Literature DB >> 17063973

Validation of the standardized field sobriety test battery at 0.08% blood alcohol concentration.

Jack Stuster1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A field study was conducted to evaluate the accuracy of the Standardized Field Sobriety Test (SFST) battery to assist officers in making arrest decisions at blood alcohol concentrations (BACs) below 0.10%.
BACKGROUND: The SFST Battery was validated at 0.10% BAC in 1981, but since then many states have reduced statutory limits for driving while intoxicated to 0.08% BAC.
METHODS: During routine patrols, participating officers followed study procedures in administering SFSTs, scoring results, making arrest/no arrest decisions, and completing a data collection form for each of the 297 motorists evaluated during the study period. The officers' final step in each case was the administration of an evidentiary breath alcohol test.
RESULTS: Overall, officers' decisions were correct in more than 91% of the cases at the 0.08% BAC level. Cohen's kappa tests found all officers' scores to be within the categories of "substantial" and "near perfect" agreement, indicating low variance among the officers and a high degree of interrater reliability.
CONCLUSION: The results of this study provide evidence of the validity of the SFST Battery as an accurate and reliable decision aid for discriminating between BACs above and below 0.08%. APPLICATION: The SFST Battery presently is used by law enforcement officers throughout the United States to help make roadside arrest decisions for impaired driving.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17063973     DOI: 10.1518/001872006778606895

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Factors        ISSN: 0018-7208            Impact factor:   2.888


  7 in total

1.  Detecting impairment associated with cannabis with and without alcohol on the Standardized Field Sobriety Tests.

Authors:  Luke A Downey; Rebecca King; Katherine Papafotiou; Phillip Swann; Edward Ogden; Martin Boorman; Con Stough
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 2.  Medical Cannabis for Headache Pain: a Primer for Clinicians.

Authors:  Robert A Duarte; Stephen Dahmer; Shayna Y Sanguinetti; Grace Forde; Diana P Duarte; Lawrence F Kobak
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2021-10-09

Review 3.  A Judicial Perspective on Expert Testimony in Marijuana Driving Cases.

Authors:  Mary A Celeste
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2016-08-19

4.  Police Decision-Making in the Absence of Evidence-Based Guidelines: Assessment of Alcohol-Intoxicated Eyewitnesses.

Authors:  Daniel Pettersson; Magnus Bergquist; Angelica V Hagsand
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-02-03

5.  A placebo-controlled study to assess Standardized Field Sobriety Tests performance during alcohol and cannabis intoxication in heavy cannabis users and accuracy of point of collection testing devices for detecting THC in oral fluid.

Authors:  W M Bosker; E L Theunissen; S Conen; K P C Kuypers; W K Jeffery; H C Walls; G F Kauert; S W Toennes; M R Moeller; J G Ramaekers
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2012-05-13       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Assessment of cognitive and psychomotor impairment, subjective effects, and blood THC concentrations following acute administration of oral and vaporized cannabis.

Authors:  Tory R Spindle; Erin L Martin; Megan Grabenauer; Thomas Woodward; Michael A Milburn; Ryan Vandrey
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Are the Preliminary Impairment Tests used by UK police fit for purpose?

Authors:  Gavin Trotter; Rhian Skinner; Brian Rooney
Journal:  Med Sci Law       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 1.266

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.