Literature DB >> 22759831

Psychometric properties and administration of the wrist/hand subscales of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment in minimally impaired upper extremity hemiparesis in stroke.

Stephen J Page1, Peter Levine, Erinn Hade.   

Abstract

There is a need for time-efficient, valid measures of distal paretic upper extremity (UE) movement. The purposes of this study were to (1) determine the psychometric properties of the wrist stability and mobility and wrist/hand scale of the upper extremity Fugl-Meyer (w/h UE FM) as a "stand-alone" measure of distal UE movement; and (2) provide detailed instructions on w/h UE FM administration and scoring. The upper extremity Fugl Meyer (UE FM) and Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) were administered on 2 separate occasions to each of 29 subjects exhibiting stable, mild UE hemiparesis (23 men; mean age ± SD, 60.8±12.3 y; mean time since stroke onset for subjects in the sample, 36.0 mo). Fifty-eight observations were collected on each measure. w/h UE FM internal consistency levels (measured by Cronbach α) were high (.90 and .88 for first and second testing sessions, respectively). The intraclass correlation coefficient for the UE FM was .98, while the intraclass correlation coefficient for the w/h UE FM was .97. Concurrent validity measured by Spearman correlation was moderately high between the w/h UE FM and ARAT (.72, P<.001). From these data, it appears that the w/h UE FM is a promising tool to measure distal UE movement in minimally impaired stroke, although more research with a larger sample is needed. A standardized approach to UE test administration is critical to accurate score interpretation across patients and trials. Thus, the article also provides instructions and pictures for w/h UE FM administration and scoring.
Copyright © 2012 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22759831      PMCID: PMC3494780          DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.06.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  26 in total

1.  The reliability of the wolf motor function test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke.

Authors:  D M Morris; G Uswatte; J E Crago; E W Cook; E Taub
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.966

2.  The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance.

Authors:  A R Fugl-Meyer; L Jääskö; I Leyman; S Olsson; S Steglind
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med       Date:  1975

3.  The intra- and interrater reliability of the action research arm test: a practical test of upper extremity function in patients with stroke.

Authors:  J H Van der Lee; V De Groot; H Beckerman; R C Wagenaar; G J Lankhorst; L M Bouter
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.966

4.  The Modified Mini-Mental State (3MS) examination.

Authors:  E L Teng; H C Chui
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 4.384

5.  Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment of sensorimotor recovery following cerebrovascular accident.

Authors:  P W Duncan; M Propst; S G Nelson
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1983-10

6.  A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research.

Authors:  R C Lyle
Journal:  Int J Rehabil Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.479

Review 7.  Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Henk T Hendricks; Jacques van Limbeek; Alexander C Geurts; Machiel J Zwarts
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Electrical stimulation of the upper limb in stroke: stimulation of the extensors of the hand vs. alternate stimulation of flexors and extensors.

Authors:  J R de Kroon; M J IJzerman; G J Lankhorst; G Zilvold
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.159

9.  Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity.

Authors:  R W Bohannon; M B Smith
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1987-02

10.  Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke.

Authors:  Gert Kwakkel; Boudewijn J Kollen; Jeroen van der Grond; Arie J H Prevo
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2003-08-07       Impact factor: 7.914

View more
  28 in total

1.  Psychometric properties of measures of upper limb activity performance in adults with and without spasticity undergoing neurorehabilitation-A systematic review.

Authors:  Shannon Pike; Anne Cusick; Kylie Wales; Lisa Cameron; Lynne Turner-Stokes; Stephen Ashford; Natasha A Lannin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Roles of Lesioned and Nonlesioned Hemispheres in Reaching Performance Poststroke.

Authors:  Rachael M Harrington; Evan Chan; Amanda K Rounds; Clinton J Wutzke; Alexander W Dromerick; Peter E Turkeltaub; Michelle L Harris-Love
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 3.919

3.  Rasch Analysis of the Wrist and Hand Fugl-Meyer: Dimensionality and Item-Level Characteristics.

Authors:  Andrew C Persch; P Cristian Gugiu; Craig A Velozo; Stephen J Page
Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.649

4.  Psychometrics of the wrist stability and hand mobility subscales of the Fugl-Meyer assessment in moderately impaired stroke.

Authors:  Stephen J Page; Erinn Hade; Andrew Persch
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2014-09-04

5.  CCR5 Is a Therapeutic Target for Recovery after Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Mary T Joy; Einor Ben Assayag; Dalia Shabashov-Stone; Sigal Liraz-Zaltsman; Jose Mazzitelli; Marcela Arenas; Nora Abduljawad; Efrat Kliper; Amos D Korczyn; Nikita S Thareja; Efrat L Kesner; Miou Zhou; Shan Huang; Tawnie K Silva; Noomi Katz; Natan M Bornstein; Alcino J Silva; Esther Shohami; S Thomas Carmichael
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 66.850

6.  Efficacy of robot-assisted fingers training in chronic stroke survivors: a pilot randomized-controlled trial.

Authors:  Evan A Susanto; Raymond Ky Tong; Corinna Ockenfeld; Newmen Sk Ho
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 4.262

7.  Predictive factors of hypertonia in the upper extremity of chronic stroke survivors.

Authors:  GyuChang Lee; SeungHeon An; YunBok Lee; DongGeon Lee; Dong-Sik Park
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-08-21

8.  Psychometric Properties of the Lower Extremity Subscale of the Fugl-Myer Assessment for Community-dwelling Hemiplegic Stroke Patients.

Authors:  Eun Young Park; Yoo Im Choi
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2014-11-13

Review 9.  Upper Limb Outcome Measures Used in Stroke Rehabilitation Studies: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Leire Santisteban; Maxime Térémetz; Jean-Pierre Bleton; Jean-Claude Baron; Marc A Maier; Påvel G Lindberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Hand robotics rehabilitation: feasibility and preliminary results of a robotic treatment in patients with hemiparesis.

Authors:  Patrizio Sale; Valentina Lombardi; Marco Franceschini
Journal:  Stroke Res Treat       Date:  2012-12-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.