Literature DB >> 22757637

A comparison of published rates of resection margin involvement and intra-operative perforation between standard and 'cylindrical' abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer.

A Krishna1, M J F X Rickard, A Keshava, O F Dent, P H Chapuis.   

Abstract

AIM: The study aimed to compare recent reports on standard and alternative methods of abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer regarding the rates of circumferential resection margin involvement and intra-operative bowel perforation.
METHOD: Data on rates of margin involvement and perforation were obtained from eight recently published reports and also from a prospective registry of resections at Concord Hospital. Rates of these outcomes and their 95% confidence intervals were evaluated.
RESULTS: There was no evidence that extralevator abdominoperineal excision yielded significantly lower rates of resection margin involvement or intra-operative bowel perforation compared with standard abdominoperineal excision in six independent hospital- and population-based patient series. Abdominosacral resection of the rectum, on the other hand, did show significantly lower rates of these endpoints, albeit in selected patients.
CONCLUSION: The role of extralevator abdominoperineal excision and abdominosacral resection of the rectum should be investigated further in randomized controlled trials.
© 2012 The Authors. Colorectal Disease © 2012 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 22757637     DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.03167.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  15 in total

1.  Long-term outcome of extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) for low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Sigmar Stelzner; Gunter Hellmich; Anja Sims; Thomas Kittner; Eric Puffer; Joerg Zimmer; Dorothea Bleyl; Helmut Witzigmann
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  No observable difference in operative oncological outcomes between extra-levator versus standard abdominoperineal excision.

Authors:  K J Gash; L Cooper; N Smart; R Longman; M Thomas
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  A comparison of the technical and oncologic validity between robot-assisted and conventional open abdominoperineal resection.

Authors:  Jin C Kim; Jae Y Kwak; Yong S Yoon; In J Park; Chan W Kim
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 4.  A systematic review of transabdominal levator division during abdominoperineal excision of the rectum (APER).

Authors:  D L H Baird; C Simillis; C Kontovounisios; Q Sheng; S Nikolaou; W L Law; S Rasheed; P P Tekkis
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  Extralevator versus standard abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  S K Perdawood; T Lund
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 3.781

6.  Selective extra levator versus conventional abdomino perineal resection: experience from a tertiary-care center.

Authors:  Vishwas D Pai; Reena Engineer; Prachi S Patil; Supreeta Arya; Ashwin L Desouza; Avanish P Saklani
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-06

7.  Laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal excision of the rectum: short-term outcomes of a prospective case series.

Authors:  S L Kipling; K Young; J D Foster; N J Smart; A E Hunter; E Cooper; N K Francis
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 3.781

8.  [Spincter preservation after selective chemoradiotherapy of rectal cancer. Interim results of the OCUM study].

Authors:  J Baral; M R Schön; R Ruppert; H Ptok; J Strassburg; P Brosi; M E Kreis; A Lewin; J Sauer; S Sawicki; L Schiffmann; G Winde; T Junginger; S Merkel; P Hermanek
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 0.955

9.  Extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) for rectal cancer--short-term results from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. Selective use of ELAPE warranted.

Authors:  Mattias Prytz; Eva Angenete; Jan Ekelund; Eva Haglind
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Clinical practice guidelines for the surgical treatment of rectal cancer: a consensus statement of the Hellenic Society of Medical Oncologists (HeSMO).

Authors:  Evaghelos Xynos; Paris Tekkis; Nikolaos Gouvas; Louiza Vini; Evangelia Chrysou; Maria Tzardi; Vassilis Vassiliou; Ioannis Boukovinas; Christos Agalianos; Nikolaos Androulakis; Athanasios Athanasiadis; Christos Christodoulou; Christos Dervenis; Christos Emmanouilidis; Panagiotis Georgiou; Ourania Katopodi; Panteleimon Kountourakis; Thomas Makatsoris; Pavlos Papakostas; Demetris Papamichael; George Pechlivanides; Georgios Pentheroudakis; Ioannis Pilpilidis; Joseph Sgouros; Charina Triantopoulou; Spyridon Xynogalos; Niki Karachaliou; Nikolaos Ziras; Odysseas Zoras; John Souglakos
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.