| Literature DB >> 22754353 |
Qiaoyan Cai1,2, Jiumao Lin1,2, Lihui Wei1,2, Ling Zhang1,2, Lili Wang1,2, Youzhi Zhan1,2, Jianwei Zeng1,2, Wei Xu3, Aling Shen1,2, Zhenfeng Hong1,2, Jun Peng1,2.
Abstract
Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 3 (STAT3), a common oncogenic mediator, is constitutively activated in many types of human cancers; therefore it is a major focus in the development of novel anti-cancer agents. Hedyotis diffusa Willd has been used as a major component in several Chinese medicine formulas for the clinical treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the precise mechanism of its anti-tumor activity remains largely unclear. Using a CRC mouse xenograft model, in the present study we evaluated the effect of the ethanol extract of Hedyotis diffusa Willd (EEHDW) on tumor growth in vivo and investigated the underlying molecular mechanisms. We found that EEHDW reduced tumor volume and tumor weight, but had no effect on body weight gain in CRC mice, demonstrating that EEHDW can inhibit CRC growth in vivo without apparent adverse effect. In addition, EEHDW treatment suppressed STAT3 phosphorylation in tumor tissues, which in turn resulted in the promotion of cancer cell apoptosis and inhibition of proliferation. Moreover, EEHDW treatment altered the expression pattern of several important target genes of the STAT3 signaling pathway, i.e., decreased expression of Cyclin D1, CDK4 and Bcl-2 as well as up-regulated p21 and Bax. These results suggest that suppression of the STAT3 pathway might be one of the mechanisms by which EEHDW treats colorectal cancer.Entities:
Keywords: Chinese medicine; Hedyotis diffusa Willd; STAT3 pathway; apoptosis; colorectal cancer; proliferation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22754353 PMCID: PMC3382778 DOI: 10.3390/ijms13056117
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Figure 1Chromatographic profile of ethanol extract of Hedyotis diffusa Willd (EEHDW). In order to control the quality of EEHDW, the peak areas of 1, 2, 3 should be in the optimum ratio of 1:6.4:9.2. An Agilent 1200 series HPLC system with DAD detector and a Sepax Sapphire-C18 column was used. The mobile phase consisted of solvent A (methanol) and solvent B (water). The gradient procedure was used as follows: 20–30% A at 0–15 min and 40–60% A at 15–40 min. The flow rate was 1.0 mL/min and the column temperature was set at 30 °C.
Figure 2Effect of EEHDW on tumor growth in CRC xenograft mice. After tumor development, the mice were given intra-gastric administration of a 6 g/kg/day dose of EEHDW or saline daily, 5 days a week for 16 days. Tumor volume (A), tumor weight (B) and body weight (C) were measured at the end of the experiment. Data shown are averages with SD (error bars) from 12 individual mice in each group. * p < 0.01, versus controls.
Figure 3Effect of EEHDW on cell apoptosis and proliferation in CRC mice. At the end of the experiment, tumor tissues were processed for immunohistochemical (IHC) staining for TUNEL (top) or PCNA (bottom). Left: The photographs are representative images taken at a magnification of 400×. Right: Quantification of IHC assay is represented as percentage of positively-stained cells. Data shown are averages with SD (error bars) from 10 individual mice in each group. * p < 0.01, versus controls.
Figure 4Effect of EEHDW on phosphorylation of STAT3 in CRC xenograft mice. (A) Three tumors were randomly selected from each group and the level of STAT3 phosphorylation in tumor tissues was determined by Western blot using an antibody that recognizes phosphorylated STAT3 at Tyr705. β-actin was used as the internal control. For each tumor sample, the Western blot assay was performed in triple. Data shown are representatives. (B) Densitometric analysis. The data were normalized to the mean protein expression of untreated control (100%). * p < 0.01, versus controls.
Figure 5Effect of EEHDW on the expression of Bcl-2, Bax, p21, Cyclin D1 and CDK4 in CRC xenograft mice. (A,B) Three tumors were randomly selected from each group and the mRNA or protein expression levels of Bcl-2, Bax, p21, Cyclin D1, CDK4 were determined by RT-PCR (A) and Western blot analyses (B). GAPDH and β-actin were used as the internal controls for the RT-PCR or Western blotting, respectively. For each tumor sample, Western blot and RT-PCR analyses were was performed in triple. Data shown are representatives. (C,D) Densitometric analysis. The data were normalized to the mean mRNA (C) or protein (D) expression of untreated control (100%). * p < 0.01, versus controls.