network [30].

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome was sequenced using a combination of Illumina and 454 sequencing platforms. All general aspects of library construction and sequencing can be found at the JGI website [31]. Pyrosequencing reads were assembled using the Newbler assembler (Roche). The initial Newbler assembly consisting of 186 contigs in two scaffolds was converted into a phrap [32] assembly by making fake reads from the consensus, to collect the read pairs in the 454 paired end library. Illumina GAii sequencing data (9,124.2 Mb) was assembled with Velvet [33] and the consensus sequences were shredded into 1.5 kb overlapped fake reads and assembled together with the 454 data. The 454 draft assembly was based on 135.9 Mb of 454 draft data and all of the 454 paired end data. Newbler parameters are -consed -a 50 -l 350 -g -m -ml 20. The Phred/Phrap/Consed software package [32] was used for sequence assembly and quality assessment in the subsequent finishing process. After the shotgun stage, reads were assembled with parallel phrap (High Performance Software, LLC). Possible mis-assemblies were corrected with gapResolution (C. Han, unpublished), Dupfinisher [34], or sequencing cloned bridging PCR fragments with subcloning. Gaps between contigs were closed by editing in Consed, by PCR and by Bubble PCR primer walks (J.-F. Chang, unpublished). A total of 192 additional reactions were necessary to close some gaps and to raise the quality of the assembled sequence. Illumina reads were also used to correct potential base errors and increase consensus quality using a software Polisher developed at JGI [35]. The error rate of the assembled genome sequence is less than 1 in 100,000. Together, the combination of the Illumina and 454 sequencing platforms provided 2,192.4 × coverage of the genome. The final assembly contained 461,984 pyrosequence and 120,055,671 Illumina reads and consists of 39 contigs organized in three scaffolds.

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Prodigal [36] as part of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory genome annotation pipeline, followed by a round of manual curation using the JGI GenePRIMP pipeline [37]. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) non-redundant database, UniProt, TIGRFam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. These data sources were combined to assert a product description for each predicted protein. Non-coding genes and miscellaneous features were predicted using tRNAscan-SE [38], RNAMMer [39], Rfam [40], TMHMM [41], and signalP [42].

Genome properties

The genome in its current assembly consists of three scaffolds with lengths of 3,443,192 bp, 677,300 bp and 6,745 bp and a 63.0% G+C content (Table 3 and Figure 3). Of the 3,672 predicted genes, 3,615 were protein-coding genes, and 57 RNAs; 76 pseudogenes were also identified. The majority of the protein-coding genes (74.3%) were assigned a putative function while the remaining ones were annotated as hypothetical proteins. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 4.
Table 3

Genome Statistics

Attribute    Value   % of Total
Genome size (bp)    4,127,237   100.00%
DNA coding region (bp)    3,689,184   89.39%
DNA G+C content (bp)    2,595,845   62.95%
Number of scaffolds    3
Total genes    3,672   100.00%
RNA genes    57   1.55%
rRNA operons    2
tRNA genes    47   1.28%
Protein-coding genes    3,615   98.45%
Pseudo genes    76   2.07%
Genes with function prediction (proteins)    2,728   74.29%
Genes in paralog clusters    1,916   52.18%
Genes assigned to COGs    2,788   75.93%
Genes assigned Pfam domains    2,729   74.32%
Genes with signal peptides    746   20.32%
Genes with transmembrane helices    703   19.14%
CRISPR repeats    1
Figure 3

Graphical map of the largest scaffold. From left to the right: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Table 4

Number of genes associated with the general COG functional categories

Code   value   %age    Description
J   159   5.1    Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
A   2   0.1    RNA processing and modification
K   254   8.1    Transcription
L   191   6.1    Replication, recombination and repair
B   0   0.0    Chromatin structure and dynamics
D   35   1.1    Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning
Y   0   0.0    Nuclear structure
V   54   1.7    Defense mechanisms
T   267   8.5    Signal transduction mechanisms
M   194   6.2    Cell wall/membrane biogenesis
N   152   4.8    Cell motility
Z   1   0.0    Cytoskeleton
W   0   0.0    Extracellular structures
U   112   3.6    Intracellular trafficking and secretion, and vesicular transport
O   94   3.0    Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C   245   7.8    Energy production and conversion
G   120   3.8    Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E   201   6.4    Amino acid transport and metabolism
F   69   2.2    Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H   183   5.8    Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I   87   2.8    Lipid transport and metabolism
P   135   4.3    Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q   32   1.0    Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R   361   11.5    General function prediction only
S   201   6.4    Function unknown
-   884   24.1    Not in COGs
Graphical map of the largest scaffold. From left to the right: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Insights into the genome sequence

