Literature DB >> 24848525

No observable difference in operative oncological outcomes between extra-levator versus standard abdominoperineal excision.

K J Gash1, L Cooper, N Smart, R Longman, M Thomas.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2014        PMID： 24848525     DOI： 10.1007/s10151-014-1151-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN： 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  The Miles operation--extralevator abdominoperineal excision.

Authors:  Paul Finan; Najib Haboubi
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.788

2.  Outcomes following surgery without radiotherapy for rectal cancer.

Authors:  K L Mathis; D W Larson; E J Dozois; R R Cima; M Huebner; M G Haddock; B G Wolff; H Nelson; J H Pemberton
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  A method of performing abdomino-perineal excision for carcinoma of the rectum and of the terminal portion of the pelvic colon (1908).

Authors:  W E Miles
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1971 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  Outcome of extralevator abdominoperineal excision compared with standard surgery: results from a single centre.

Authors:  D Asplund; E Haglind; E Angenete
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.788

Review 5.  A comparison of published rates of resection margin involvement and intra-operative perforation between standard and 'cylindrical' abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer.

Authors:  A Krishna; M J F X Rickard; A Keshava; O F Dent; P H Chapuis
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.788
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.