Literature DB >> 22764242

Sensory preference in speech production revealed by simultaneous alteration of auditory and somatosensory feedback.

Daniel R Lametti1, Sazzad M Nasir, David J Ostry.   

Abstract

The idea that humans learn and maintain accurate speech by carefully monitoring auditory feedback is widely held. But this view neglects the fact that auditory feedback is highly correlated with somatosensory feedback during speech production. Somatosensory feedback from speech movements could be a primary means by which cortical speech areas monitor the accuracy of produced speech. We tested this idea by placing the somatosensory and auditory systems in competition during speech motor learning. To do this, we combined two speech-learning paradigms to simultaneously alter somatosensory and auditory feedback in real time as subjects spoke. Somatosensory feedback was manipulated by using a robotic device that altered the motion path of the jaw. Auditory feedback was manipulated by changing the frequency of the first formant of the vowel sound and playing back the modified utterance to the subject through headphones. The amount of compensation for each perturbation was used as a measure of sensory reliance. All subjects were observed to correct for at least one of the perturbations, but auditory feedback was not dominant. Indeed, some subjects showed a stable preference for either somatosensory or auditory feedback during speech.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22764242      PMCID: PMC3404292          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0404-12.2012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  27 in total

Review 1.  Auditory feedback in learning and maintenance of vocal behaviour.

Authors:  M S Brainard; A J Doupe
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Learning of visuomotor transformations for vectorial planning of reaching trajectories.

Authors:  J W Krakauer; Z M Pine; M F Ghilardi; C Ghez
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Individual differences in speech adaptation to an artificial palate.

Authors:  S R Baum; D H McFarland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  When feeling is more important than seeing in sensorimotor adaptation.

Authors:  Robert J van Beers; Daniel M Wolpert; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2002-05-14       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Susceptibility to delayed auditory feedback and dependence on auditory or oral sensory feedback.

Authors:  B D Burke
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 2.288

6.  Somatosensory basis of speech production.

Authors:  Stéphanie Tremblay; Douglas M Shiller; David J Ostry
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-06-19       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Speech deterioration in postlingually deafened adults.

Authors:  H Lane; J W Webster
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Integration of auditory and somatosensory error signals in the neural control of speech movements.

Authors:  Yongqiang Feng; Vincent L Gracco; Ludo Max
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Compensation following real-time manipulation of formants in isolated vowels.

Authors:  David W Purcell; Kevin G Munhall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Relationships between oral sensory feedback skills and adaptation to delayed auditory feedback.

Authors:  J S Attanasio
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 2.288

View more
  83 in total

1.  Auditory prediction during speaking and listening.

Authors:  Marc Sato; Douglas M Shiller
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Effects of real-time cochlear implant simulation on speech production.

Authors:  Elizabeth D Casserly
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  A trade-off between somatosensory and auditory related brain activity during object naming but not reading.

Authors:  Mohamed L Seghier; Thomas M H Hope; Susan Prejawa; 'Ōiwi Parker Jones; Melanie Vitkovitch; Cathy J Price
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Modeling the Role of Sensory Feedback in Speech Motor Control and Learning.

Authors:  Benjamin Parrell; John Houde
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Contributions of Auditory and Somatosensory Feedback to Vocal Motor Control.

Authors:  Dante J Smith; Cara Stepp; Frank H Guenther; Elaine Kearney
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Sensorimotor adaptation affects perceptual compensation for coarticulation.

Authors:  William L Schuerman; Srikantan Nagarajan; James M McQueen; John Houde
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Coupling dynamics in speech gestures: amplitude and rate influences.

Authors:  Pascal H H M van Lieshout
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The relationship between acoustical and perceptual measures of vocal effort.

Authors:  Victoria S McKenna; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Noninvasive neurostimulation of left ventral motor cortex enhances sensorimotor adaptation in speech production.

Authors:  Terri L Scott; Laura Haenchen; Ayoub Daliri; Julia Chartove; Frank H Guenther; Tyler K Perrachione
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 2.381

10.  Brief periods of auditory perceptual training can determine the sensory targets of speech motor learning.

Authors:  Daniel R Lametti; Sonia A Krol; Douglas M Shiller; David J Ostry
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-05-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.