H. foetida is known to utilize aromatic compounds through the phloroglucinol pathway, producing three molecules of acetate from the benzene ring. It is also capable of growing on methoxylated aromatic compounds, transferring methyl groups to sulfide or CO2 to produce dimethylsulfide or acetyl-CoA. Genes have not been identified for the enzymes of the phloroglucinol pathway with one exception: the transhydroxylase that converts pyrogallol to phloroglucinol, which has been identified in Pelobacter acidigallici [43]. This enzyme has two subunits, and genes with high similarity to these subunits are found in H. foetida. HolfoDRAFT_0037 and HolfoDRAFT_0041 have 74% and 88% similarity to the large subunit, while HolfoDRAFT_0036, HolfoDRAFT_0040, and HolfoDRAFT_0058 have 63%, 73%, and 65% similarity to the small subunit. H. foetida likely gains energy from the conversion of acetyl-CoA produced from aromatic compounds, pyruvate, and methyl groups from methoxylated aromatic compounds to acetate. Within the genome, there are two phosphotransacetylase genes (HolfoDRAFT_0402, HolfoDRAFT_1130) and two acetate kinase genes (HolfoDRAFT_1418, HolfoDRAFT_3547). Several candidates for pyruvate:ferredoxin oxidoreductase were found in the genome. This enzyme would produce acetyl-CoA that can be used to produce ATP and acetate. H. foetida can combine methyl groups with CO or CO2 to form acetyl-CoA, and acetyl-CoA synthase activity was detected [26]. Also within the genome, there are genes for a Moorella-type CO dehydrogenase/acetyl-CoA synthase (HolfoDRAFT_1152 and HolfoDRAFT_1153) and the two subunits of the corrinoid Fe-S protein (HolfoDRAFT_1154 and HolfoDRAFT_1157). H. foetida has potential symporters and ABC transporters for aromatic compounds. Four genes (HolfoDRAFT_0048, HolfoDRAFT_0224, HolfoDRAFT_0791, HolfoDRAFT_0858) belonging to the major facilitator superfamily have strong similarity to aromatic compound transporters of family 2.A.1.15. H. foetida has few ABC transporters for organic compounds, but it has 3 full transporters and 8 additional substrate binding proteins from family 4. Some members of this family are amino acid transporters, but one member has been found to transport protocatechuate [44]. Systems for demethylation of methoxyaromatic compounds have been identified in Acetobacterium dehalogenans [45] and Moorella thermoacetica [46]. Methyl groups are transferred first to a corrinoid protein, then to tetrahydrofolate, by two methyltransferases. The genes for two sets of enzymes from A. dehalogenans have been sequenced [47]. The corrinoid proteins belong to COG5012, the first methyltransferases belong to COG0407, and the second methyltransferases belong to COG1410. H. foetida likely uses the same type of process. It has six proteins belonging to COG5012 and 29 proteins belonging to COG0407. The only genome with more members of COG0407 is Mahella australiensis [48] with 33. Some of the COG0407 proteins are found close to corrinoid proteins in the genome sequence. H. foetida has two members of COG1410. One is adjacent to the CO dehydrogenase/acetyl-CoA synthase genes and has 61% identity to the acsE gene of M. thermoacetica. It probably transfers methyl groups from tetrahydrofolate to the corrinoid iron-sulfur protein of CO dehydrogenase/acetyl-CoA synthase. The other COG1410 gene is adjacent to a corrinoid protein and may transfer methyl groups from corrinoid proteins to tetrahydrofolate in the methoxyaromatic demethylation pathway.
  33 in total

1.  Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes.

Authors:  A Krogh; B Larsson; G von Heijne; E L Sonnhammer
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-01-19       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis.

Authors:  J Castresana
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  GenePRIMP: a gene prediction improvement pipeline for prokaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Amrita Pati; Natalia N Ivanova; Natalia Mikhailova; Galina Ovchinnikova; Sean D Hooper; Athanasios Lykidis; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-05-02       Impact factor: 28.547

4.  Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB.

Authors:  T Z DeSantis; P Hugenholtz; N Larsen; M Rojas; E L Brodie; K Keller; T Huber; D Dalevi; P Hu; G L Andersen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs.

Authors:  Daniel R Zerbino; Ewan Birney
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Three genomes from the phylum Acidobacteria provide insight into the lifestyles of these microorganisms in soils.

