Literature DB >> 12907818

Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke.

Gert Kwakkel1, Boudewijn J Kollen, Jeroen van der Grond, Arie J H Prevo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: To improve the accuracy of early postonset prediction of motor recovery in the flaccid hemiplegic arm, the effects of change in motor function over time on the accuracy of prediction were evaluated, and a prediction model for the probability of regaining dexterity at 6 months was developed.
METHODS: In 102 stroke patients, dexterity and paresis were measured with the Action Research Arm Test, Motricity Index, and Fugl-Meyer motor evaluation. For model development, 23 candidate determinants were selected. Logistic regression analysis was used for prognostic factors and model development.
RESULTS: At 6 months, some dexterity in the paretic arm was found in 38%, and complete functional recovery was seen in 11.6% of the patients. Total anterior circulation infarcts, right hemisphere strokes, homonymous hemianopia, visual gaze deficit, visual inattention, and paresis were statistically significant related to a poor arm function. Motricity Index leg scores of at least 25 points in the first week and Fugl-Meyer arm scores of 11 points in the second week increasing to 19 points in the fourth week raised the probability of developing some dexterity (Action Research Arm Test >or=10 points) from 74% (positive predictive value [PPV], 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63 to 0.86) to 94% (PPV, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.76 to 0.91) at 6 months. No change in probabilities of prediction dexterity was found after 4 weeks.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on the Fugl-Meyer scores of the flaccid arm, optimal prediction of arm function outcome at 6 months can be made within 4 weeks after onset. Lack of voluntary motor control of the leg in the first week with no emergence of arm synergies at 4 weeks is associated with poor outcome at 6 months.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12907818     DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000087172.16305.CD

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  301 in total

1.  Lesions to primary sensory and posterior parietal cortices impair recovery from hand paresis after stroke.

Authors:  Eugenio Abela; John Missimer; Roland Wiest; Andrea Federspiel; Christian Hess; Matthias Sturzenegger; Bruno Weder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Psychometric properties and administration of the wrist/hand subscales of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment in minimally impaired upper extremity hemiparesis in stroke.

Authors:  Stephen J Page; Peter Levine; Erinn Hade
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 3.966

3.  Immersive Virtual Reality Mirror Therapy for Upper Limb Recovery After Stroke: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Lynne M Weber; Dawn M Nilsen; Glen Gillen; Jin Yoon; Joel Stein
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.159

4.  The use of augmented auditory feedback to improve arm reaching in stroke: a case series.

Authors:  Joyce L Chen; Shinya Fujii; Gottfried Schlaug
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.033

Review 5.  Clinical practice. Rehabilitation after stroke.

Authors:  Bruce H Dobkin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-04-21       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  Confounders in rehabilitation trials of task-oriented training: lessons from the designs of the EXCITE and SCILT multicenter trials.

Authors:  Bruce H Dobkin
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.919

Review 7.  Issues in selecting outcome measures to assess functional recovery after stroke.

Authors:  Sharon Barak; Pamela W Duncan
Journal:  NeuroRx       Date:  2006-10

8.  Innovation in neurological upper extremity rehabilitation.

Authors:  Jane Bear-Lehman; Susan V Duff
Journal:  J Hand Ther       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 1.950

Review 9.  Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gert Kwakkel; Boudewijn J Kollen; Hermano I Krebs
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 3.919

10.  Neural substrates underlying stimulation-enhanced motor skill learning after stroke.

Authors:  Stéphanie Lefebvre; Laurence Dricot; Patrice Laloux; Wojciech Gradkowski; Philippe Desfontaines; Frédéric Evrard; André Peeters; Jacques Jamart; Yves Vandermeeren
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 13.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.