Literature DB >> 31858870

Roles of Lesioned and Nonlesioned Hemispheres in Reaching Performance Poststroke.

Rachael M Harrington1,2,3,4, Evan Chan2,5, Amanda K Rounds2,3,5, Clinton J Wutzke3, Alexander W Dromerick2,6, Peter E Turkeltaub2,6, Michelle L Harris-Love2,3.   

Abstract

Background. Severe poststroke arm impairment is associated with greater activation of the nonlesioned hemisphere during movement of the affected arm. The circumstances under which this activation may be adaptive or maladaptive remain unclear. Objective. To identify the functional relevance of key lesioned and nonlesioned hemisphere motor areas to reaching performance in patients with mild versus severe arm impairment. Methods. A total of 20 participants with chronic stroke performed a reaching response time task with their affected arm. During the reaction time period, a transient magnetic stimulus was applied over the primary (M1) or dorsal premotor cortex (PMd) of either hemisphere, and the effect of the perturbation on movement time (MT) was calculated. Results. For perturbation of the nonlesioned hemisphere, there was a significant interaction effect of Site of perturbation (PMd vs M1) by Group (mild vs severe; P < .001). Perturbation of PMd had a greater effect on MT in the severe versus the mild group. This effect was not observed with perturbation of M1. For perturbation of the lesioned hemisphere, there was a main effect of site of perturbation (P < .05), with perturbation of M1 having a greater effect on MT than PMd. Conclusions. These results demonstrate that, in the context of reaching movements, the role of the nonlesioned hemisphere depends on both impairment severity and the specific site that is targeted. A deeper understanding of these individual-, task-, and site-specific factors is essential for advancing the potential usefulness of neuromodulation to enhance poststroke motor recovery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dorsal premotor cortex; hemiparesis; nonlesioned hemisphere; rehabilitation; stroke; transcranial magnetic stimulation

Year:  2019        PMID: 31858870      PMCID: PMC6954952          DOI: 10.1177/1545968319876253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair        ISSN: 1545-9683            Impact factor:   3.919


  66 in total

1.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.

Authors:  M F Folstein; S E Folstein; P R McHugh
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 4.791

2.  Contralesional motor cortex activation depends on ipsilesional corticospinal tract integrity in well-recovered subcortical stroke patients.

Authors:  Martin Lotze; Willy Beutling; Moritz Loibl; Martin Domin; Thomas Platz; Ulf Schminke; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 3.919

3.  Neural activity in primary motor and dorsal premotor cortex in reaching tasks with the contralateral versus ipsilateral arm.

Authors:  Paul Cisek; Donald J Crammond; John F Kalaska
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The role of dorsal premotor area in reaction task: comparing the "virtual lesion" effect of paired pulse or theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Hitoshi Mochizuki; Michele Franca; Ying-Zu Huang; John C Rothwell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-27       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The role of multiple contralesional motor areas for complex hand movements after internal capsular lesion.

Authors:  Martin Lotze; Jochen Markert; Paul Sauseng; Julia Hoppe; Christian Plewnia; Christian Gerloff
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-05-31       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Variability of motor evoked potentials in stroke explained by corticospinal pathway integrity.

Authors:  Kelsey A Potter-Baker; Yin-Liang Lin; Andre G Machado; Adriana B Conforto; David A Cunningham; Vishwanath Sankarasubramanian; Ken Sakaie; Ela B Plow
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 7.  Biomarkers of Stroke Recovery: Consensus-Based Core Recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable.

Authors:  Lara A Boyd; Kathryn S Hayward; Nick S Ward; Cathy M Stinear; Charlotte Rosso; Rebecca J Fisher; Alexandre R Carter; Alex P Leff; David A Copland; Leeanne M Carey; Leonardo G Cohen; D Michele Basso; Jane M Maguire; Steven C Cramer
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2017 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 3.919

8.  Anatomy of stroke injury predicts gains from therapy.

Authors:  Jeff D Riley; Vu Le; Lucy Der-Yeghiaian; Jill See; Jennifer M Newton; Nick S Ward; Steven C Cramer
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 9.  Activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of motor-related neural activity after stroke.

Authors:  Anne K Rehme; Simon B Eickhoff; Claudia Rottschy; Gereon R Fink; Christian Grefkes
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  What have We Learned from "Perturbing" the Human Cortical Motor System with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation?

Authors:  Philippe A Chouinard; Tomáš Paus
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  3 in total

1.  TMS-Induced Central Motor Conduction Time at the Non-Infarcted Hemisphere Is Associated with Spontaneous Motor Recovery of the Paretic Upper Limb after Severe Stroke.

Authors:  Maurits H J Hoonhorst; Rinske H M Nijland; Cornelis H Emmelot; Boudewijn J Kollen; Gert Kwakkel
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-05-15

2.  Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Augment the Effect of Motor Imagery-Assisted Brain-Computer Interface Training in Chronic Stroke Patients-Cortical Reorganization Considerations.

Authors:  Effie Chew; Wei-Peng Teo; Ning Tang; Kai Keng Ang; Yee Sien Ng; Juan Helen Zhou; Irvin Teh; Kok Soon Phua; Ling Zhao; Cuntai Guan
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 4.003

3.  Cortical reorganization after motor stroke: A pilot study on differences between the upper and lower limbs.

Authors:  Ellen Binder; Martha Leimbach; Eva-Maria Pool; Lukas J Volz; Simon B Eickhoff; Gereon R Fink; Christian Grefkes
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 5.399

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.