Authors:  Naomi L Ward; Jean F Challacombe; Peter H Janssen; Bernard Henrissat; Pedro M Coutinho; Martin Wu; Gary Xie; Daniel H Haft; Michelle Sait; Jonathan Badger; Ravi D Barabote; Brent Bradley; Thomas S Brettin; Lauren M Brinkac; David Bruce; Todd Creasy; Sean C Daugherty; Tanja M Davidsen; Robert T DeBoy; J Chris Detter; Robert J Dodson; A Scott Durkin; Anuradha Ganapathy; Michelle Gwinn-Giglio; Cliff S Han; Hoda Khouri; Hajnalka Kiss; Sagar P Kothari; Ramana Madupu; Karen E Nelson; William C Nelson; Ian Paulsen; Kevin Penn; Qinghu Ren; M J Rosovitz; Jeremy D Selengut; Susmita Shrivastava; Steven A Sullivan; Roxanne Tapia; L Sue Thompson; Kisha L Watkins; Qi Yang; Chunhui Yu; Nikhat Zafar; Liwei Zhou; Cheryl R Kuske
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-02-05       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Acanthopleuribacter pedis gen. nov., sp. nov., a marine bacterium isolated from a chiton, and description of Acanthopleuribacteraceae fam. nov., Acanthopleuribacterales ord. nov., Holophagaceae fam. nov., Holophagales ord. nov. and Holophagae classis nov. in the phylum 'Acidobacteria'.

Authors:  Yukiyo Fukunaga; Midori Kurahashi; Kensuke Yanagi; Akira Yokota; Shigeaki Harayama
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.747

8.  Geothrix fermentans gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel Fe(III)-reducing bacterium from a hydrocarbon-contaminated aquifer.

Authors:  J D Coates; D J Ellis; C V Gaw; D R Lovley
Journal:  Int J Syst Bacteriol       Date:  1999-10

9.  O-demethylase from Acetobacterium dehalogenans--substrate specificity and function of the participating proteins.

Authors:  F Kaufmann; G Wohlfarth; G Diekert
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  1998-05-01

10.  The ether-cleaving methyltransferase system of the strict anaerobe Acetobacterium dehalogenans: analysis and expression of the encoding genes.

Authors:  Anke Schilhabel; Sandra Studenik; Martin Vödisch; Sandra Kreher; Bernhard Schlott; Antonio J Pierik; Antonio Y Pierik; Gabriele Diekert
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2008-11-14       Impact factor: 3.490

View more
  9 in total

1.  Linking Microbial Community and Catabolic Gene Structures during the Adaptation of Three Contaminated Soils under Continuous Long-Term Pollutant Stress.

Authors:  Daiana Lima-Morales; Ruy Jáuregui; Amelia Camarinha-Silva; Robert Geffers; Dietmar H Pieper; Ramiro Vilchez-Vargas
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  A new framework for approaching precision bioremediation of PAH contaminated soils.

Authors:  Lauren K Redfern; Courtney M Gardner; Emina Hodzic; P Lee Ferguson; Helen Hsu-Kim; Claudia K Gunsch
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 10.588

3.  The role of oxygen in stimulating methane production in wetlands.

Authors:  Jared L Wilmoth; Jeffra K Schaefer; Danielle R Schlesinger; Spencer W Roth; Patrick G Hatcher; Julie K Shoemaker; Xinning Zhang
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 13.211

Review 4.  The Ecology of Acidobacteria: Moving beyond Genes and Genomes.

Authors:  Anna M Kielak; Cristine C Barreto; George A Kowalchuk; Johannes A van Veen; Eiko E Kuramae
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Microbial Community Succession and Nutrient Cycling Responses following Perturbations of Experimental Saltwater Aquaria.

Authors:  Holly M Bik; Alexandra Alexiev; Sabreen K Aulakh; Lakshmi Bharadwaj; Jennifer Flanagan; John M Haggerty; Sarah M Hird; Guillaume Jospin; Jenna M Lang; Laura A Sauder; Josh D Neufeld; Andrew Shaver; Akshay Sethi; Jonathan A Eisen; David A Coil
Journal:  mSphere       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 4.389

Review 6.  Recent Understanding of Soil Acidobacteria and Their Ecological Significance: A Critical Review.

Authors:  Sadaf Kalam; Anirban Basu; Iqbal Ahmad; R Z Sayyed; Hesham Ali El-Enshasy; Daniel Joe Dailin; Ni Luh Suriani
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  Genomic Analysis of Family UBA6911 (Group 18 Acidobacteria) Expands the Metabolic Capacities of the Phylum and Highlights Adaptations to Terrestrial Habitats.

Authors:  Archana Yadav; Jenna C Borrelli; Mostafa S Elshahed; Noha H Youssef
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Crop rotation reduces the frequency of anaerobic soil bacteria in Red Latosol of Brazil.

Authors:  Raul Matias Cezar; Fabiane Machado Vezzani; Glaciela Kaschuk; Eduardo Balsanelli; Emanuel Maltempi de Souza; Luciano Kayser Vargas; Rudimar Molin
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 2.214

Review 9.  Using gas mixtures of CO, CO2 and H2 as microbial substrates: the do's and don'ts of successful technology transfer from laboratory to production scale.

Authors:  Ralf Takors; Michael Kopf; Joerg Mampel; Wilfried Bluemke; Bastian Blombach; Bernhard Eikmanns; Frank R Bengelsdorf; Dirk Weuster-Botz; Peter Dürre
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 5.813

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.