Literature DB >> 22755725

Comparison of topogram-based body size indices for CT dose consideration and scan protocol optimization.

Baojun Li1, Richard H Behrman, Alexander M Norbash.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To retrospectively compare different topogram-based patient body size indices and to determine the optimal topogram-based body size index as a basis for body computed tomography (CT) dose consideration and scan protocol optimization.
METHODS: Forty-three routine thorax and abdomen CT scans are studied retrospectively, with patient ages ranging from 18 to 67 yr. The individual patient's water-equivalent diameter (D(w)) of the scanned body region is computed from CT DICOM images as the "gold standard," after first converting from Hounsfield units values to μa values, where μ is the normalized tissue attenuation coefficient and a is the area per pixel. Four topogram-based body size indices [average diameter (D), girth (G), topogram projection area (E(topo)), and improved topogram projection area (E(topo)('))] are computed and correlated with D(w) using linear regression analysis. Specifically, D is calculated by averaging the coronal and sagittal diameters; G is computed by modeling the patient's cross-section as an ellipse; E(topo) is the product of the mean topogram pixel value and the width of the scanned body region; and (E(topo)(')) incorporates E(topo) with correction of patient miscentering and water attenuation coefficient. The accuracy of these four approaches for estimation of D(w) is assessed using linear regression models. Results are given in terms of 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
RESULTS: Regression analysis results in four different linear models. The standard error (95% CI) for estimation of D(w) from D and G was ±2.8 and ±3.1 cm, respectively (p = 0.297). The standard error for estimation of D(w) from E(topo) was significantly less than that from D (±2.1 cm, p < 0.01). The standard error for estimation of D(w) from (E(topo)(')) was ±1.3 cm, significantly less than that from E(topo) (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Among the four topogram-based patient body indices, (E(topo)(')) is the most accurate for estimation of individual x-ray attenuation of the scanned body region. Thus, (E(topo)(')) is an optimal topogram-based patient body size index that is relevant for determining the proper CT dose level for individual patients.
© 2012 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22755725     DOI: 10.1118/1.4718569

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  9 in total

1.  Evaluating the appropriateness of dosimetric indices in body CT.

Authors:  Gianluca Valeri; Silvia Cegna; Alberto Mari; Luigi La Riccia; Giovanni Mazzoni; Stefania Maggi; Andrea Giovagnoni
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Attenuation-based size metric for estimating organ dose to patients undergoing tube current modulated CT exams.

Authors:  Maryam Bostani; Kyle McMillan; Peiyun Lu; Hyun J Kim; Chris H Cagnon; John J DeMarco; Michael F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Use of Water Equivalent Diameter for Calculating Patient Size and Size-Specific Dose Estimates (SSDE) in CT: The Report of AAPM Task Group 220.

Authors:  Cynthia McCollough; Donovan M Bakalyar; Maryam Bostani; Samuel Brady; Kristen Boedeker; John M Boone; H Heather Chen-Mayer; Olav I Christianson; Shuai Leng; Baojun Li; Michael F McNitt-Gray; Roy A Nilsen; Mark P Supanich; Jia Wang
Journal:  AAPM Rep       Date:  2014-09

4.  The feasibility of a regional CTDIvol to estimate organ dose from tube current modulated CT exams.

Authors:  Maryam Khatonabadi; Hyun J Kim; Peiyun Lu; Kyle L McMillan; Chris H Cagnon; John J DeMarco; Michael F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Estimating patient dose from x-ray tube output metrics: automated measurement of patient size from CT images enables large-scale size-specific dose estimates.

Authors:  Ichiro Ikuta; Graham I Warden; Katherine P Andriole; Ramin Khorasani; Aaron Sodickson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Method of determining geometric patient size surrogates using localizer images in CT.

Authors:  Christiane S Burton
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Is It Better to Enter a Volume CT Dose Index Value before or after Scan Range Adjustment for Radiation Dose Optimization of Pediatric Cardiothoracic CT with Tube Current Modulation?

Authors:  Hyun Woo Goo
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 3.500

8.  Automated Calculation of Water-equivalent Diameter (DW) Based on AAPM Task Group 220.

Authors:  Choirul Anam; Freddy Haryanto; Rena Widita; Idam Arif; Geoff Dougherty
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Using body mass index to estimate individualised patient radiation dose in abdominal computed tomography.

Authors:  Siobhan O'Neill; Richard G Kavanagh; Brian W Carey; Niamh Moore; Michael Maher; Owen J O'Connor
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2018-11-28
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.