Literature DB >> 22754186

Validation Protocol: First Step of a Lean-Total Quality Management Principle in a New Laboratory Set-up in a Tertiary Care Hospital in India.

Barnali Das1.   

Abstract

Method validation is pursued as the first step in establishing Lean-Total Quality Management in a new clinical laboratory, in order to eliminate error in test results. Validation of all the new tests were done (with particular reference to alkaline phosphatase) by verifying reference intervals, analytical accuracy and precision, inter-assay and intra-assay variations, analytical sensitivity, limit of detection, linearity and reportable range, i.e. (i) Analytical measurement range (AMR) and (ii) Clinically reportable range (CRR). Our obtained reference range was within that of the manufacturer's and showed high degree of analytical accuracy between two laboratories (r(2) = 0.99). Precision was comparable with the manufacturer's claim with inter-assay variation CV 1.04% and intra-assay variation CV 1.54%. Lowest limit of detection was 1.0324 ± 0.007 with CV 0.34%. AMR was also verified with CV 1.26 and 0.69%, for level 1 and level 2 control sera, respectively. The assay was linear with different dilutions. Lean concept was also verified with high recovery percentage. Validation ensures that accurate and precise results are reported in a clinically relevant turn around time.

Keywords:  Alkaline phosphatase; Lean concept; Total quality management; Validation

Year:  2011        PMID: 22754186      PMCID: PMC3162948          DOI: 10.1007/s12291-011-0110-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Clin Biochem        ISSN: 0970-1915


  6 in total

1.  Lean Management and Six-Sigma yield big gains in hospital's immediate response laboratory. Quality improvement techniques save more than $400,000.

Authors:  Martha Sunyog
Journal:  Clin Leadersh Manag Rev       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct

2.  Lean six sigma in healthcare.

Authors:  Henk de Koning; John P S Verver; Jaap van den Heuvel; Soren Bisgaard; Ronald J M M Does
Journal:  J Healthc Qual       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.095

Review 3.  Biomarker method validation in anticancer drug development.

Authors:  J Cummings; T H Ward; A Greystoke; M Ranson; C Dive
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 8.739

4.  Laboratory quality management systems: missions, goals and activities in quality assurance.

Authors:  Cumhur Kilinc
Journal:  Clin Biochem       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.281

5.  Vocabulary for use in measurement procedures and description of reference materials in laboratory medicine.

Authors:  R Dybkaer
Journal:  Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem       Date:  1997-02

6.  Efficient and economic HPLC performance qualification.

Authors:  Lukas Kaminski; Matthias Degenhardt; Joachim Ermer; Claus Feussner; Heidemarie Höwer-Fritzen; Peter Link; Bernd Renger; Martin Tegtmeier; Hermann Wätzig
Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 3.935

  6 in total
  4 in total

1.  Quantification and comparison of bone-specific alkaline phosphatase with two methods in normal and paget's specimens.

Authors:  Jila Masrour Roudsari; Soleiman Mahjoub
Journal:  Caspian J Intern Med       Date:  2012

2.  Validation of Method Performance of pH, PCO2, PO2, Na(+), K(+) of Cobas b121 ABG Analyser.

Authors:  Sunil Kumar Nanda; Lopamudra Ray; Asha Dinakaran
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-06-20

3.  A guideline for reporting experimental protocols in life sciences.

Authors:  Olga Giraldo; Alexander Garcia; Oscar Corcho
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 4.  Guidelines for overcoming hospital managerial challenges: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Maria Crema; Chiara Verbano
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 2.423

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.